Jump to content

Featured Replies

23 hours ago, mikemack8 said:

Careful - with talk like this you'll be labeled a bigot

Ironically, I've been called a whole lot more worse things on the internet and I could have been a whole less polite. But I don't have the time or energy to get back into all that nonsense (at the moment).

But yeah, it's interesting to observe how often the bigot label is thrown around and a lack of any solutions other than "I don't like that" if someone pushes back on the current immigration narratives..

 

  • Replies 6.1k
  • Views 119.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • It's not that complicated to figure out what needs to be done, but neither side is willing to do them. 1. End all benefits for Illegals -- no more drivers licenses, no welfare, no Obamacare, etc.

  • The border has been a catastrophe for 20+ years now, and seemingly no one in Washington is willing to actually address the problems. Republicans talk tough and use 7th century solutions (and still som

  • LOL. You idiots let your wives have political opinions. 

Posted Images

4 hours ago, UK Eagle said:

But yeah, it's interesting to observe how often the bigot label is thrown around and a lack of any solutions other than "I don't like that" if someone pushes back on the current immigration narratives..

Here in the US, the lack of solutions other than, "I don’t like that” is from the extreme right. People are not labeled bigots because they are against illegal immigration, they are labeled bigots because of their hate filled rhetoric and lack of any solutions other than complete closure of the border. 
 

Aside from the immigration/border bill that the current administration submitted the day they took office, there is a bi-partisan bill in congress that was rejected for purely political reasons. 

2 hours ago, Tnt4philly said:

Aside from the immigration/border bill that the current administration submitted the day they took office, there is a bi-partisan bill in congress that was rejected for purely political reasons. 

They rejected it because it's a bad deal for reasons that have been discussed ad nauseum in here. 

 

it was rejected because orange man didn't want to give Biden a win in an election year. 

44 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

it was rejected because orange man didn't want to give Biden a win in an election year. 

Yeah we can stop pretending it was for any other reason when he literally came out and admitted that's why he broadcast to the rest of the GQP to shoot it down. Trumpbots love nothing more than to be humiliated and hung out to dry by Dear Leader over and over again.

4x the amount of money to fund forever wars, additional green card handouts, allowing illegals to get immediate work visas while they wait for their court dates. It was just the greatest deal ever that orangeman had to stop because it would have been such a huge win for slurry. :lol: 

They really do just mindlessly repeat whatever the TV says. 

1 hour ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

it was rejected because orange man didn't want to give Biden a win in an election year. 

Everyone with half a brain knows that, the rest are conformist half men whose wives make them go to Hanson concerts. 

4 minutes ago, Kz! said:

4x the amount of money to fund forever wars, additional green card handouts, allowing illegals to get immediate work visas while they wait for their court dates. It was just the greatest deal ever that orangeman had to stop because it would have been such a huge win for slurry. :lol: 

They really do just mindlessly repeat whatever the TV says. 

The first and only time Kz thinks Trump is lying  :roll: 

7 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

Everyone with half a brain knows that, the rest are conformist half men whose wives make them go to Hanson concerts. 

It's hilarious how salty that data point has made liberal "men." :lol: 

2 minutes ago, Kz! said:

It's hilarious how salty that data point has made liberal "men." :lol: 

It's hilarious that you need "data points" and a woman with no esteem to "conform" for you in order to feel masculine.  😄 

9 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

It's hilarious that you need "data points" and a woman with no esteem to "conform" for you in order to feel masculine.  😄 

I never said I needed that to feel masculine just that that is generally what happens. That's just projection on your part likely stemming from insecurities about your own household situation - where your wife is the head of the household/provider and the "male" takes on the more traditionally feminine role. 

To recap the last day of back and forth between me and the housewife for anyone interested:

Kz: Conservative men are typically the head of their households, the breadwinners, and have wives who conform to their political opinions.

Male liberal whose wife provides for him and his kids while he sits at home acting like a beech in CVON: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

:roll: 

1 minute ago, Kz! said:

I never said I needed that to feel masculine just that that is generally what happens. That's just projection on your part likely stemming from insecurities about your own household situation - where your wife is the head of the household/provider and the "male" takes on the more traditionally feminine role. 

Half your posts are you mumbling about masculinity and testosterone. It reads like you are begging the world to acknowledge you are a man lmao. 

5 hours ago, Tnt4philly said:

Here in the US, the lack of solutions other than, "I don’t like that” is from the extreme right. People are not labeled bigots because they are against illegal immigration, they are labeled bigots because of their hate filled rhetoric and lack of any solutions other than complete closure of the border. 
 

Aside from the immigration/border bill that the current administration submitted the day they took office, there is a bi-partisan bill in congress that was rejected for purely political reasons. 

From the little I know of that specific bill, the news sites over here reported there was funding for Ukraine, Israel, etc in that bipartisan border deal. There wasn't a single bill to resolve the issue? That correct?

We are trying to get a specific bill through the legislature to deport the people to Rwanda for processing, but the "no solutioners" are trying to stop it while offering nothing in return.  They claim Rwanda isn't safe.  The best we can do is return people to Albania and hope they don't come back.

2 minutes ago, Kz! said:

To recap the last day of back and forth between me and the housewife for anyone interested:

Kz: Conservative men are typically the head of their households, the breadwinners, and have wives who conform to their political opinions.

Male liberal whose wife provides for him and his kids while he sits at home acting like a beech in CVON: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

:roll: 

For a man whose bloodline is going to end with his death, this is hilarious. 

1 minute ago, Boogyman said:

Half your posts are you mumbling about masculinity and testosterone. It reads like you are begging the world to acknowledge you are a man lmao. 

his imaginary wife from canada thinks he's mucho macho!  :flex:  

2 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

Half your posts are you mumbling about masculinity and testosterone. It reads like you are begging the world to acknowledge you are a man lmao. 

Half your posts are you whining about me posting verifiable data about those things. Does the data hurt your feelings, housewife?

1 minute ago, Boogyman said:

For a man whose bloodline is going to end with his death, this is hilarious. 

This is funny because you're wrong about literally everything. :lol: 

8 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Half your posts are you whining about me posting verifiable data about those things. Does the data hurt your feelings, housewife?

This is funny because you're wrong about literally everything. :lol: 

So you do keep repeating it over and over again? That is also not the flex you think it is lol. "I am too a man, and I have a pie chart to prove it!" 🤣

Much like segregation, Pop Pop's bringing back the long ago eradicated diseases!

Tuberculosis outbreak at Chicago migrant shelters sparks urgent contact tracing as officials say a FIFTH of Latin American arrivals carry the disease

17 minutes ago, UK Eagle said:

From the little I know of that specific bill, the news sites over here reported there was funding for Ukraine, Israel, etc in that bipartisan border deal. There wasn't a single bill to resolve the issue? That correct?

The bill that addressed the border and immigration, also included funding for Ukraine and Israel. Most bills in the US address multiple issues. The fact is, this bill was killed for politics and politics alone because the MAGA GOP didn’t want Biden to have a win.

 

58 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

So you do keep repeating it over and over again? That is also not the flex you think it is lol. "I am too a man, and I have a pie chart to prove it!" 🤣

Aww, did the data hurt your feelings, housewife, or just hit too close to home? Little bit of column A and B, I imagine. Show me on the doll where the data hurt you. :lol: 

49 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Aww, did the data hurt your feelings, housewife, or just hit too close to home? Little bit of column A and B, I imagine. Show me on the doll where the data hurt you. :lol: 

"Look Ma, this graph right here proves I'm a man, Ma!"

15 hours ago, Tnt4philly said:

The bill that addressed the border and immigration, also included funding for Ukraine and Israel. Most bills in the US address multiple issues. The fact is, this bill was killed for politics and politics alone because the MAGA GOP didn’t want Biden to have a win.

 

I can only state the obvious and suggest if something was so urgent, it could be done within a single limited scope bill, to be expedited through the legislature.  Adding other conditions or items could come across as leveraging an item someone desperately want, to get what you want somewhere else, rather than a desire to solve the core issue. Politics and all that.

But it's not my circus and not my monkey to deal with.  We have enough of our problems over here.

 

Oh look, the thing that isn't happening is happening again.

Honestly, how brainwashed do you have to be to still be a liberal in 2024? Who actually thinks it's beneficial to bring in plane loads of Haitians and give them free money. What possible benefit could there be? But hey, if the tv says it's good, that's all that really matters.

Create an account or sign in to comment