Just now, downundermike said:

 

 

 

I didn’t say all interceptions and incompletions are god awful passes. This is called arguing in bad faith. You know damn well that’s not what I meant.

2 minutes ago, vaff said:

I didn’t say all interceptions and incompletions are god awful passes. This is called arguing in bad faith. You know damn well that’s not what I meant.

But you did say a god awful pass is incomplete or an interception. I bolded it here.

18 minutes ago, vaff said:

A god awful pass is incomplete or an interception. Plain and simple. The fact Devonta was able to catch the pass flatout indicates it wasn’t god awful.

Maybe you should watch Tua vs the chargers if you want to see some god awful passes.

Nick Foles threw a god awful pass against the Falcons, and it was a completion.  So you are wrong.

Hurts threw a god awful pass against the Commode doors and it was intercepted.

 

1 minute ago, downundermike said:

But you did say a god awful pass is incomplete or an interception. I bolded it here.

Trees are plants.

A Lilly is a plant.

This does not mean a Lilly is a tree.

 

2 minutes ago, Aerolithe_Lion said:

Trees are plants.

A Lilly is a plant.

This does not mean a Lilly is a tree.

 

Not sure how that applies.  He said

A god awful pass is incomplete or an interception. Plain and simple.

This is a god awful pass, and it is neither incomplete or an interception.

 

The ones who WASHED the most still secretly hate 🤣🤣🤣

4 minutes ago, downundermike said:

Not sure how that applies.  He said

A god awful pass is incomplete or an interception. Plain and simple.

This is a god awful pass, and it is neither incomplete or an interception.

 

How does that relate to this question?

 

18 minutes ago, downundermike said:

Question, is this a god awful pass ???

 

 

 

7 minutes ago, Aerolithe_Lion said:

How does that relate to this question?

Because that was my reply to his initial statement.

11 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Finally....someone man enough to show their true colors.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BTW

 

 

You're projecting.  

This is exactly what a racist would say.  

Honestly, F you, as well. I never called anyone here a racist. If you don’t think there are actual racists out there who dislike Hurts, because he’s black, you’re delusional.

And while I didn’t call anyone here a racist, the fact that you idiots can’t handle the introspection the word creates, leaves me with a lot of questions. 

32 minutes ago, vaff said:

You guys are honestly pathetic. The only people hating on Hurts right now are either: 1) Too insecure to admit they were wrong. 2) Wentz fanboys 3) racists.

Well

1.  I have admitted I was wrong

2.  Why are we talking about the Colts former QB

3. So I guess you are saying I am racist seeing as there are 3 options and 1/2 do not apply to me.

3 minutes ago, downundermike said:

Because that was my reply to his initial statement.

And that’s what I was replying to. It can be a not terrible pass and still be picked, just as a terrible pass could be caught in your example

13 minutes ago, Aerolithe_Lion said:

Trees are plants.

A Lilly is a plant.

This does not mean a Lilly is a tree.

 

He’s being purposely dishonest. It’s what people do when they have no argument.

He knows I didn’t say all interceptions and incompletions are god awful passes. And his attempt to use completely fluke completions to prove that completions can also  be god awful passes is once again, purposely dishonest. 

1 minute ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Whatever you say

 

 

 

 

 

 

racist 

Why don’t you go post another laugh emoji on a post you disagree with, weirdo.

2 minutes ago, downundermike said:

Well

1.  I have admitted I was wrong

2.  Why are we talking about the Colts former QB

3. So I guess you are saying I am racist seeing as there are 3 options and 1/2 do not apply to me.

You are clearly a Wentz fanboy. Your actions after the 2020 season make it pretty clear.

9 minutes ago, vaff said:

He’s being purposely dishonest. It’s what people do when they have no argument.

He knows I didn’t say all interceptions and incompletions are god awful passes. And his attempt to use completely fluke completions to prove that completions can also  be god awful passes is once again, purposely dishonest. 

But you said all god awful passes are interceptions or incompletions.

Once again, you are wrong.

7 minutes ago, vaff said:

You are clearly a Wentz fanboy. Your actions after the 2020 season make it pretty clear.

I have not mentioned, discussed, or brought up Carson Wentz since, god I don't even know.

It is those that hate him who are obsessed.

12 minutes ago, vaff said:

You are clearly a Wentz fanboy. Your actions after the 2020 season make it pretty clear.

And yeah, my bad, how dare I defend an Eagles player, such a bad fan.

Maybe if the guy got some help, a guy like AJ Brown, instead of  the two clowns that got ran out of town this off season.

Regardless, he is gone, Hurts is the guy, and I fully expect the Eagles to win the Super Bowl this year, because the EAGLES are a really good football team.

4 minutes ago, downundermike said:

But you said all god awful passes are interceptions or incompletions.

Once again, you are wrong.

Fine. Any pass that’s first contact is hitting a receiver square in the hands is not a god awful pass.

One question for folks, why is it a sin to say anything negative about Hurts, but the guy who coordinates the #2 defense in yards allowed and #7 in points allowed gets killed on this board daily but that is OK.

 

4 minutes ago, vaff said:

Fine. Any pass that’s first contact is hitting a receiver square in the hands is not a god awful pass.

I disagree, and this is what would have happened to Devonta if that safety wasn't a p&ssy.

 

1 minute ago, downundermike said:

I disagree, and this is what would have happened to Devonta if that safety wasn't a p&ssy.

 

Ahh yes - the good old days when real tackling was allowed 

Just now, mikemack8 said:

Ahh yes - the good old days when real tackling was allowed 

Real tackling? What's that again?

5 minutes ago, downundermike said:

I have not mentioned, discussed, or brought up Carson Wentz since, god I don't even know.

It is those that hate him who are obsessed.

Dude, you clearly had a bias towards Wentz at that time. You guys were celebrating when Doug got fired, because you thought it meant Wentz was totally staying. 
 

It’s not worth my time. If you want to think I lumped you in with Wentz fanboys or racists, I don’t care. 

5 minutes ago, downundermike said:

One question for folks, why is it a sin to say anything negative about Hurts, but the guy who coordinates the #2 defense in yards allowed and #7 in points allowed gets killed on this board daily but that is OK.

 

I’m one of the very few people here who ever defends Gannon. The hate for him makes no sense to me.

2 minutes ago, vaff said:

I’m one of the very few people here who ever defends Gannon. The hate for him makes no sense to me.

Eye test for the most part. Though i will say the last few weeks (bar the GB game) his D has been excellent. I'm still just not sure if it's him or if it's the talent though. I guess on that basis credit goes to both the scheme and the players. 

5 minutes ago, vaff said:

I’m one of the very few people here who ever defends Gannon. The hate for him makes no sense to me.

You sure don't defend anything said about him the way you defend Hurts, maybe I should come up with 3 options why