May 11, 20232 yr 49 minutes ago, EagleVA said: JellyBeanJoe and common sense is an oxymoron, don't waste your time with him.
May 11, 20232 yr 50 minutes ago, EagleVA said: So I guess the Big Bang is science? Yes, it is. You reject modern science. Like a creationist.
May 11, 20232 yr 13 hours ago, EagleVA said: JellyBeanJoe and common sense is an oxymoron, don't waste your time with him.
May 11, 20232 yr Author 21 hours ago, jsdarkstar said: Yes, it is. You reject modern science. Like a creationist. OK, so the Big Bang and Evolution goes together as both are the result of randomness. Seems to me you shouldn't shouldn't trust any of your conclusions, after all, you're a result happenstance as are your thoughts, only foolish fools believes in the Big Bang and Evolution.
May 11, 20232 yr 47 minutes ago, EagleVA said: OK, so the Big Bang and Evolution goes together as both are the result of randomness. Seems to me you shouldn't shouldn't trust any of your conclusions, after all, you're a result happenstance as are your thoughts, only foolish fools believes in the Big Bang and Evolution. Like I said, you reject modern science. Limited knowledge is not an aspired value. Even, The Reverend Monsignor Georges Lemaitre accepted science. Maybe you can too.
May 12, 20232 yr Author 19 minutes ago, jsdarkstar said: Like I said, you reject modern science. Limited knowledge is not an aspired value. Even, The Reverend Monsignor Georges Lemaitre accepted science. Maybe you can too. Darkie, you truly are under the influence of a dark spirit if you're giving credit to the catholic liar that invented the big bang theory The catholic church is the woman that rides the beast spoken of in the book of Revelation, it's an evil institution that's gonna get theirs. Expand your knowledge concerning the evil institution.
May 12, 20232 yr 27 minutes ago, EagleVA said: Darkie, you truly are under the influence of a dark spirit if you're giving credit to the catholic liar that invented the big bang theory The catholic church is the woman that rides the beast spoken of in the book of Revelation, it's an evil institution that's gonna get theirs. Expand your knowledge concerning the evil institution. He's not a liar. His work has been peer reviewed by the science community. As modern science has evolved, his work has been more and more substantiated and accepted. Really. JESUITS ERASING OUR FLAT EARTH, Johnny Cirruci. I feel dumb after watching that crap. Conspiracy theory not supported by fact.
May 12, 20232 yr Author 22 hours ago, jsdarkstar said: As modern science has evolved, his work has been more and more substantiated and accepted. Right, first there was nothing and then it exploded producing everything we see. Only a sad and lonely fool would call that substantiated science.
May 13, 20232 yr 1 hour ago, EagleVA said: Right, first there was nothing and then it exploded producing everything we see. Only a sad and lonely fool would call that substantiated science. If that's your understanding then you need to educate yourself instead of rejecting modern science for the foolish belief in conspiracy theories on a you tube video. Talk about sad and lonely.
May 15, 20232 yr You gotta realize what you are dealing with before trying to make these idiots understand basic physics.
May 16, 20232 yr Author On 5/12/2023 at 8:26 PM, jsdarkstar said: If that's your understanding then you need to educate yourself instead of rejecting modern science for the foolish belief in conspiracy theories on a you tube video. Talk about sad and lonely. Science? What repeatable experiment has been done to prove that hypothesis?? If you reply with anything other than there hasn't been any you're a damn liar!!
May 16, 20232 yr 8 hours ago, EagleVA said: Science? What repeatable experiment has been done to prove that hypothesis?? If you reply with anything other than there hasn't been any you're a damn liar!! In today's information age, ignorance of a given topic is a choice.
May 16, 20232 yr 9 hours ago, EagleVA said: Science? What repeatable experiment has been done to prove that hypothesis?? If you reply with anything other than there hasn't been any you're a damn liar!! Agreed. Scientists should build some sort of device to do experiments that replicate turning massless particles into mass. Would have to be an international effort so you would have to pick a neutral city like Geneva or something. Never happening!
May 16, 20232 yr 12 hours ago, EagleVA said: Science? What repeatable experiment has been done to prove that hypothesis?? If you reply with anything other than there hasn't been any you're a damn liar!! Uh, huh. It's not me that has been totally crushed by facts, evidences, and reason, but you. Over 87 pages you are made out to be the ignorant fool. And you come back for more. You have been asked repeatedly to provide an working FE Model and failed to do so. You are more about rejecting modern science then you are about defending and supporting the FE model. You are nothing but a Charlatan selling snake oil and know nothing about the ingredients.
May 16, 20232 yr Two major scientific discoveries provide strong support for the Big Bang theory: • Hubble's discovery in the 1920s of a relationship between a galaxy's distance from Earth and its speed; and • the discovery in the 1960s of cosmic microwave background radiation. Now let's hear the FE science that discredit's each. If you respond with anything other than you don't have any, then you're a bold face liar. Key observations supporting the big bang theory include: (1) expansion of the universe, (2) cosmic microwave background radiation, (3) abundances of the lightest chemical elements, and (4) age of the oldest-known stars.
May 16, 20232 yr Where are the FE scientists who reject Stephen Hawking's conclusions and mathematical science. In 1968 and 1970, Roger Penrose, Stephen Hawking, and George F. R. Ellis published papers where they showed that mathematical singularities were an inevitable initial condition of relativistic models of the Big Bang. Prove they are wrong. One of the common misconceptions about the Big Bang model is that it fully explains the origin of the universe. However, the Big Bang model does not describe how energy, time, and space were caused, but rather it describes the emergence of the present universe from an ultra-dense and high-temperature initial state. It is misleading to visualize the Big Bang by comparing its size to everyday objects. When the size of the universe at Big Bang is described, it refers to the size of the observable universe, and not the entire universe.
May 16, 20232 yr On 5/15/2023 at 6:55 AM, Boogyman said: You gotta realize what you are dealing with before trying to make these idiots understand basic physics.
May 16, 20232 yr Author 7 hours ago, paco said: Agreed. Scientists should build some sort of device to do experiments that replicate turning massless particles into mass. Would have to be an international effort so you would have to pick a neutral city like Geneva or something. Never happening! You're right, turning massless particles into mass is never gonna happen.
May 16, 20232 yr 28 minutes ago, EagleVA said: You're right, turning massless particles into mass is never gonna happen. NEVER!
May 16, 20232 yr 12 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said: @Next_Up Okay, I'll bite. Here is another thought on the topic. What is evolving is a new religion of identity egoism for which contrarianism and conspiracy thinking are the cannon with the first sacrament of "do your own research." The problem with this is that we are becoming a society (not because of morons, they've always been with us, but because of the efficiency of communication technologies) that is driven by strongly held but unfounded opinions and this results in the loss of abject truth. Everything is questioned, opinion is somehow equal to expertise, and nothing is true. EaglesVA is a cartoon character. However, the fact that there are many national forums that espouse similarly wacky conspiracy theories is something that should bother those of us who believe in our society.
Create an account or sign in to comment