11 minutes ago, jsdarkstar said:

I hope they call him Mr. Trump. That will tee him off even more. 

Nah, call him Donald.

Looks Like Cancun Cruz and Ho Mo Lyndsey Graham are making excuses for the Criminal Defendant on all the Cult Chanels. 

John Dean, who served as White House counsel to President Richard Nixon, on Monday summed up the latest indictment of former President Donald Trump by saying: "It’s much bigger than Watergate.”

4 hours ago, jsdarkstar said:

She can't try all 19 at the same time. It would turn into a total and complete circus. 

The better strategy is to have 3 trials of 6 -7 Defendant. Easier, more managable. 

First Trial. Trump, Rudi, Meadows, Eastman, Clark, and Powell.

2nd Trial: Cheeseboro, Clark, Ellis, Cheely, Roman, Shafer,

3rd Trial: Stil, Lee, Flyod, Kuti, Latham, Hall, Hampton and Smith.

No.  You get the people with lesser charges to agree to testify against Trump, Giuliani, Meadows, and Eastman.

2 hours ago, vikas83 said:

Les with a funny

 

Wonder if he slipped up and edited it before posting

2 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:

Wonder if he slipped up and edited it before posting

holy crap, les with a funny bomb ! 

4 hours ago, Boogyman said:

That's what I've been saying. Insult his intelligence non stop and keep saying he won't debate because he can't keep up. When he tries to fire back, be dismissive of him and treat him like an irrelevant afterthought to his face. Everyone running should do it. 

Given his love of nicknames, Donald Dumb - I mean that’s a layup right there

Just now, kiwieagle said:

Given his love of nicknames, Donald Dumb - I mean that’s a layup right there

I'm not sure the childish stuff would work well with him, just belittle him and be dismissive in regard to him as much as possible. 

Sick how they still have their lips puckered right up to that orang taint.  So the American public who booted Trump's ass out already, should make the decisions on his criminality, not the courts? So if I go murder someone, all I have to do is run for president and say, sorry, election interference, needs to be up to the American people!

Sen. Lindsey Graham’s Defense Of Donald Trump Goes Spectacularly Awry

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) sprung to the defense of Donald Trump ahead of the former president’s Georgia racketeering indictment and was mocked for comments that critics thought defined irony.

During Monday’s broadcast of Jesse Watters’ Fox News show, Graham said Trump’s mounting legal woes were "unfair.” He claimed prosecutors were weaponizing the law and setting "a bad precedent,” and insisted the former president’s fate should be left to voters.

"The American people can decide whether they want him to be president or not,” said Graham, a fierce critic of Trump before his 2016 election win who became one of his most loyal allies. "This should be decided at the ballot box, not a bunch of liberal jurisdictions trying to put the man in jail.”

11 minutes ago, Tweek said:

Sick how they still have their lips puckered right up to that orang taint.  So the American public who booted Trump's ass out already, should make the decisions on his criminality, not the courts? So if I go murder someone, all I have to do is run for president and say, sorry, election interference, needs to be up to the American people!

Sen. Lindsey Graham’s Defense Of Donald Trump Goes Spectacularly Awry

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) sprung to the defense of Donald Trump ahead of the former president’s Georgia racketeering indictment and was mocked for comments that critics thought defined irony.

During Monday’s broadcast of Jesse Watters’ Fox News show, Graham said Trump’s mounting legal woes were "unfair.” He claimed prosecutors were weaponizing the law and setting "a bad precedent,” and insisted the former president’s fate should be left to voters.

"The American people can decide whether they want him to be president or not,” said Graham, a fierce critic of Trump before his 2016 election win who became one of his most loyal allies. "This should be decided at the ballot box, not a bunch of liberal jurisdictions trying to put the man in jail.”

1. The american people can decide!
2. Unless they don't vote the way we want them to.
3. Then we will try to throw out their votes.
4. Then if you try to prosecute us, we will reiterate that the American people should decide!
5. See #2. Then repeat.

6 hours ago, vikas83 said:

Any sane Republican wins easily in 2024, and somehow the cult of imbeciles is going with the one moron that is almost guaranteed to lose. It's like Republicans saw Democrats blowing elections for decades and got jealous. Decided to take it up a notch.

I think they stopped caring about elections and started caring more about grift. 
 

If there was a law that politicians couldn’t get any salary other than their government one and were prevented from accepting any gifts at all you’d see it 

3 minutes ago, Bill said:

If there was a law that politicians couldn’t get any salary other than their government one and were prevented from accepting any gifts at all you’d see it 

It would never happen, but if it did I think people would be amazed at how quickly the quality of life in our society would improve. 

50 minutes ago, Gannan said:

1. The american people can decide!
2. Unless they don't vote the way we want them to.
3. Then we will try to throw out their votes.
4. Then if you try to prosecute us, we will reiterate that the American people should decide!
5. See #2. Then repeat.

Funny how Mitch McConnell used the same logic when it came to nominating Supreme Court justices during an election year.  The American people should decide...but when the president was a Republican, nope that rule doesn't apply now

1 hour ago, Bill said:

I think they stopped caring about elections and started caring more about grift. 
 

If there was a law that politicians couldn’t get any salary other than their government one and were prevented from accepting any gifts at all you’d see it 

I dunno. Then you would also have to say their spouses, kids, or anyone else close to then couldn't make money either.

56 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

I dunno. Then you would also have to say their spouses, kids, or anyone else close to then couldn't make money either.

Have their family audited every time they turn around. 

In the 1980's DA Rudi Giuliani became famous pioneering the RICO against Organized Crime. Now he is being charged under RICO Act.

Now Rudi will say RICO is unconstitutional. 

https://www.businessinsider.com/rudy-giuliani-indicted-georgia-trump-rico-2023-8

• Rudy Giuliani made his career using RICO to go after the mob when he was a US Attorney.
• Now, he's been indicted on RICO charges himself by the Fulton County DA's office.
• Giuliani was charged in connection to his efforts to help Trump overturn Georgia's 2020 election results.

 

 

This is par for the course. I, for one, am happy the ignorant poltroon can't shut his stupid pie hole.

By all means, Mr. Never Will Serve Any Office Ever Again, please go ahead and incriminate yourself a little more for us.

52 minutes ago, Toastrel said:

 

This is par for the course. I, for one, am happy the ignorant poltroon can't shut his stupid pie hole.

By all means, Mr. Never Will Serve Any Office Ever Again, please go ahead and incriminate yourself a little more for us.

I know he wants to influence the potential jury pool but is anyone even going to cover it?  You have to think even Fox, Newsmax, etc are too scared of a lawsuit to give him any airtime on this. All he’s going to do is likely incriminate himself even more. 

Just his modus operandi. Take a sheet situation and try to make it sheetier. 

2 hours ago, VanHammersly said:

I know he wants to influence the potential jury pool but is anyone even going to cover it?  You have to think even Fox, Newsmax, etc are too scared of a lawsuit to give him any airtime on this. All he’s going to do is likely incriminate himself even more. 

He's the GOP frontrunner making a speech. They will cover it (Fox, OAN, Newsmax) and then just add a qualifier after that there is no evidence of fraud in the 2020 election. They won't be found liable for airing his speech, especially if they add the qualifier.

30 minutes ago, vikas83 said:

He's the GOP frontrunner making a speech. They will cover it (Fox, OAN, Newsmax) and then just add a qualifier after that there is no evidence of fraud in the 2020 election. They won't be found liable for airing his speech, especially if they add the qualifier.

Fox could have saved themselves a bundle with this advice.

MAGA is a terrorist group, time to take the kids gloves off and treat them as such.

Trump supporters post names and addresses of Georgia grand jurors online

•  

Trump supporters post names and addresses of Georgia grand jurors online

ATLANTA — The purported names and addresses of members of the grand jury that indicted Donald Trump and 18 of his co-defendants on state racketeering charges this week have been posted on a fringe website that often features violent rhetoric, NBC News has learned.

NBC News is choosing not to name the website featuring the addresses to avoid further spreading the information.

 

The Fulton County District Attorney’s Office declined to comment. Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis faced racist threats ahead of the return of the indictment and additional security measures were put in place, with some employees being allowed to work from home.

The grand juror's purported addresses were spotted by Advance Democracy, Inc., a non-partisan research group founded by Daniel J. Jones, a former FBI investigator and staffer for the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.

"It’s becoming all too commonplace to see everyday citizens performing necessary functions for our democracy being targeted with violent threats by Trump-supporting extremists," Jones said. "The lack of political leadership on the right to denounce these threats — which serve to inspire real-world political violence— is shameful.”

Advance Democracy also noted that users were posting on other social media sites the names and images of people believed to have been grand jurors. The posts asserted that the jurors had posted on social media in support of Sens. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., former President Barack Obama and the Black Lives Matter movement.

"These jurors have signed their death warrant by falsely indicting President Trump," read one post on a pro-Trump forum in response to a post including the names of jurors, which was viewed by NBC News.

 

On 8/15/2023 at 11:45 PM, vikas83 said:

I'll keep coming back to this -- Donald Trump isn't the worst actor in this story. There's a reason we don't prosecute the criminally insane and mentally incompetent -- they are incapable of understanding the consequences of their actions. Donald Trump is clearly mentally incompetent and suffering from dementia. It's like trying to prosecute Grandpa Simpson at this point. 

The true scum are the GOP officials who keep humoring this toddler. People like McCarthy, Cruz, McDaniel, Hawley, etc. They are smart enough to know better, but they refuse to throw this idiot overboard. They will be the ones judged most harshly by history. It's compounded because they allow other mentally challenged idiots (Giuliani, Powell, etc.) to influence the idiot in chief. 

I think Trump knows exactly what he's doing. He's mentally incompetent but that's always been so; he doesn't have dementia he's just an entitled a-hole who's never been told no.