Jump to content

Featured Replies

On 9/30/2022 at 7:14 PM, Tnt4philly said:

I've been watching the new Ken Burns documentary, "America and The Holocaust". It talks about immigration quite a bit (mostly about how we wouldn't let Jews in when they were being persecuted and exterminated). Up until the 1920s we had completely open borders. My family got here in 1906 before they started restricting immigrants from Southern Europe. I suspect a lot of our families came over during that period of open borders. 

  • Replies 6.1k
  • Views 119.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • It's not that complicated to figure out what needs to be done, but neither side is willing to do them. 1. End all benefits for Illegals -- no more drivers licenses, no welfare, no Obamacare, etc.

  • The border has been a catastrophe for 20+ years now, and seemingly no one in Washington is willing to actually address the problems. Republicans talk tough and use 7th century solutions (and still som

  • LOL. You idiots let your wives have political opinions. 

Posted Images

1 hour ago, Gannan said:

I've been watching the new Ken Burns documentary, "America and The Holocaust". It talks about immigration quite a bit (mostly about how we wouldn't let Jews in when they were being persecuted and exterminated). Up until the 1920s we had completely open borders. My family got here in 1906 before they started restricting immigrants from Southern Europe. I suspect a lot of our families came over during that period of open borders. 

We started watching that series too. Pretty good so far.
 

One branch of my family came here in 1727, the other three came here in the mid 1800’s. 

TBC, I am not for completely open borders, but I do believe it should be easier to come here to work if you are not a criminal and have a job. Doesn’t even have to be permanent, circular migration would be mush easier if workers could come and go legally. 

ishlibs are still crying about Martha's Vineyard getting a little bit of color for around 48 hours lmao

We love our "safe and secure" elections, don't we, folks?

 

1 minute ago, Kz! said:

We love our "safe and secure" elections, don't we, folks?

 

Trump lost.

2 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

Trump lost.

And now the commies want non-citizens to vote lmao

41 minutes ago, Kz! said:

And now the commies want non-citizens to vote lmao

Can China mail in a billion absentee ballots?

On 10/3/2022 at 12:26 PM, Toastrel said:

Woman who allegedly helped arrange migrant flights to Martha’s Vineyard identified by CNN as former Army counterintelligence agent Perla Huerta

https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/02/us/marthas-vineyard-migrants-perla-huerta/index.html

 

Perla Huerta. I don't suppose she is somehow an immigrant or child of immigrants?

Someone should explain the diffrences between Immigration and Illegal immigration to some. 

 

Because some on the left think these are synonomous terms.  

13 minutes ago, Ipiggles said:

Someone should explain the diffrences between Immigration and Illegal immigration to some. 

 

Because some on the left think these are synonomous terms.  

Can it be you explaining the differences?

You're my intellectual hero!

1 hour ago, Kz! said:

We love our "safe and secure" elections, don't we, folks?

 

I think some states or cities already have this, but only for local elections.

5 minutes ago, Toastrel said:

Can it be you explaining the differences?

You're my intellectual hero!

I should be- since I am not the one who confuses or conflates the two...  That would be you. 

 

4 hours ago, Ipiggles said:

Someone should explain the diffrences between Immigration and Illegal immigration to some. 

 

Because some on the left think these are synonomous terms.  

The people that were shipped to MV are here legally seeking asylum. 

4 hours ago, Ipiggles said:

I should be- since I am not the one who confuses or conflates the two...  That would be you. 

 

So... you can't explain them?

On 10/3/2022 at 12:09 PM, Tnt4philly said:

TBC, I am not for completely open borders, but I do believe it should be easier to come here to work if you are not a criminal and have a job. Doesn’t even have to be permanent, circular migration would be mush easier if workers could come and go legally. 

Why would tbey go back?

1 hour ago, ToastJenkins said:

To visit and take money out of the country? Hardly a benefit to us

Studies show that migrant workers send about 15% of what they earn back home to their home country, 85% stays. They would be paying payroll taxes on their income as well as spending money in the local economies they work in. Even if they sent half of the money back home, the the half spend here doesn’t exist if the job is vacant. 

 

 

21 hours ago, Talkingbirds said:

I think some states or cities already have this, but only for local elections.

And in DC what else do they have to vote for? They don't have senators or electoral votes.

56 minutes ago, Gannan said:

And in DC what else do they have to vote for? They don't have senators or electoral votes.

In Presidential elections they do.

The District of Columbia is a political division coterminous with Washington, D.C., the capital city of the United States.[1] Since the enactment of the 23rd amendment to the Constitution in 1961,[2] it has participated in 15 presidential elections. The amendment states that the district cannot have more electoral votes than the state with the smallest number of electors.[3] Since then, it has been allocated three electoral votes in every presidential election.[4] In each of the 15 presidential elections, it has overwhelmingly voted for the Democratic Party candidate, with no margin less than 56.5 percentage points. It has been won by the losing candidate in 8 of the 15 elections

34 minutes ago, Talkingbirds said:

In Presidential elections they do.

The District of Columbia is a political division coterminous with Washington, D.C., the capital city of the United States.[1] Since the enactment of the 23rd amendment to the Constitution in 1961,[2] it has participated in 15 presidential elections. The amendment states that the district cannot have more electoral votes than the state with the smallest number of electors.[3] Since then, it has been allocated three electoral votes in every presidential election.[4] In each of the 15 presidential elections, it has overwhelmingly voted for the Democratic Party candidate, with no margin less than 56.5 percentage points. It has been won by the losing candidate in 8 of the 15 elections

And federal elections are governed by federal law which makes citizenship a requirement to vote. DC can't change that for the Presidential election. Only local.

On 10/5/2022 at 11:34 AM, Kz! said:

And now the commies want non-citizens to vote lmao

nothing new here really.  

Non citizens have been allowed to vote in many local and even some state elections for quite sometime. 
 
Up about 1900 or so, states allowed, anyone, who was an adult male, to vote regardless of citizenship. 

  • 4 weeks later...

Border Crime Wave Is Just a Right-Wing Fantasy

https://www.thedailybeast.com/border-crime-wave-is-just-a-right-wing-fantasy

Quote

As fearmongers depict the southern border as a region made lawless by invading hordes, Police Chief Victor Rodriguez of McAllen, Texas, has presided over a 12th straight year of crime reduction.

"We’re working on the 13th,” he told The Daily Beast on Friday.

In fact, crime in his border city of 145,000 is at the lowest level going back to 1985 when stats began to be accurately recorded.

"And the only reason it’s only 37 years is that’s what's on the books,” he said.

Imagine being so pathetic that this is your fantasy.

Imagine citing the Daily Beast and pretending not to be a retarded commie lmao

Create an account or sign in to comment