May 18, 20214 yr 5 hours ago, jsdarkstar said: They simply mounted a camera on the Descent Stage of the Lunar Module and pointed it at the steps. That giant leap was relayed live to NASA and TV viewers all over the world via receiving stations on Earth. The Westinghouse camera was stored for flight in the lunar module's Modular Equipment Stowage Assembly (MESA), a compartment near the ladder that Armstrong climbed down to reach the Moon's surface. To activate the camera, he pulled on a handle that in turn released the door to the MESA. I hope Eagle VA is OK.......
May 18, 20214 yr 3 hours ago, NOTW said: Right! Even nhl94 for sega couldn’t pull it off and they had guys that were bleeding from the head in that game.
May 18, 20214 yr Wait. The "Earth is flat” YouTube videos being 1 to 2 hours because of the mental gymnastics they have to make to confuse and make people question things are legit compared to the "debunking flat earth” videos which are 5ish minutes because it’s so f’ing easy to debunk are not legit.
May 18, 20214 yr 13 hours ago, JohnSnowsHair said: I love how the response to the debunking is that they're ignorant. There's no actual case being made that they're wrong. Flat earthers are fugging hilarious. And that debunker videos are 3-5 minutes…. During his rant about a 45 minute "debunking” video
May 18, 20214 yr 12 hours ago, jsdarkstar said: https://physicsworld.com/a/fighting-flat-earth-theory/ In 2017 the US rapper B.o.B (real name Bobby Ray Simmons Jr) started a crowd-funding campaign to launch a satellite. The rapper, a vocal proponent of "flat-Earth theory”, wanted to seek evidence that our planet is a disc, not a globe. His aim was to raise $200,000 (later upped to $1m) on the GoFundMe website, with the aim of sending one or more craft into space to help him "find the curve” – the term that "flat-Earthers” use to describe the edge of our supposed disc-shaped planet. I want to say, please do and put an end to this nonsense. But then again, they spent 20 grand on a space age gyroscope that proved the earth was round and did the logical thing: blame it on "energy from the heavens”
May 18, 20214 yr 7 hours ago, paco said: I want to say, please do and put an end to this nonsense. But then again, they spent 20 grand on a space age gyroscope that proved the earth was round and did the logical thing: blame it on "energy from the heavens” I mean, if they truly believe it they should pool resources to get evidence from a satellite. But they'll still blame the government for interfering or covering it up or something.
May 18, 20214 yr Author 18 hours ago, jsdarkstar said: Funny how Flat Earthers try to prove their point by claiming that the Moon Landing was fake, yet have no photos from Space showing the Earth is Flat. Conspiracy Nuts unite. 18 hours ago, jsdarkstar said: They simply mounted a camera on the Descent Stage of the Lunar Module and pointed it at the steps. That giant leap was relayed live to NASA and TV viewers all over the world via receiving stations on Earth. The Westinghouse camera was stored for flight in the lunar module's Modular Equipment Stowage Assembly (MESA), a compartment near the ladder that Armstrong climbed down to reach the Moon's surface. To activate the camera, he pulled on a handle that in turn released the door to the MESA. Dude, can't you see that the camera couldn't have been anywhere near those steps to get that photo, seems to me the camera would've needed to be mounted to a pole that's about 25 feet long to get that shot. Moreover, notice how Armstrong is lit up like a christmas tree even though he's in a shadow, it implies artificial was used but NASA lied/denied that they took artificial light to the Moon, there are many photos where you can see hotspots on his boots clearly showing artificial light. Once again, you guys are ignorant to all of the blunders the NASHOLES made with their fakery.
May 18, 20214 yr 15 minutes ago, EagleVA said: Dude, can't you see that the camera couldn't have been anywhere near those steps to get that photo, seems to me the camera would've needed to be mounted to a pole that's about 25 feet long to get that shot. Moreover, notice how Armstrong is lit up like a christmas tree even though he's in a shadow, it implies artificial was used but NASA lied/denied that they took artificial light to the Moon, there are many photos where you can see hotspots on his boots clearly showing artificial light. Once again, you guys are ignorant to all of the blunders the NASHOLES made with their fakery. Everything you just said is wrong. First, that Photo is taken by Armstrong of Buzz Aldrin descending the ladder. The Luminescence of the moon and Armstrong's Suit provides the light. The camera on the craft captured Armstrong's descent. Once again you make up stuff, and have no facts to support what you just stated. None. Buzz Aldrin climbs down the Eagle's ladder to the surface. Click image to enlarge. Credits: NASA https://www.history.com/news/lighting-simulation-offers-more-proof-of-moon-landing As it turns out, the conspiracy theorists were correct that an artificial light source illuminated the famous photograph of Aldrin. Only it wasn’t a studio light, but the man taking that photograph—Armstrong. "We found a clip of videotape that was shot from the other side of the ladder,” Daly said. "There is a huge glowing bright white light. And as we analyzed that video a little more we realized it’s Neil Armstrong himself. The bright white spacesuit that he was wearing reflected all that sunlight off of him and back onto Buzz Aldrin so essentially Neil Armstrong himself was a light source in that scene.” While moon dust reflects about 12 percent of the sun’s light, the spacesuits worn by the Apollo astronauts were virtual mirrors constructed of materials that reflected 85 percent of the light that struck them, and Armstrong was bathed in full sunlight as he took Aldrin’s photograph. Once the Nvidia engineers adjusted for the reflectivity of Armstrong’s suit, the lighting in the virtual rendering nearly matched the actual photograph and proved that Aldrin could have appeared illuminated in the Eagle’s shadow with the sun as the sole lighting source.
May 18, 20214 yr 3 minutes ago, EagleVA said: Dude, can't you see that the camera couldn't have been anywhere near those steps to get that photo, seems to me the camera would've needed to be mounted to a pole that's about 25 feet long to get that shot. Moreover, notice how Armstrong is lit up like a christmas tree even though he's in a shadow, it implies artificial was used but NASA lied/denied that they took artificial light to the Moon, there are many photos where you can see hotspots on his boots clearly showing artificial light. Once again, you guys are ignorant to all of the blunders the NASHOLES made with their fakery. You're an expert on refracted light? No?
May 18, 20214 yr 24 minutes ago, EagleVA said: Dude, can't you see that the camera couldn't have been anywhere near those steps to get that photo, seems to me the camera would've needed to be mounted to a pole that's about 25 feet long to get that shot. Moreover, notice how Armstrong is lit up like a christmas tree even though he's in a shadow, it implies artificial was used but NASA lied/denied that they took artificial light to the Moon, there are many photos where you can see hotspots on his boots clearly showing artificial light. Once again, you guys are ignorant to all of the blunders the NASHOLES made with their fakery. You poor little thing
May 18, 20214 yr Author 1 hour ago, jsdarkstar said: Everything you just said is wrong. First, that Photo is taken by Armstrong of Buzz Aldrin descending the ladder. The Luminescence of the moon and Armstrong's Suit provides the light. The camera on the craft captured Armstrong's descent. Once again you make up stuff, and have no facts to support what you just stated. None. NASA has a lie for every F-Up and trust me, I could provide links to documentaries pointing out many of them but here's the deal, I simply don't have time to be bothered with anyone that believe we landed on the Moon, it would be foolish of me to do so.
May 18, 20214 yr Author 2 hours ago, Toastrel said: You're an expert on refracted light? No? I've taken enough photos in shadows to know you need fill light.......that "luminescence of the Moon" is total foolishness, if it weren't you wouldn't see the shadow of the spacecraft, or maybe the luminescence just directed it's light on Armstrong.......I know, I know, NASA says it Buzz, I guess that's just as good a lie as any.
May 18, 20214 yr 3 minutes ago, EagleVA said: I've taken enough photos in shadows to know you need fill light.......that "luminescence of the Moon" is total foolishness, if it weren't you wouldn't see the shadow of the spacecraft, or maybe the luminescence just directed it's light on Armstrong.......I know, I know, NASA says it Buzz, I guess that's just as good a lie as any. Can't answer?
May 18, 20214 yr 13 minutes ago, EagleVA said: NASA has a lie for every F-Up and trust me, I could provide links to documentaries pointing out many of them but here's the deal, I simply don't have time to be bothered with anyone that believe we landed on the Moon, it would be foolish of me to do so. I have never seen on shred of evidence to show the moon landing was staged. Not one, that hasn't been totally refuted. The conspiracy theory is very weak on evidence.
May 18, 20214 yr 3. The moon landing is fake because the shadows aren’t right. Aldrin pictured with the Lunar Module "Eagle." NASA In images from the moon landing, it is possible to see certain objects even though they are in shadow. Skeptics argue that if the sun were the only source of light, this wouldn’t be the case. Therefore, the fact that you can see some objects in shadow must be the result of special Hollywood lighting. The problem with this theory is that although the sun is the main source of illumination on the moon, it isn’t the only source of illumination. Another source is the lunar ground, which reflects the sun’s light. In the Apollo 11 pictures, "the sunlight is being scattered or reflected off the ground every which way, and some of it—a small fraction but enough to be able to see—scatters into the shadows,” Fienberg says. This is why, in some images, you can make out a plaque that Armstrong and Aldrin left on the moon even though it’s lying in shadow. 2. The moon landing is fake because you can’t see the stars. Aldrin during the Apollo 11 extravehicular activity on the Moon. He has just deployed the Early Apollo Scientific Experiments Package (EASEP) where you can see the Passive Seismic Experiment Package, the Laser Ranging Retro-Reflector and the Lunar Module "Eagle". "One of the first arguments I heard and one of the easiest to debunk…is the fact that there are no stars in the lunar sky,” Fienberg says. Or rather, there are no stars in the pictures that Armstrong and Aldrin took on the moon. But if you’ve ever used a camera before, it’s easy to understand why. "All of the exposures of the astronauts on the moon are daylight exposures,” he explains. "The surface was brightly illuminated [from the sun]. And the astronauts are wearing bright white space suits that are highly reflective.” The exposure on the astronauts’ cameras was too short to capture the space suits and the moon’s surface while also capturing the comparatively dimmer stars. The same thing happens if you go onto someone’s back porch at night and turn on the lights. Even though you can see the stars from where you’re standing, a quick-exposure camera won’t be able to capture them.
May 18, 20214 yr To those who know the moon landing was real, conspiracy theories that it was a hoax may seem silly and innocuous. But their consequences aren’t: they spread misinformation, make people susceptible to other false theories and could earn you a punch from Buzz Aldrin.
May 18, 20214 yr 44 minutes ago, jsdarkstar said: To those who know the moon landing was real, conspiracy theories that it was a hoax may seem silly and innocuous. But their consequences aren’t: they spread misinformation, make people susceptible to other false theories and could earn you a punch from Buzz Aldrin. I think Buzz and EagleVA would get along swimmingly:
May 18, 20214 yr 2 minutes ago, paco said: I think Buzz and EagleVA would get along swimmingly: If they throw hands, my money is on Buzz.
May 18, 20214 yr How is it that the descent stage of the Eagle is still on the moon and was been photographed by the Lunar Orbiter as well as by other missions? Also, is Eagle VA saying we didn't land on the moon in 1969 or that we never landed on the moon ever?
May 18, 20214 yr 2 minutes ago, jsdarkstar said: How is it that the descent stage of the Eagle is still on the moon and was been photographed by the Lunar Orbiter as well as by other missions? Duh, because CGI. Do your research.
May 18, 20214 yr Just now, downundermike said: Duh, because CGI. Do your research. The Default answer of the Egg Heads, even though it didn't exist in 1969.
May 18, 20214 yr 1 minute ago, jsdarkstar said: How is it that the descent stage of the Eagle is still on the moon and was been photographed by the Lunar Orbiter as well as by other missions? Also, is Eagle VA saying we didn't land on the moon in 1969 or that we never landed on the moon ever? Probably an overhead shot of a scale model on the NASA soundstage at WB studios, duh.
May 18, 20214 yr So if we didn't have the technology to go the moon then explain how Apollo 10 went to the moon on 5-18-69. but we didn't have the technology. Or 12-21-68 with Apollo 8 the first mission to the Moon.
May 18, 20214 yr 16 minutes ago, jsdarkstar said: So if we didn't have the technology to go the moon then explain how Apollo 10 went to the moon on 5-18-69. but we didn't have the technology. A touching made up story with great acting. Hollywood is the best! DO YOUR RESEARCH!!
Create an account or sign in to comment