21 hours ago21 hr 2 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:Yep. He’s there in front and then moves off to the side. She turns the wheel away from him before hitting the gas. All confirmed. He isn’t going to get hit. In any case, the first shot is where it gets tricky. The other two are clearly illegal.Sounded like "contact made".
21 hours ago21 hr Just now, DrPhilly said:I’m more or less head both sider in here along with a few others and trust me you are NOT a both sider.Depends on the topic I don't pretend when Im not.
21 hours ago21 hr 5 minutes ago, lynched1 said:Sounded like "contact made".Dude was walking fine and no limp just seconds afterward. Maybe he got grazed or maybe he kicked the car.
21 hours ago21 hr 2 hours ago, The_Omega said:So Democrats have settled on gaslighting and outright lying, no surprise there. The video is clear that she was ordered out of the car then resisted and tried to speed off, hitting the officer with the front corner of the car. That is all proven by the video but Democrats just lie and claim it isn’t.Your self awareness is down 600%
21 hours ago21 hr Awwwww he hugged a protestor that wasn't trying to run him over. ❤️How long until the rage monsters out her and burn down her house?
21 hours ago21 hr 4 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:Dude was walking fine and no limp just seconds afterward. Maybe he got grazed or maybe he kicked the car.Maybe she hit him with it after she jumped on the throttle to avoid arrest.Hmm...
21 hours ago21 hr Just now, lynched1 said:Maybe she hit him with it after she jumped on the throttle to avoid rest.Hmm...Yeah probably not since he wasn’t injured and his movement wasn’t affected either. I think he kicked her car. He obviously didn’t like her. Kicked her car, shot her 3x, and then called her a ****. Probably stalked her down the street as well. Bet he hates bisexuals.
21 hours ago21 hr Just now, DrPhilly said:Yeah probably not since he wasn’t injured and his movement wasn’t affected either. I think he kicked her car. He obviously didn’t like her. Kicked her car, shot her 3x, and then called her a ****. Probably stalked her down the street as well. Bet he hates bisexuals.So your saying it was ok he got hit. Adrenaline is a potent painkiller as well. I know this as fact.
21 hours ago21 hr Just now, lynched1 said:So your saying it was ok he got hit.Adrenaline is a potent painkiller as well. I know this as fact.Nah, I’m saying he kicked her car.He wasn’t even knocked off balance. Whatever touch he received was extremely minor. I don’t feel bad for him. He is fine and won’t get prosecuted.
20 hours ago20 hr 20 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:Nah, I’m saying he kicked her car.He wasn’t even knocked off balance. Whatever touch he received was extremely minor. I don’t feel bad for him. He is fine and won’t get prosecuted.I don't feel bad for either one of them, they were doing their jobs.Edit: I just saw an even better video clip. Now I just have to find a usable link.
17 hours ago17 hr 4 hours ago, lynched1 said:You'll pick it up soon enough.Dude is hammered by 6:30, like the loser at the end of the bar sitting alone and mumbling to himself about her driving from 5 hours away.
17 hours ago17 hr 20 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:Dude is hammered by 6:30, like the loser at the end of the bar sitting alone and mumbling to himself about her driving from 5 hours away.No garage sodas tonight. Still got the weekend.
13 hours ago13 hr 7 hours ago, lynched1 said:I don't feel bad for either one of them, they were doing their jobs.Edit: I just saw an even better video clip. Now I just have to find a usable link.Here is how I see it.Good was not trying to run over Ross. That is completely obvious by the way Good turns the wheel. Ross is clearing to the side of the car as Good starts to move. It is unclear if the car touches Ross but if it does it is a light graze (perhaps a little push) and Ross is not knocked off balance and not injured. All the shots are fired with Ross clear of the car. The first shot is within the split second of time where it may be reasonable to give Ross the benefit of the doubt that he erroneously believes he is in mortal danger. The 2nd and 3rd shots are purely horrible judgement on the part of Ross. Good is by no means a danger to anyone at any point once she turns the wheel away from Ross. The entire incident is tragic and unfortunate. The response from the WH and 90% of Repubs is despicable and dishonest. Some on the left are recklessly screaming "murder” when the facts point to manslaughter though most are calling for a proper investigation. Legally, the event is in part quite murky but also the type of "bang bang” situation (no pun intended) that is regularly dealt with in the courts. A transparent and objective legal process with neutral experts advising is called for. Alas, we get everything but that which is par for the course with MAGA and Trump.
11 hours ago11 hr The response from MAGA and co has nothing to do with justice or even about illegals.It's about inflicting pain on "liberals" and enforcing their will upon them.It's about power. Flexing on the left. That's it.That is why they cheer on and support ICE shooting a mother of two. They don't see leftists as human beings.
4 hours ago4 hr 8 hours ago, DrPhilly said:Here is how I see it.Good was not trying to run over Ross. That is completely obvious by the way Good turns the wheel. Ross is clearing to the side of the car as Good starts to move. It is unclear if the car touches Ross but if it does it is a light graze (perhaps a little push) and Ross is not knocked off balance and not injured. All the shots are fired with Ross clear of the car. The first shot is within the split second of time where it may be reasonable to give Ross the benefit of the doubt that he erroneously believes he is in mortal danger. The 2nd and 3rd shots are purely horrible judgement on the part of Ross. Good is by no means a danger to anyone at any point once she turns the wheel away from Ross.The entire incident is tragic and unfortunate. The response from the WH and 90% of Repubs is despicable and dishonest. Some on the left are recklessly screaming "murder” when the facts point to manslaughter though most are calling for a proper investigation. Legally, the event is in part quite murky but also the type of "bang bang” situation (no pun intended) that is regularly dealt with in the courts. A transparent and objective legal process with neutral experts advising is called for. Alas, we get everything but that which is par for the course with MAGA and Trump.Yeah, the second and third shot aren't good, but at the same time they were right behind the first shot, and he stopped at three. A lot of the determination needs to come from the training practices up until that point. From a statistical standpoint, three rounds is still less than the average fired in a modern officer involved shooting. (Back in the single action revolver days of the 70s and 80s when this stuff was first starting to be computed, average engagements were around 3-4 rounds per, however since the adoption of semi-automatics the round counts went up to around 6 per officer per engagement.) I can't speak to his agencies training practices, so I'm not sure what their training regimen looks like. When I was on quals varied from department from department, and even sometimes between events in one particular qualification course. The usual was five rounds at this distance, five rounds at this distance, etc. In and of itself firearms training w/i LE is just horrid. A plurality of officers only fire their weapons in training once or twice a year. During that time I myself ran in IDPA style competitions, and the courses of fire were way better designed in terms of round counts per target (usually two), use of shoot/no shoot targets, and moving around.It's possible as a defense he could argue w/r/t the second and third shots that he was also in fear of harm to anyone else down the street, but I haven't seen any video, photo, or testimonial evidence of anyone else being down the path, so I can't speak to if that line of defense is even applicable.If there is a prosecutable crime, more than likely it'd be some type of voluntary manslaughter.
4 hours ago4 hr 17 hours ago, DrPhilly said:I’m more or less head both sider in here along with a few others and trust me you are NOT a both sider.If you were a true both-sider then to one side or the other you would appear to be a moron about 50% of the time. But you’re a dope more like 90% of the time.
3 hours ago3 hr I think it's very clear from his own video that the shots were fired out of malice, not over concern about personal safety. He stopped at three because he shot her from inches away and knew she was done.
Create an account or sign in to comment