February 28, 20241 yr 36 minutes ago, GreenReaper said: So the folks saying the reason the immigrants are pouring into the US for jobs are full of crap I guess since only the legal immigrants are doing the work. So what are all the illegals coming in for if it isn't work? Maybe you believe they are all seeking asylum. We know the people hiring workers are not all checking to see if they are here legally or not. Maybe only the farmers check to see if they are here legally so they can't work those jobs. I guess that makes sense. Nothing you said makes the slightest bit of sense. This is a word salad. Companies are allowed to get away with hiring illegals. When they are punished, the punishment is less than the price of hiring legals This is not rocket science. People come here, because it is better to be down on your luck in the USA than in any of the countries they are coming from. It isn't a difficult concept.
February 28, 20241 yr 43 minutes ago, GreenReaper said: So the folks saying the reason the immigrants are pouring into the US for jobs are full of crap I guess since only the legal immigrants are doing the work. So what are all the illegals coming in for if it isn't work? Maybe you believe they are all seeking asylum. We know the people hiring workers are not all checking to see if they are here legally or not. Maybe only the farmers check to see if they are here legally so they can't work those jobs. I guess that makes sense.
February 28, 20241 yr 44 minutes ago, GreenReaper said: So the folks saying the reason the immigrants are pouring into the US for jobs are full of crap I guess since only the legal immigrants are doing the work. So what are all the illegals coming in for if it isn't work? Maybe you believe they are all seeking asylum. We know the people hiring workers are not all checking to see if they are here legally or not. Maybe only the farmers check to see if they are here legally so they can't work those jobs. I guess that makes sense. Deep Thoughts...by Jack Handy
February 28, 20241 yr 33 minutes ago, GreenReaper said: That's the kind of response I would expect. I'm sure you are very used to these responses.
February 29, 20241 yr Wonder how many young girls have to be raped and murdered by illegal aliens before retarded sheetlibs admit there's a problem. Actually I don't wonder. They literally don't care.
February 29, 20241 yr 49 minutes ago, Kz! said: Wonder how many young girls have to be raped and murdered by illegal aliens before retarded sheetlibs admit there's a problem. Actually I don't wonder. They literally don't care. You need fresh talking points. Dems already admitted there was a problem. That's why they worked out a bipartisan solution. Republicans are the one's that shot it down.
February 29, 20241 yr 39 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: You need fresh talking points. Dems already admitted there was a problem. That's why they worked out a bipartisan solution. Republicans are the one's that shot it down. Yep, just 80 billion to foreign countries and a bunch of amnesty to current illegals to fix a problem Biden intentionally created. Seems legit. They really are this stupid, folks.
February 29, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, Kz! said: Yep, just 80 billion to foreign countries and a bunch of amnesty to current illegals to fix a problem Biden intentionally created. Seems legit. They really are this stupid, folks. Quote Sen. Lindsey Graham warned his GOP colleagues, "To those who think that if President Trump wins that we can get a better deal — you won’t,”
February 29, 20241 yr 7 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: Wow, you're telling me Lindsey Graham supports a deal that would fund overseas wars to the tune of 80 billion dollars? And you actually think that's a gotcha. I gotta stop interacting with this Fing idiot. Meanwhile the Biden admin has already admitted they could and might fix the problem: On 2/19/2024 at 1:09 PM, Kz! said: Wait, so Biden never needed Republicans to pass the "fix everything at the border" bill like all the sheetlibs in here were saying a few weeks ago? And I was right the whole time again? So you're telling me Biden just wanted to use the border crisis as a way to extract another 80 billion out of taxpayers to fund forever wars? Just stunned. Of course, fixing the problem is not something democrats are interested in, but they might have to just so they don't get bludgeoned over something that's universally unpopular among the electorate.
February 29, 20241 yr Van is going to pull out his eyepatch McCain Trump card with the next post. Fing midwit.
February 29, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, Kz! said: Wow, you're telling me Lindsey Graham supports a deal that would fund overseas wars to the tune of 80 billion dollars? And you actually think that's a gotcha. I gotta stop interacting with this Fing idiot. We both know it's the best border bill we'll ever get, but if the problem's fixed, you guys wouldn't be able to constantly ree about it and we both know how much you losers love to reee. Quote Of course, fixing the problem is not something democrats are interested in, but they might have to just so they don't get bludgeoned over something that's universally unpopular among the electorate. Yeah, an EO...that will inevitably get shot down by the court. Like Trump's were and Biden's Mexican asylum EO was. Much better than an actual legislative fix that would stay in place and address the broken system.
February 29, 20241 yr 7 minutes ago, Kz! said: Van is going to pull out his eyepatch McCain Trump card with the next post. Fing midwit. "Please stop using Republicans' words against them!"
February 29, 20241 yr Just now, VanHammersly said: We both know it's the best border bill we'll ever get, but if the problem's fixed, you guys wouldn't be able to constantly ree about it and we both know how much you losers love to reee. Yeah, an EO...that will inevitably get shot down by the court. Like Trump's were and Biden's Mexican asylum EO was. Much better than an actual legislative fix that would stay in place and address the broken system. Have you seen the data on border crossings since Biden took office? If you can find the data (you can't) you should post it here (you won't). Biden removed successful Trump EOs when he took office and illegal crossing subsequently exploded. This was done intentionally - kinda like Biden suing Texas and Arizona to have border fencing removed.
February 29, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, VanHammersly said: "Please stop using Republicans' words against them!" Yes, there are no shortage of Rinos in DC whose number one priority is to fund forever wars. That's no secret, and it doesn't make the retahd bill for retahds less retarded.
February 29, 20241 yr Just now, Kz! said: Yes, there are no shortage of Rinos in DC whose number one priority is to fund forever wars. That's no secret, and it doesn't make the retahd bill for retahds less retarded. RINO is my favorite nonsense term you guys use. It literally means nothing and it's applied with absolutely no consistency. Own it, dude. Trump shot down the best chance we had at a border fix. Even your party agrees.
February 29, 20241 yr 5 minutes ago, Kz! said: Have you seen the data on border crossings since Biden took office? If you can find the data (you can't) you should post it here (you won't). Biden removed successful Trump EOs when he took office and illegal crossing subsequently exploded. This was done intentionally - kinda like Biden suing Texas and Arizona to have border fencing removed. "Find this thing for me!" Every argument with you is the same. Now you'll hammer this one point in order to try and derail the conversation. It's both hilarious and completely ineffective. I love it.
February 29, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, VanHammersly said: RINO is my favorite nonsense term you guys use. It literally means nothing and it's applied with absolutely no consistency. Own it, dude. Trump shot down the best chance we had at a border fix. Even your party agrees. 7 minutes ago, Kz! said: Have you seen the data on border crossings since Biden took office? If you can find the data (you can't) you should post it here (you won't). Biden removed successful Trump EOs when he took office and illegal crossing subsequently exploded. This was done intentionally - kinda like Biden suing Texas and Arizona to have border fencing removed. My can't miss ratio is unbelievable.
February 29, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, Kz! said: My can't miss ratio is unbelievable. 2 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: "Find this thing for me!" Every argument with you is the same. Now you'll hammer this one point in order to try and derail the conversation. It's both hilarious and completely ineffective. I love it.
February 29, 20241 yr Just now, VanHammersly said: "Find this thing for me!" Every argument with you is the same. Now you'll hammer this one point in order to try and derail the conversation. It's both hilarious and completely ineffective. I love it. Yes, I'm sure basic statistics about the very topic "derail the conversation" for you. You'd much rather argue that Lindsey Graham is the voice of the Republican party like a midwit. Honestly, there should at least be some shame associated with arguing that a bill that gives $80 billion to foreign countries and a fourth of that to the problem as the "best deal ever." I mean, it's just so abjectly stupid on the surface to pick that talking point to run with. But, I get that you're a male liberal so shame is not really something you have the intelligence to feel. IDK, still weird though.
February 29, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, Kz! said: Yes, I'm sure basic statistics about the very topic "derail the conversation" for you. You'd much rather argue that Lindsey Graham is the voice of the Republican party like a midwit. "Republicans aren't really Republicans!" 1 minute ago, Kz! said: Honestly, there should at least be some shame associated with arguing that a bill that gives $80 billion to foreign countries and a fourth of that to the problem as the "best deal ever." I mean, it's just so abjectly stupid on the surface to pick that talking point to run with. But, I get that you're a male liberal so shame is not really something you have the intelligence to feel. IDK, still weird though. And yet, it's by far the strongest border bill we'll ever get. And it also included aid to help stop a fascist dictator from murdering women and children, which, for some insane reason, is a complete non-starter for the right...I wonder why.
February 29, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: "Republicans aren't really Republicans!" And yet, it's by far the strongest border bill we'll ever get. And it also included aid to help stop a fascist dictator from murdering women and children, which, for some insane reason, is a complete non-starter for the right...I wonder why. Why is it the strongest bill we'll ever get? Try to think critically.
February 29, 20241 yr Just now, Kz! said: Why is it the strongest bill we'll ever get? Because politics requires leverage and compromise. Dems were desperate to help our ally not get steamrolled by a fascist dictator so they dropped the whole citizenship for dreamers stuff and let the Republicans get literally everything they had been asking for. In a different circumstance (especially if there were a Republican president), the Dems would have absolutely no reason to compromise with Republicans. Pretending like politics happen in a vacuum and circumstances don't change based on power structures is fantasyland kids stuff, which is why it's not surprising that the right embraces that line of thinking every time.
Create an account or sign in to comment