Later for the BS, I'm not letting you clowns off the hook, splain how we see the same Stars and Constellations everynight since the beginning of time if we're doing all of the spinning, orbiting, twisting, and any other movement involved in the helicentic BS, splain or shut up!!

27 minutes ago, EagleVA said:

Later for the BS, I'm not letting you clowns off the hook, splain how we see the same Stars and Constellations everynight since the beginning of time if we're doing all of the spinning, orbiting, twisting, and any other movement involved in the helicentic BS, splain or shut up!!

Because they move with us idiot. 

4 hours ago, downundermike said:

No argument you can make, so you resort to name calling and hiding behind the ignore feature.

And doesn't he have us on ignore ??

He does and no one quoted the post you made. 

52 minutes ago, EagleVA said:

You're pathetic.

Troll

36 minutes ago, EagleVA said:

Later for the BS, I'm not letting you clowns off the hook, splain how we see the same Stars and Constellations everynight since the beginning of time if we're doing all of the spinning, orbiting, twisting, and any other movement involved in the helicentic BS, splain or shut up!!

Troll

1 hour ago, EagleVA said:

Tell TheClownDownUnder (another dumb sheet)  that the Earth is stationary and it's the stars and constellitions that move.

As for you, the greatest scientist that ever lived (Tesla) said Einstein was a dumb sheet.

Einstein he would have been a good Hollywood director, he great imagination he had and that's about it. 

H invented nothing and his theories are refuted by all who weren't dazzled by the bogus Lorentz transformation equations that supported his imagination.  

Troll

17 minutes ago, Bwestbrook36 said:

He does and no one quoted the post you made. 

Guess I better be careful what I post just in case the board miraculously takes me off ignore and then he reports my post

 

 

Show us the validity of the flat earth conspiracy. Show us math, predictions,  and demonstrations, to support your claims.

Show us the Flat Earth Model that explains it. 

 

I'll wait.

 

 

 

This video confirms what I suspected. That radical Christianity is part of the root of Flat Earth Conspiracy. 

Do you believe in Creationism Science? (I mean religion).
 

 

This guy is 100 percent a troll. No doubt anymore. I was 50-50 for a bit but I'm convinced now.

Scientists will gather with local people on the Island of Principe, off the West coast of Africa, as it was here on 29 May 1919 that Arthur Eddington observed the positions of stars behind the sun during a total solar eclipse and proved that the sun’s gravity really did bend starlight just as Einstein’s theory of General Relativity said it would.

The Nobel Prize in Physics 1921

Why do a bowling ball and a car fall at exactly the same speed?

by edwardcentrella

Today, we all know that any two objects, if dropped from a 20-story building, will fall at the exact same rate and hit the ground at the exact same time.  For many hundreds of years, though, this was considered counter-intuitive, and indeed, incorrect.  While society has been asking scientific questions about the movement of matter for over 500 years, an acceptable answer arrived much later than this.  A book by Isaac Newton published in 1687 explained the mathematical reasoning behind falling objects, and his theories stand today as the best models we have to predict gravitational acceleration.

So what does all that have to do with falling objects?  When I was younger, I was sure that a car and a bowling ball would fall at different speeds – after all, if the car is many times heavier, then it’s pushing downward at an equivalently high rate, and so it should fall faster.  This logic was widely held before Newton (and his predecessors) broke new ground in explaining the behavior of gravity.  Even if you know today that all objects fall at the same time, you might not know exactly why this is.  As it turns out, the answer is unbelievably simple.  It’s actually pretty amazing how obvious it seems in retrospect, but we have centuries of research to draw on, so whatever.

So why do all objects fall at the exact same speed?

The answer goes back to Newton’s second law, perhaps the most famous second law (with the possible exception of thermodynamics’s second law), which states that F = M * a. In English, the force acting on an object can be indirectly calculated by finding the object’s mass and also by looking at how fast it’s accelerating.  If we know these two things, we can come up with a numerical response to the "amount of bashing” that this object is experience.  You can push a car up a hill at a very slow rate, but if that rate is constant (say, one foot per minute), then this equation tells us that no forces are acting here.  This goes back to Newton’s first law – just because an object moves doesn’t mean it’s experiencing force.  When you’re pushing a car, your force exerted on the car is exactly cancelled by the resistance of the car to movement.  Sure, you have to exert some force to get the car going, but once it’s moving smoothly, there are no more forces at play.

So if we look at dropping objects off of a building, we can use this same principle: force equals mass times acceleration.  Since it’s not true that all objects have the same mass (does a car "weigh” the same as a pencil?), that means the 2 other variables in F = M*a must always equalize, no matter the object.  And indeed, this is the case.

First let’s look at our car.  It has a very high mass, and we know that acceleration is constant on earth, so that leaves only force, F, as the changing value here.  That’s no problem – for now, let’s say that a falling car has more force acting on it than a pencil.  At the same time, our pencil has much less mass, but still falls with the same rate of acceleration, so its force must also be much, much smaller than the car’s.

Here’s the final jigsaw puzzle piece here: the gravitational force between any two objects depends only on their masses.  It will change depending on the mass of each object, but no other factors matter.

Let’s drop our car off the side of a building once more, and say that it has ten times the mass of a motorcycle.  The car will have ten times the force acting on it as explained by F = M*a, but because the mass is ten times higher, the car is ten times more "resistant” to being moved.  Let’s see this in our equation:

Force on an object = its mass * its acceleration

F = M * a

Since we said our car is ten times heavier than a motorcycle, we’ll add a 10 in front of the mass.

F = 10 M * a

The force, then, is going to be 10 times higher than if the mass were equivalent to just 1 "unit.”

10 F = 10 M * a

 

Our 10s cancel here, and acceleration is STILL equal to F / M.  Repeat this calculation with a pencil, and you’ll see the same result: a = F / M. In other words, a car that’s ten times heavier than a motorcycle will experience ten times the forces, but this is only because its mass is ten times greater.  Since the force depends on the mass, we expect this to happen.  But because of the mass being ten times greater, the extra force pulling on the car is exactly cancelled by its high mass.

Stephen Hawking explains this perfectly in his book, A Brief History of Time.

One can now see why all bodies fall at the same rate: a body of twice the weight will have twice the force of gravity pulling it down, but it will also have twice the mass.  According to Newton’s second law, these two effects will exactly cancel each other, so the acceleration will be the same in all cases.

In fact, this mystery that eluded mankind for centuries is adequately explained by the simple equation we’ve used above.  There are no complicated numbers, constants, or imaginary numbers.  There’s no calculus, no slopes and no polynomial factoring.  The equation is so simple that it almost seems impossible, but you can use it just as we have here to explain exactly why everything falls at the same rate.  Kind of nuts, isn’t it?

2 hours ago, jsdarkstar said:

 

 

Guys I told you the earth was Fing concave. F this flat earth or round earth crap. This video is clear. It’s concave!!!!

1 hour ago, jsdarkstar said:

 

I love this guy! 😂 

8 hours ago, DBW said:

I love this guy! 😂 

Yeah, He quotes George Castanza and the Penske file. I love this guy too.

14 hours ago, jsdarkstar said:

 

 

I've posted this several times before and once asked the him the very first point of the video:  Why can't the flat earth folks explain two separate phenomenon with a single model?

 

I'm afraid I never got an answer.  The closest to a response is "Its a debunker video" and it hand waved off.

7 minutes ago, paco said:

I've posted this several times before and once asked the him the very first point of the video:  Why can't the flat earth folks explain two separate phenomenon with a single model?

 

I'm afraid I never got an answer.  The closest to a response is "Its a debunker video" and it hand waved off.

Yeah, it's obvious the Flat Earth Priest hasn't watched it and if so, has no response to answer with math and science and has no Model to explain it. It's been totally debunked. 

I also believe that many members also believe in Creationism which has also been debunked by Science.

There’s a good explanation of Thursday’s total solar eclipses in here.  And why the entire world can’t see it as a total eclipse but rather a partial.   
 

spoiler: earth is round.  
 

https://www.tweaktown.com/news/79873/astronomer-says-thursdays-solar-eclipse-will-look-like-death-star/index.html?fbclid=IwAR314cDFGUXA2MV-oEWf5LrrpEbebsUxt5EOaA4X35Wj8sHGU-hjDrXkGaE

7 hours ago, paco said:

I've posted this several times before and once asked the him the very first point of the video:  Why can't the flat earth folks explain two separate phenomenon with a single model?

 

I'm afraid I never got an answer.  The closest to a response is "Its a debunker video" and it hand waved off.

Because he is trolling

Uhhhh, pretty sure film would melt on the sun.  Do your research! 

1 hour ago, paco said:

Uhhhh, pretty sure film would melt on the sun.  Do your research! 

Not if you stare at it long enough smart guy!

10 hours ago, NOTW said:

Lol, at this person:

How did you get past the dome and get to the sun to begin with?  Pretty sure the flat earth sun isn’t far enough away to even capture the full earth disc on on film.  And can we talk about how your fake picture of earth from the sun has stars but pictures of the fake moon landing dont? 
 

 

I was at the edge today