47 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

I'm not doing that. You asked and I answered how I feel about it.

Right, and you answered and I'm explaining what your answers mean and what they say about you. You say "I don't care" and that is very obvious. You don't but down the road you'll regret it as life has a way of coming back at you and giving you just what you deserve.

6 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

Right, and you answered and I'm explaining what your answers mean and what they say about you. You say "I don't care" and that is very obvious. You don't but down the road you'll regret it as life has a way of coming back at you and giving you just what you deserve.

OK. I'm not worried about that either. In 1300 days hopefully Vance keeps the restoration of America going.

50 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Sifting through a 6 post search result is very time consuming. I was up until 5am before I threw the towel in and called it a night.

Every search is time consuming when you don't know what a boolean operator is.

4 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

OK. I'm not worried about that either. In 1300 days hopefully Vance keeps the restoration of America going.

Of course you aren't. There is big trouble ahead for you my friend. I feel bad for you but you will have earned all of it.

Just now, DrPhilly said:

Of course you aren't. There is big trouble ahead for you my friend. I feel bad for you but you will have earned all of it.

Got it

Sacrificing some of your rights just so all illegals plus some citizens can be rounded up is an odd take from the so called law and order maga

4 minutes ago, Bill said:

Every search is time consuming when you don't know what a boolean operator is.

Even then who has the desire and time to search old posts to try and own someone on a forum because your life is that miserable and empty

especially when you only have to search the current page.

1 hour ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Sifting through a 6 post search result is very time consuming. I was up until 5am before I threw the towel in and called it a night.

Awesome! Sounds like a really big night for a totally normal and stable dude!

3 hours ago, DrPhilly said:

@Diehardfan did you vote for this behavior?

Yet another reason Stephen Miller needs to be run out of DC on a rail.

8 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

Got it

Good, learn it live it

1 minute ago, BBE said:

Yet another reason Stephen Miller needs to be run out of DC on a rail.

He's the absolute worst dude in the admin since he is actually very smart and dangerous. Almost all of the others are just buffoons.

11 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

Of course you aren't. There is big trouble ahead for you my friend. I feel bad for you but you will have earned all of it.

Dark forces of karmic retribution are coming to you if you believe in squints deporting illegal aliens @Diehardfan! Repent now!

2 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

He's the absolute worst dude in the admin since he is actually very smart and dangerous. Almost all of the others are just buffoons.

And he is solely focused on deportation with no accounting for the costs.

The commies still build straw-men while giving away their due process. They must all think they’re going to be commanders in Gilead. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

50 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Awesome! Sounds like a really big night for a totally normal and stable dude!

It's no outdoor Hanson concert, that's for sure

1 hour ago, Mike030270 said:

Sacrificing some of your rights just so all illegals plus some citizens can be rounded up is an odd take from the so called law and order maga

That's how collectivism works

CATO report out on ICE since Trump took over. 65% of the people detained were not previously convicted of any crime and 93% were not previously convicted of any violent crimes.

I don't think most of the Trump voters understood what this would look like.

50 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

CATO report out on ICE since Trump took over. 65% of the people detained were not previously convicted of any crime and 93% were not previously convicted of any violent crimes.

I don't think most of the Trump voters understood what this would look like.

You know what it is like here. Lots of migrants coming and going. Most farms now actually work towards either having them here temporarily or providing them services to bring their families here. Not saying it's great, but our LOCAL officials are what has made it work along with needing ICE. There were times that MS13 was prevalent, but not anymore. The township is giving permits out for food trucks like crazy. You can get a taco every 100 ft! And grocery stores. They are here to stay, they are not criminals, they are working and becoming legal, and they are contributing to our community. Paying taxes, becoming property owners, etc. Unlike the days when there was a car crash and you'd see them all running from the scene. I do believe orange man is leaving the farmers alone. For now.

6 hours ago, Kz! said:

To be fair, most of the stuff you dig up on twitter is far left propaganda anyway. I mean, do you really think a bunch of ICE dudes just saw a brown business owner and jumped him and started punching him in the head or do you think something happened before the 45 second video started?

The simple answer to your bolded question is "Hell yes!” Here in our quiet suburban Northern California community, ICE has been cruising the streets looking for landscape maintenance crews and jumping out of their vehicle when the find a crew working and accosting the workers demanding to see their documents and hauling off any workers who don’t have their documents on them. The only thing that most of the workers can be charged with is mowing the grass too short or pruning the shrubs too severely. ICE treats them all as guilty until proven innocent.

The answer to your final question is, "I don’t have any evidence to know for sure, but my suspicion is the answer is "No.”. By law police are supposed to turn on their body cameras before a confrontation begins, so anything prior to the 45 seconds should be on the video.

24 minutes ago, mattwill said:

The simple answer to your bolded question is "Hell yes!” Here in our quiet suburban Northern California community, ICE has been cruising the streets looking for landscape maintenance crews and jumping out of their vehicle when the find a crew working and accosting the workers demanding to see their documents and hauling off any workers who don’t have their documents on them. The only thing that most of the workers can be charged with is mowing the grass too short or pruning the shrubs too severely. ICE treats them all as guilty until proven innocent.

The answer to your final question is, "I don’t have any evidence to know for sure, but my suspicion is the answer is "No.”. By law police are supposed to turn on their body cameras before a confrontation begins, so anything prior to the 45 seconds should be on the video.

Feds are governed by their own policies, not those of CA, while making arrests.

2 hours ago, DrPhilly said:

CATO report out on ICE since Trump took over. 65% of the people detained were not previously convicted of any crime and 93% were not previously convicted of any violent crimes.

I don't think most of the Trump voters understood what this would look like.

Not you specifically, but others have said today that people who voted for Trump didn't vote for this.

So the same people who think Trump voters are idiots and can't understand why people would ever vote for Trump or why people would still support him are suddenly Trump voter whispers who understand them enough to speak on their behalf.

2 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

Not you specifically, but others have said today that people who voted for Trump didn't vote for this.

So the same people who think Trump voters are idiots and can't understand why people would ever vote for Trump or why people would still support him are suddenly Trump voter whispers who understand them enough to speak on their behalf.

I’m not exactly sure what the others said but I don’t think most Trump voters expected this kind of raw overuse of force with bands of masked unidentified guys running around with very little discipline taking people down and asking questions later. Maybe that is exactly what you expected.

19 hours ago, Bill said:

"What forest?!?! There’s just trees everywhere!!”

You have chosen an apt metaphor for housing. Let’s look at that forest of yours. Housing in the US is very much like the forests of the US. The isn’t one homogeneous transcontinental forest, but rather many different regional (and local) forests. The forest(s) here in Northern California are very different from the forest in Eastern Pennsylvania and Delaware. Heck the Pine Barren forest of South Jersey is very different from those neighboring forests in Eastern PA and Delaware.

Bottom-line there is no monolithic housing "forest.”

19 hours ago, Bill said:

You’re trying to take simple problems of ish government policy and making them out to be some complex bourgeois scheme.

Ish government policy? Do you understand the history of how zoning was put into place in almost all communities? It wasn’t through top-down governmental action. It was from bottom-up meetings of neighbors. It was democracy in action. Local governments (and all zoning is local) simply became the oversight vehicle for enforcing the zoning decisions that the residents came to consensus on.

If you are going to point fingers, at least you should point them at the correct villain.

19 hours ago, Bill said:

While your at it go take a look at Delaware and overlay the map of home prices on top of new home construction and try to realize that it’s a small enough market that it completely torpedoes your point.

Such a map overlay doesn’t have to be just for Delaware. The picture is the same from coast to coast, and the reason is Return On Investment (ROI) for the developers/builders. It is simple economics that purchasing a piece of property to build on is much cheaper if the property does not have existing houses on it. Further, if a developer does purchase a redevelopment property, there is the additional cost of tearing down the existing structures. As a result, the costs to build are much higher than on undeveloped land. So nothing is torpedoed. Your map argument is interesting and factually correct, but irrelevant.

19 hours ago, Bill said:

Your posting has been condescending intellectual elitist coded enough. We don’t need you to help us plebes understand what a financial instrument is. Go take your tweed coat take somewhere else. We’re busy enough as it is dealing with the MAGAts.

I’m sorry you find having a simple economic and governmental and societal discussion so demeaning. I suspect that is your problem, not mine