13 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Hurts benched?

He’s hurt so the Eagles are being a little coy forcing the Jets to have to prepare for two quarterbacks. He’s marked as questionable for the game. 

47 minutes ago, Bwestbrook36 said:

The thing is Reagor does get open he is just horrible at everything else from the time he is targeted till the ball hits the ground. He puts himself out of position once the ball is up almost every time. Its insanity

He’s just not a very good receiver. I don’t know if he ever will be, but I think they should bench him at least. Maybe it will wake him up. 

Hurts numbers across a 17 game season looking at his performances in the new run heavy offense from Detroit forward would be:

57.8%, 2,445 yards 10 TD's, 14 INT's

1,136 rushing yards, 10 rushing TD's, 3 fumbles

10 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Hurts numbers across a 17 game season looking at his performances in the new run heavy offense from Detroit forward would be:

57.8%, 2,445 yards 10 TD's, 14 INT's

1,136 rushing yards, 10 rushing TD's, 3 fumbles

Yuk

1 minute ago, Bwestbrook36 said:

Yuk

These are the games being pointed to as improvement 

9 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Yeah.  Keep believing that.  

Guess again.  

My bad, I thought you were asking if he was officially out. Otherwise yeah, he's "hurt". 

Or he blows and they're thinking about sitting him.

3 hours ago, UK_EaglesFan89 said:

With this team? I really don't think so. This team isn't good enough on both sides of the ball. 

This team is definitely better with quality QB play, let alone elite play like Rodgers, Mahomes, and Brady would provide.  But, we will never know....

8 minutes ago, E-A-G-L-E-S Eagles said:

This team is definitely better with quality QB play, let alone elite play like Rodgers, Mahomes, and Brady would provide.  But, we will never know....

Better? No doubt about it. 

3 hours ago, jsb235 said:

I think it is hard to argue that any option is better than sticking with Hurts.

I don't know about that, I'm a big Matt Corral fan and I'm sure he'd bring his dynamic play to Philadelphia without missing a beat, kinda like Mac Jones did.....it's all about accuracy and Corral has it..

Honestly I’d just like to get a look at Minchew. 

4 minutes ago, nipples said:

Honestly I’d just like to get a look at Minchew. 

You love him so much you didn’t even spell his name right. 😂🤣🤣

40 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Yeah.  Keep believing that.  

Guess again.  

So you know he’s officially out? 

3 hours ago, jsb235 said:

In looking at the team's options, I think it boils down to this.

1. Draft a rookie.

2. Acquire a vet.

3. Stick with Hurts.

Is 3 the best option? Here's the argument. Right now the team is 18th in offensive yards per game at 351. They need about 40 more yards of offense a game to get in the top 5. They are also 11th in total defense ay 340, and need to reduce that total by about 40 to get in the top 5.

Smith is their leading receiver at around 60 yards a game. Reagor is at 16. On paper, replacing Reagor with another Smith gets you the 40 yards you need. Obviously it's not a perfect equation, but drafting a solid receiving prospect seems like the easiest way to get that extra 40 yards you need without hurting the run game or expending other resources.

It also allows four other top 100 picks to address the defense.

I think it is hard to argue that any option is better than sticking with Hurts. If he can simply throw for 40 more yards a game, our offense goes into the top 5. He has already shown he can be productive with Smith, so why not give him another similar target? Plus, you fix the defense, so even if adding the wideout fails, you have at least addressed one of the problems.

The problem with drafting a rookie is that the success rate is low, and you still have him throwing to Reagor. Plus, the run game gets worse. It is really easy to see a scenario where we draft a qb and get way worse on offense.

The same with adding a vet, except the cost is higher, so not only does the offense risk getting worse, we also still have an average defense that is trending down instead of up because we spent the draft capital on a qb.

The argument, in my mind, is pretty much over. The numbers don't lie. We need 40 more yards on offense and 40 less yards on defense to be an elite team. And we have a clear path to getting there. Draft a wr early and spend the rest of the picks on defense.     

Nah give up all draft capital for an old quarterback. Make the fans happy. Keep losing games. Blame the losses on lack of talent, but the happy fans are too dumb to see giving up draft capital to improve the talent would have been better to the team than getting an old quarterback. 

40 minutes ago, Swoop said:

My bad, I thought you were asking if he was officially out. Otherwise yeah, he's "hurt". 

Or he blows and they're thinking about sitting him.

Almost everyone knows he sucks except the "Hurts Humpers"

They should sit him. He's a scrub

51 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Yeah.  Keep believing that.  

He's been pounding his Hurts jersey all week

4 hours ago, Talonblood said:

Imma start playing "Black Hole Sun" by Soundgarden before every game Hurts and Reagor play- as the theme song. 🤟🏻

Chris Cornell 

5 hours ago, dawkins4prez said:

If Geno Smith can carve out a 10 yr career, Hurts will be around for a long while.  He's a great locker room guy which helps that cause.

Geno Smith can pass.

25 minutes ago, EazyEaglez said:

You love him so much you didn’t even spell his name right. 😂🤣🤣

I’ve never pumped up Minshew so not sure how I "love him” just because I said I want to get a look at him. Hurts just isn’t the answer. Might as well see if Minshew can be. Chances are he isn’t,  but at least see what the offense can do with a QB who is a better passer. 
 

Even if he’s not the future, maybe a QB who can throw the ball helps us learn more about guys like Smith and Watkins. 

4 minutes ago, nipples said:

I’ve never pumped up Minshew so not sure how I "love him” just because I said I want to get a look at him. Hurts just isn’t the answer. Might as well see if Minshew can be. Chances are he isn’t,  but at least see what the offense can do with a QB who is a better passer. 
 

Even if he’s not the future, maybe a QB who can throw the ball helps us learn more about guys like Smith and Watkins. 

I'm not sure if you qualify as a beanbagger or not, but your thought process seems to show that you don't understand that you can't reference other QBs in this topic.  #beanieweenie doesn't like that.

16 minutes ago, nipples said:

I’ve never pumped up Minshew so not sure how I "love him” just because I said I want to get a look at him. Hurts just isn’t the answer. Might as well see if Minshew can be. Chances are he isn’t,  but at least see what the offense can do with a QB who is a better passer. 
 

Even if he’s not the future, maybe a QB who can throw the ball helps us learn more about guys like Smith and Watkins. 

Mishew isn’t the answer as such he’s a waste of time. There’s no point in "seeing him,” because we already know what he is. The bottom line is the answer is either Hurts or it’s someone not already on the roster. Hopefully they can find that guy over the next few drafts. If Minshew were the "answer” then the Jags don’t dump the guy for 6th round pick nor do they draft Lawrence. 

32 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Did I say he was out?  Do you even know the difference?  
 

I don't think he is hurt....if he threw 3 TD instead of 3 INT against the Giants....I guarantee the ankle "injury" would have been nothing at this point.  I wouldn't be stunned if they us this as a reason to bench him to see what the other crappy QB has.  They did it when Wentz was struggling in 2018 when he had a real injury.  

So you’re clueless got it. 

It’s hilarious. Half of you say Roseman couldn’t find talent to save his life, but ASSume he’s the ONLY GM in football smart enough to see Gardner Mishew can be the guy. 😂🤣😂

Oh and the team that simply benched Carson Wentz has to come up with an elaborate scheme of a fake injury to bench Jalen Hurts? 🤣😂🤣 Taters gonna Tate. 

26 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

No one thinks Minshew is the guy either, moron.  They just know that Hurts is not a good pro QB.  Guy does not have the arm.  He’s Tebow 2.0. 

He seems to have an issue with guys like Wentz and Minshew. Ulterior motive? Or are we the only ones that can be questioned?

Imagine being petrified of Gardner Minshew playing lol 

6 hours ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

No one thinks Minshew is the guy either, moron.  They just know that Hurts is not a good pro QB.  Guy does not have the arm.  He’s Tebow 2.0. 

Then you’re still wasting time you idiot. Minshew is basically Trevor Siemian yet you fools are acting like he’s some savior. Aren’t you the same dope who knows Hurts is benched, but really knows nothing at all? 😂🤣😂🥲