Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 hours ago, lynched1 said:

FB_IMG_1708814095118.jpg

I don’t know.  Ask the Italians.

  • Replies 6.1k
  • Views 119.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • It's not that complicated to figure out what needs to be done, but neither side is willing to do them. 1. End all benefits for Illegals -- no more drivers licenses, no welfare, no Obamacare, etc.

  • The border has been a catastrophe for 20+ years now, and seemingly no one in Washington is willing to actually address the problems. Republicans talk tough and use 7th century solutions (and still som

  • LOL. You idiots let your wives have political opinions. 

Posted Images

On 2/23/2024 at 7:46 PM, mayanh8 said:

It's not dumb from a "this is how free markets work in a vacuum" standpoint. You're absolutely right there. It's just dumb from a reality standpoint.

So in actual reality you do not believe there is any amount of money you could pay people to become farmers that would, in fact, entice them to become farmers?

:lol: 

13 hours ago, Tnt4philly said:

Farming in this country has always depended on immigrant and migrant labor. 

No, that is a lie.

13 hours ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

I'm not familiar enough with what a farmhand does to know how automation would play into things. So much of modern farming is automated not to a high degree, but wage pressures may create a market for further automation.

It's funny to see the same folks who claim higher minimum wages will exacerbate cause job loss to automation when fast food workers are the subject, but wage inflation to "give Americans the jobs migrants are taking" is just sound policy 😆

It is more a question of what kind of farming you are talking about. There is a big difference between corn, hardwood, blueberries, etc and the amount of automation and labor varies.

But that said, farming is a fairly high skill job. You need trade type skills to work with the equipment, you need the knowledge of how to fertilize the soil, you need to set up plans to rotate crops or plan ahead for tree harvesting schedules, etc etc etc. 

Yes, rising wages would at some point make automation more economical. So what? Fewer farmers producing more goods with greater personal wealth while keeping out lots of net negative people from our country is a GOOD thing both economically and socially.

This pathological obsession to import millions of people who will make our country tangibly, measurably, objectively worse is pure insanity.

14 hours ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

Yes, what's holding back young workers from clamoring to work on farms is ... wages.

:facepalm:

When the only tool you have is a hammer.....

 


Yes, literally, it is wages. If you hold all other inputs of the opportunity cost fixed, and just increase wages enough, I guarantee you that young Americans would flock to become farmers.

Sure, they might rather make TikTok videos all day, but if you start offering them a million bucks a year I guarantee you won’t have any shortage of American kids wanting to become farmers.

13 hours ago, JohnSnowsHair said:


Average wages for farmhands in the US is around $16/hr based on a cursory Google search. 

Let's say locking down the border and kicking out all the non-citizen migrants forces farms to double the salary. Even triple it. 

And let's say for argument's sake that all these Americans clamoring for menial jobs at good wages decide to move out to the Midwest and forgo other options like plumbing and carpentry that likewise are facing a labor shortage and wouldn't typically require the kind of physical and cultural dislocation becoming a farm worker does. :rolleyes:

What happens then? Cost of producing cash crops rises. Cost of US grown food rises. Soybean exports to China crash. 

But hey, at least we kept the beaners out right?

Prices will rise on cash crops? Good. The cost of goods and wages will not be artificially suppressed.

Soybean exports to China collapse? Good. Our enemy goes hungry and we cut another link in the ghastly Chimerica arrangement.

We get to keep out foreigners who increase our crime rates and are a net drain on public treasuries too? Good.

I’m failing to see the problem here. 

1 hour ago, barho said:

I don’t know.  Ask the Italians.

Why ask them?

9 hours ago, TEW said:

This pathological obsession to import millions of people who will make our country tangibly, measurably, objectively worse is pure insanity.

I don't know man. Quality, cheap labor that leads to lower food prices feels like a tangibly, measurably, objectively good thing.

10 hours ago, TEW said:

So in actual reality you do not believe there is any amount of money you could pay people to become farmers that would, in fact, entice them to become farmers?

:lol: 

There's no amount of money that owners of farmland/coops or management companies will pay, in reality, that will ever convince 2.4M people to leave the modern convenience of civilization to move to Iowa. You know this. That's the world we live in.

But, sure, in your imagined scorched earth, give no ground dystopian free market society I have every confidence you'd make it work.

TEW loves capitalism until it means more brown people get to work here, then he becomes Karl Marx overnight. Hate to see it.

4 hours ago, mayanh8 said:

There's no amount of money that owners of farmland/coops or management companies will pay, in reality, that will ever convince 2.4M people to leave the modern convenience of civilization to move to Iowa. You know this. That's the world we live in.

But, sure, in your imagined scorched earth, give no ground dystopian free market society I have every confidence you'd make it work.

"In reality” the market dictates the price. Even with labor.

Cut off the artificial supply of labor from foreigners and the price of labor will rise until you reach equilibrium. Then the price of those goods will rise to reach equilibrium.

THAT is reality.

Yes, lots of people will leave where they live to work farms for the right price, just like lots of people work on oil platforms. The difference is the labor price.

4 hours ago, mayanh8 said:

I don't know man. Quality, cheap labor that leads to lower food prices feels like a tangibly, measurably, objectively good thing.

The problem, again, is that they are a net cost to society. You might have marginally lower corn and soy prices, but each household of theirs is a ~$9,000 hole in the government budget, they balloon rent prices, etc etc.

So, no, they are not a tangible benefit to prices.

Former Panama border chief Oriel Ortega claims the United Nations in behind the chaos and invasion at the US border with Mexico.

A report in November found that the Biden regime is spending $451 billion a year for illegal alien and asylum seeker benefits.

what's the square root of 69?

Spoiler

ate something :lol:

 

 

2 hours ago, The_Omega said:

 

What happens when animals are allowed to run wild.

Why recover the bodies?

41 minutes ago, lynched1 said:

Why recover the bodies?

Stop creatures from you from having sex with the corpses.

1 hour ago, Toastrel said:

Stop creatures from you from having sex with the corpses.

 

FB_IMG_1706431696447.jpg

On 2/24/2024 at 8:22 AM, Tnt4philly said:

Farming in this country has always depended on immigrant and migrant labor. 

 

On 2/24/2024 at 8:41 AM, JohnSnowsHair said:


Average wages for farmhands in the US is around $16/hr based on a cursory Google search. 

Let's say locking down the border and kicking out all the non-citizen migrants forces farms to double the salary. Even triple it. 

And let's say for argument's sake that all these Americans clamoring for menial jobs at good wages decide to move out to the Midwest and forgo other options like plumbing and carpentry that likewise are facing a labor shortage and wouldn't typically require the kind of physical and cultural dislocation becoming a farm worker does. :rolleyes:

What happens then? Cost of producing cash crops rises. Cost of US grown food rises. Soybean exports to China crash. 

But hey, at least we kept the beaners out right?

 

On 2/25/2024 at 7:50 AM, mayanh8 said:

I don't know man. Quality, cheap labor that leads to lower food prices feels like a tangibly, measurably, objectively good thing.

It'll never stop being hilarious how quickly you can get sheetlibs to admit that the only potential benefit to importing millions of illegals is so they can be paid slave wages to keep food prices down. Super woke guys, great job. They're so Fing stupid. :lol: 

14 minutes ago, Kz! said:

 

 

It'll never stop being hilarious how quickly you can get sheetlibs to admit that the only potential benefit to importing millions of illegals is so they can be paid slave wages to keep food prices down. Super woke guys, great job. They're so Fing stupid. :lol: 

Step 1:  no more cheap labor

Step 2: impose a 10% tax on all imports :excited:

Step 3: ?

Step 4: very affordable prices for all Americans

:roll:

1 minute ago, VanHammersly said:

Step 1:  no more cheap labor

Step 2: impose a 10% tax on all imports :excited:

Step 3: ?

Step 4: very affordable prices for all Americans

:roll:

I know, we just can't get by without unlimited cheap labor from the third world. We'd all starve to death!

They really are this stupid, folks. :lol: 

3 minutes ago, Kz! said:

I know, we just can't get by without unlimited cheap labor from the third world. We'd all starve to death!

They really are this stupid, folks. :lol: 

I know, we just can't get by without...increasing the price of everything we eat 10 fold :excited:

46 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

I know, we just can't get by without...increasing the price of everything we eat 10 fold :excited:

Kz posts that nonsense......does he not understand what inflation would look like without that cheap labor?  What a dope.

Create an account or sign in to comment