Wednesday at 11:21 PM2 days 51 minutes ago, M.C. said:All of it points to a huge successful lawsuit by the family
Wednesday at 11:36 PM2 days The a-hole could have moved. Faster to side step than to draw his weapon and fire. Dude’s a dope.
Thursday at 01:02 AM2 days She put herself in a bad spot from the get go. I don't understand how people think they have the right to interfere with federal police just bc they dont agree with a policy?? I'm sure that woman was not planning on dying today. I'm sure that officer wasn't planning on having to shoot someone today. Had she stayed home or protested peacefully she would not have put herself in that predicament. She made a poor choice and paid the ultimate price for it.
Thursday at 01:14 AM2 days Here’s a pro tip. Don’t block law enforcement from doing their job, while simultaneously resisting arrest and trying to flee the scene in your motor vehicle. I’m sorry, but this lady is largely responsible for her own undoing. The agent probably didn’t need to use deadly force in response, but I believe based on the footage, he was within his right to do so. A terrible situation all around.
Thursday at 01:22 AM2 days 4 hours ago, The_Omega said:No, he was obviously pushed by the front corner panel until he got out of the way. Watch the video. He's leaning against the front when she floors it. That action will always lead to a shooting, and this will easily be found to be self-defense. Regardless, continuing to tell people to resist is what is going to lead to more of this.Are you Fing blind?!
Thursday at 01:22 AM2 days 4 hours ago, The_Omega said:No, he was obviously pushed by the front corner panel until he got out of the way. Watch the video. He's leaning against the front when she floors it. That action will always lead to a shooting, and this will easily be found to be self-defense. Regardless, continuing to tell people to resist is what is going to lead to more of this.Only a statist moron would see this and say the cops were shooting in "self defense"4 hours ago, Kz! said:Right, if they'll shoot the lady that was rapidly accelerating in the direction of an officer after just having interfered with a federal law enforcement operation, they'll shoot anyone. No one is safe anymore! Thank you!I rest my case.
Thursday at 01:24 AM2 days 4 hours ago, The_Omega said:He's in front of the vehicle when she guns it bro. Personally, I think she panicked when she realized she was under arrest, but the officer was in the path of her flight and that will always result in the action.Is your depth perception lacking old man? He's clearly next to the vehicle.Deadly force is not warranted.
Thursday at 01:24 AM2 days 21 minutes ago, Captain F said:She put herself in a bad spot from the get go. I don't understand how people think they have the right to interfere with federal police just bc they dont agree with a policy?? I'm sure that woman was not planning on dying today. I'm sure that officer wasn't planning on having to shoot someone today. Had she stayed home or protested peacefully she would not have put herself in that predicament. She made a poor choice and paid the ultimate price for it.And now the officer will pay for it with a long lasting jail sentence.
Thursday at 01:26 AM2 days 1 minute ago, JohnSnowsHair said:Is your depth perception lacking old man? He's clearly next to the vehicle.Deadly force is not warranted.There is another officer in front of the vehicle.
Thursday at 01:26 AM2 days 11 minutes ago, Blazehound said:Here’s a pro tip. Don’t block law enforcement from doing their job, while simultaneously resisting arrest and trying to flee the scene in your motor vehicle. I’m sorry, but this lady is largely responsible for her own undoing. The agent probably didn’t need to use deadly force in response, but I believe based on the footage, he was within his right to do so. A terrible situation all around.No he was not within his rights. He’s going to jail.
Thursday at 01:44 AM2 days 18 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:Is your depth perception lacking old man? He's clearly next to the vehicle.Deadly force is not warranted.You are missing the guy positioned at the front left of the vehicle. He was very much in the path of the vehicle at that moment.
Thursday at 02:13 AM2 days r/lawu/honeyhoneybean6h"The Minneapolis Woman Who was Shot in the Face and Killed by ICE Agents DID NOT try to Block the Road -- Video Shows she Attempted to YEILD to their Vehicle Before Pulling Out."https://www.reddit.com/r/law/s/Wu5h8Pp2V4
Thursday at 02:16 AM2 days 51 minutes ago, M.C. said:what about the capital police on Jan 6? standing behind them too?
Thursday at 02:28 AM2 days 43 minutes ago, Blazehound said:You are missing the guy positioned at the front left of the vehicle. He was very much in the path of the vehicle at that moment.Again:
Thursday at 02:31 AM2 days 2 minutes ago, barho said:Again:The left front wheel is directly facing and going towards the agent under the red arrow
Thursday at 02:50 AM1 day Guys it was just a 37 year old mother of a 6 year old who they murdered in cold blood. It’s not that big of a deal. Can’t we all just keep that poor masked state agent in our prayers tonight?
Thursday at 02:52 AM1 day 20 minutes ago, Blazehound said:The left front wheel is directly facing and going towards the agent under the red arrowHe fired the shots when he was already out of the way.
Thursday at 02:54 AM1 day 9 minutes ago, Blazehound said:Also, a video clearly showing she hits the agent with her vehicle:He is going to jail. And I’ll be here when he does.
Thursday at 03:20 AM1 day 16 minutes ago, barho said:He is going to jail. And I’ll be here when he does.No he won't. Officers have a lot of legal coverage at baseline, but regardless even if he was convicted do you think there is any chance in hell Trump wouldn't try to make it a federal case and just pardon the guy? He's gonna walk.
Create an account or sign in to comment