April 11, 20241 yr 7 minutes ago, Dave Moss said: Why are we hating on sloths? They’re cool af you just love being a debbie downer, dont you ? ok, is this better ?
April 11, 20241 yr 10 hours ago, lynched1 said: Interesting because she signed the statement half way through his presidency. This could get very entertaining. Totally a fake document. I wouldn't be surprised if the criminal defendant signed her name. LOL.
April 11, 20241 yr 1) the lawyer involved in this case has already been found guilty so yes, Trump is guilty lol Trump’s lawyers are expected to attempt to undermine Cohen’s testimony by noting that he pleaded guilty to a variety of federal crimes in 2018—including for his role in the hush-money payment—and that he and Trump had a falling out many years ago. 2) This letter is old news. CLAIM: A newly released document shows porn actor Stormy Daniels admitting she never had an affair with former President Donald Trump. AP’S ASSESSMENT: Missing context. The signed statement with the denial was publicly released on Jan. 30, 2018. Not long after, Daniels recanted the statement and said that an affair had occurred. She said her denials were due to a non-disclosure agreement and that she signed the statement because parties involved "made it sound like I had no choice.”
April 11, 20241 yr 57 minutes ago, Toastrel said: A bag of hammers outperforms you mentally in every possible way. You really are the complete moron. I'm putting the bar at a single wet moldy sock
April 11, 20241 yr Bad News for Trump. If he withheld evidence he could be charged and face additional fines. https://www.yahoo.com/news/letitia-james-not-done-donald-200251346.html Letitia James is not done with Donald Trump. Now she wants to know if he withheld evidence in her fraud case. Letitia James won a $454 million judgment against Trump, his penalty for a decade of fraud. She and Trump are now fighting over her claims that he withheld evidence from her fraud probe. NY law lets James seek additional fines if evidence that she subpoenaed was lost or destroyed. New York Attorney General Letitia James is not content to rest on her $454 million civil fraud trial victory, even as Trump's debt to the state keeps snowballing, growing by a punishing $5 million in interest since February. No, James still has some unfinished Trump business on her calendar. She is asking hard questions about the $175 million bond that would safeguard at least some of what Trump owes New York while he appeals losing the trial. A hearing on the bond's financial soundness is set for Monday, April 22. And James is also intent on holding Trump's feet to the fire, along with the feet of his lawyers, over something her office has complained about for four years: the withholding of evidence. The integrity of the fraud trial may be at stake, she argued in a letter Tuesday night. The AG is looking at three internal Trump Organization email chains from 2016 that were never turned over to her office during her five years of pursuing Trump for tricking banks into thinking he's worth more than he is. James knows the emails exist. Manhattan prosecutors used them as evidence in sending former Trump CFO Allen Weisselberg to jail for perjury on Monday. But the emails — in which Weisselberg and his Trump Org underlings responded to Forbes magazine questions about the value of Trump's Manhattan triplex penthouse — were not among the 900,000 documents Trump Org turned over to James' fraud probe. "The Court is well within its authority to determine if Defendants and their counsel facilitated that perjury by withholding of incriminating documents," James argued in Tuesday night's letter. Solving that mystery is "certainly within the power of this Court to safeguard the integrity of its own proceedings," she argued. A forensic review When James first found out about the missing triplex emails in October, she immediately asked the trial judge to order a forensic review of "electronic data held by the Trump Organization for the very brief period [of] August to September of 2016," when the emails were written. "The failure to produce these later emails indicates a breakdown somewhere in the process of preserving, collecting, reviewing, and producing documents," her office complained in an October 18 letter to the judge, state Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron. The forensic review would be conducted by the court-imposed monitor — former federal judge Barbara Jones — whose staff at Bracewell LLP has been scrutinizing Trump's finances since November, 2022.
April 11, 20241 yr 39 minutes ago, Tweek said: 1) the lawyer involved in this case has already been found guilty so yes, Trump is guilty lol Trump’s lawyers are expected to attempt to undermine Cohen’s testimony by noting that he pleaded guilty to a variety of federal crimes in 2018—including for his role in the hush-money payment—and that he and Trump had a falling out many years ago. 2) This letter is old news. CLAIM: A newly released document shows porn actor Stormy Daniels admitting she never had an affair with former President Donald Trump. AP’S ASSESSMENT: Missing context. The signed statement with the denial was publicly released on Jan. 30, 2018. Not long after, Daniels recanted the statement and said that an affair had occurred. She said her denials were due to a non-disclosure agreement and that she signed the statement because parties involved "made it sound like I had no choice.” Cohen is ready to answer those questions and has been for years. Clifford is ready to answer as well. Trump's defense is a weak at best.
April 11, 20241 yr 5 hours ago, JohnSnowsHair said: There is a paper trail. And she wouldn't sign a document as "Stormy Daniels" if it had to carry weight, it's not her real name numbnuts. Trump acknowledged the payment in an ethics filing back in 2018. It's a proven fact that Trump paid the porn star hush money. The trial is whether it's a campaign finance violation. Try to keep up sloth. When you're as stupid as you are, might be better to sit down and shut up. Trump's argument is he paid her $130,000 but didn't bang her. That is somehow worse and makes him look even dumber. So of course morons are eating it up.
April 11, 20241 yr His whole existence is getting dumber and more desperate by the day. Of course I don't see him dropping out, but holding out hope that somehow he gets kicked to the curb. I can only imagine what he'll do if he manages to stay in and he loses.........again. Certainly, it won't be pretty.
April 11, 20241 yr 3 minutes ago, vikas83 said: Trump's argument is he paid her $130,000 but didn't bang her. That is somehow worse and makes him look even dumber. So of course morons are eating it up. I'm not even sure how that is a defense. He still paid her to hush up about whatever relationship they had because it would threaten his campaign. Which is doubly stupid because now idiots will vote for him "because he bangs porn stars"
April 11, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: I'm not even sure how that is a defense. He still paid her to hush up about whatever relationship they had because it would threaten his campaign. Which is doubly stupid because now idiots will vote for him "because he bangs porn stars" For such a great businessman, he paid way above market to bang a porn star. Or so I've been told...
April 11, 20241 yr 9 minutes ago, DiPros said: His whole existence is getting dumber and more desperate by the day. Of course I don't see him dropping out, but holding out hope that somehow he gets kicked to the curb. I can only imagine what he'll do if he manages to stay in and he loses.........again. Certainly, it won't be pretty. Don't know how at this point but I'd love it if they can get him ineligible before the election. Though not sure how that would be logistically for the ballots
April 11, 20241 yr 56 minutes ago, mr_hunt said: Right, right, it's well documented how fond they were of kings and authoritarians which is why they codified that level of presidential power in the constitution itself. That whole checks and balances thing was just a bunch of typos.
April 11, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, vikas83 said: For such a great businessman, he paid way above market to bang a porn star. Or so I've been told... And for that price he could have done far better than Stormy. She probably has banked quite a bit on the notoriety from all this. I had no idea who she was before Trump.
April 11, 20241 yr 14 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: And for that price he could have done far better than Stormy. I had no idea who she was before Trump.
April 11, 20241 yr 5 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said: I mean, there are much better looking pr0n stars. Riley Reid, Mia Malkova, Alexis Texas.. not that I've heard of them either
April 11, 20241 yr Vietnam sentences real estate tycoon Truong My Lan to death in its largest-ever fraud case https://finance.yahoo.com/news/vietnam-sentences-real-estate-tycoon-090021820.html This is not an option in the USA, correct?
Create an account or sign in to comment