June 16, 20214 yr 4 hours ago, vikas83 said: I mean, apparently Google searches are difficult for Tucker. Using the term unindicted co-conspirator proves it 100% was NOT an undercover agent. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/06/16/tucker-carlsons-tinfoil-hat-theory-blaming-fbi-jan-6/?utm_campaign=wp_main&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter So in looking into this more, this appears to just be word salad from "legal experts." They're essentially saying that FBI agents can't be charged with conspiracy because they were just doing their jobs and not guilty of a crime. There doesn't seem to be anything that prohibits the government from labeling informants or agents "unindicted co-conspirators." This is the WaPo running cover for democRATS yet again.
June 16, 20214 yr 5 minutes ago, Kz! said: So in looking into this more, this appears to just be word salad from "legal experts." They're essentially saying that FBI agents can't be charged with conspiracy because they were just doing their jobs and not guilty of a crime. There doesn't seem to be anything that prohibits the government from labeling informants or agents "unindicted co-conspirators." This is the WaPo running cover for democRATS yet again. Apparently the unindicted co-conspirator Tucker claims is an FBI informant was actually the guy's wife, Sharon Caldwell
June 16, 20214 yr 4 minutes ago, Mike030270 said: Haven't looked in here since April. Did anyone get convicted? Nah. Trump pardoned them all.
June 16, 20214 yr Author 25 minutes ago, Mike030270 said: Haven't looked in here since April. Did anyone get convicted? Yes, two convictions and some other changes to pleas of guilty.
June 16, 20214 yr 1 hour ago, Kz! said: So in looking into this more, this appears to just be word salad from "legal experts." They're essentially saying that FBI agents can't be charged with conspiracy because they were just doing their jobs and not guilty of a crime. There doesn't seem to be anything that prohibits the government from labeling informants or agents "unindicted co-conspirators." This is the WaPo running cover for democRATS yet again. How many times are you going to fall for this far right media BS? I say this as a close, close friend...just give up, it's not gonna end well.
June 17, 20214 yr 2 hours ago, Kz! said: So in looking into this more, this appears to just be word salad from "legal experts." They're essentially saying that FBI agents can't be charged with conspiracy because they were just doing their jobs and not guilty of a crime. There doesn't seem to be anything that prohibits the government from labeling informants or agents "unindicted co-conspirators." This is the WaPo running cover for democRATS yet again. Exhibit K of how watching FOX News turns you into a categorical moron and absolute chump.
June 17, 20214 yr 1 hour ago, Green Dog said: Exhibit K of how watching FOX News turns you into a categorical moron and absolute chump. In no way had anyone debunked anything about the piece or segment. New piece from revolver dropping Monday! Getcha popcorn ready!
June 17, 20214 yr 42 minutes ago, Kz! said: yadda, yadda... *more tweets from right wing extremists that prove nothing*... yadda yadda... I'm a tool... Btw, c***brain, I just heard that just tonight on your precious Fox News that Trump just gave his official concession speech to Sean Hannity. Bout' time, eh?
June 17, 20214 yr Fing scum A Republican congressman refused to shake hands with a DC police officer beaten by Trump loyalists on Jan. 6, according to 2 House members Rep. Andrew Clyde, a Georgia Republican who has downplayed the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, refused to shake hands with Michael Fanone, a Washington, DC Metropolitan police officer who was assaulted by pro-Trump rioters while protecting the Capitol, two members of Congress announced on Wednesday. Rep. Eric Swalwell, a California Democrat, tweeted that Fanone approached Clyde at the Capitol and introduced himself as "someone who fought to defend the Capitol," but Clyde refused to shake his outstretched hand. Rep. Adam Kinzinger, an Illinois Republican, tweeted shortly after that he'd called Fanone and "confirmed" the story. "Officer Fanone just ran into @Rep_Clyde at Capitol (he's the "Jan 6 was a typical tour" guy). Fanone introduced himself as 'someone who fought to defend the Capitol' and put out his hand," Swalwell tweeted. "Clyde refused to shake it. To honor Trump, @housegop will dishonor the police." Kinzinger added that the officer told him he also had a "disrespectful" interaction with a different lawmaker's chief of staff. https://www.businessinsider.com/gop-congressman-refuses-handshake-with-dc-police-officer-attacked-on-jan-6-2021-6
June 17, 20214 yr 10 hours ago, Kz! said: In no way had anyone debunked anything about the piece or segment. New piece from revolver dropping Monday! Getcha popcorn ready!
June 17, 20214 yr 21 minutes ago, Kz! said: Tucker responds to the "debunkers:" King ish. You have a tendency to worship people that humiliate you. It's weird and Freudian.
June 17, 20214 yr 3 minutes ago, Dave Moss said: These stories with Tucker Carlson all end the same way. KING ISH
June 17, 20214 yr Trumplican Scum21 Republican lawmakers vote against honoring law enforcement for their work during the Jan. 6 Capitol riot More than 20 GOP lawmakers voted against a bill awarding law enforcement officers the highest congressional honor for their work during the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. Not a single House Democrat opposed the measure, which passed with the overwhelming support of 406 members. A few Republican lawmakers took issue with calling the storming of the Capitol an "insurrection."
June 17, 20214 yr 35 minutes ago, Dave Moss said: These stories with Tucker Carlson all end the same way. Tucker Carlson is human scum.
June 17, 20214 yr 1 minute ago, jsdarkstar said: Tucker Carlson is human scum. He's an entertainer who gets great ratings by playing a character. The blame belongs with his viewers. He is giving them what they want.
June 17, 20214 yr 2 minutes ago, vikas83 said: He's an entertainer who gets great ratings by playing a character. The blame belongs with his viewers. He is giving them what they want. I wonder at what point do Tucker, Hannity, et all have any responsibility for what they put out there?
June 17, 20214 yr 2 minutes ago, Gannan said: I wonder at what point do Tucker, Hannity, et all have any responsibility for what they put out there? They don't. They make clear legally that they are not news, and they don't hold themselves out to be so. I mean...does SNL or Maher have responsibility for the impact they have on viewers? Personal responsibility is the key. People are free to go on TV and say ridiculous crap. Pretty sure that's like 95% of all television. Unless they directly incite or instruct violence, it's protected.
Create an account or sign in to comment