September 27, 20242 yr Oh my. Has anyone asked Hillary? There is currently a major manhunt underway by US Marshals for Nathan Wade, the former Fulton County investigator and DA Fani Willis’s lover.
September 27, 20242 yr 1 hour ago, DEagle7 said: Drunky Brewster doesn't even know what thread he's posting in The dudes a drunken troll and should be mostly ignored. Like trump, he thrives on the attention, good or bad.
September 27, 20242 yr 12 hours ago, Tnt4philly said: The dudes a drunken troll and should be mostly ignored. Like trump, he thrives on the attention, good or bad. Sure doesn't fit within your warped narrative
September 27, 20242 yr 27 minutes ago, Procus said: Sure doesn't fit within your warped narrative One, Wade no longer investigating Trump. He resigned from the Georgia Election Interference case because Republicans made such a big deal about his romance with Fani Willis. Two, you must have missed the update. House Republicans, who won't miss a chance to kick a man when he's down, resorted to using the US Marshals to serve a subpoena after Wade's attorney refused to accept it. They are grandstanding: don't pay attention to Trump's election misdeeds in Georgia, let's explore the investigator's romance with the prosecutor instead; and everyone knows it.
September 27, 20242 yr On 9/23/2024 at 3:22 PM, Toastrel said: Trump will keep it, thinking when he wins, he will make a lot of money. Yeah he won't let it go, he wants to pretend to be in the Space karen club, having his own social media platform to rule and lord over like a status symbol. You know like the NFL team he never got.
September 27, 20242 yr On 9/25/2024 at 12:47 PM, mr_hunt said: nsfw language..... Anti-psychopath inc. 🤣🤣🤣
September 27, 20242 yr Author 1 hour ago, toolg said: One, Wade no longer investigating Trump. He resigned from the Georgia Election Interference case because Republicans made such a big deal about his romance with Fani Willis. Two, you must have missed the update. House Republicans, who won't miss a chance to kick a man when he's down, resorted to using the US Marshals to serve a subpoena after Wade's attorney refused to accept it. They are grandstanding: don't pay attention to Trump's election misdeeds in Georgia, let's explore the investigator's romance with the prosecutor instead; and everyone knows it. cheeto is literally on tape asking the georgia official to "find the votes" but yeah....let's investigate the investigator!
September 27, 20242 yr On 9/25/2024 at 12:47 PM, mr_hunt said: nsfw language..... Disgusting filth. No wonder so many here will vote for him. They are okay with this, knot zees, and defrauding cancer patients, even kids.
October 3, 20242 yr 5 hours ago, Diehardfan said: Democrats didn't push alternate electors. There were a handful of faithless electors who didn't vote for the chosen candidate - including three who defected from Clinton. Alternate electors are unequivocally illegal. Faithless electors are legal in many states. Alternate electors are literally different people sent to try and confuse and nullify the proper electors sent by the states. Faithless electors are individuals sent by states that vote against the candidate prescribed to them.
October 3, 20242 yr 15 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: Democrats didn't push alternate electors. There were a handful of faithless electors who didn't vote for the chosen candidate - including three who defected from Clinton. Alternate electors are unequivocally illegal. Faithless electors are legal in many states. Alternate electors are literally different people sent to try and confuse and nullify the proper electors sent by the states. Faithless electors are individuals sent by states that vote against the candidate prescribed to them. Careful. While different on its face, that group of faithless electors met with the Clinton campaign, reached out to electors in other states, and publicly discussed lawsuits in 29 states to challenge laws binding electors to the outcome of the state vote. Some would see that as a conspiracy to undermine the results of a lawful election.
October 3, 20242 yr 21 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: Democrats didn't push alternate electors. There were a handful of faithless electors who didn't vote for the chosen candidate - including three who defected from Clinton. Alternate electors are unequivocally illegal. Faithless electors are legal in many states. Alternate electors are literally different people sent to try and confuse and nullify the proper electors sent by the states. Faithless electors are individuals sent by states that vote against the candidate prescribed to them. He isn't good with facts.
October 3, 20242 yr 8 minutes ago, BBE said: Careful. While different on its face, that group of faithless electors met with the Clinton campaign, reached out to electors in other states, and publicly discussed lawsuits in 29 states to challenge laws binding electors to the outcome of the state vote. Some would see that as a conspiracy to undermine the results of a lawful election. There's no federal law against lobbying electors. And if a legitimate elector "votes their conscience" it could be successfully argued that it's consistent with an original safeguard of the Constitution and our system based on the federalist papers. Sending alternate electors is 100% criminal. Regarding meeting the electors, Clinton conceded the election and never endorsed or coordinated with any of them. Had she actually done so the movement would have almost certainly gained more traction than it ultimately did. It failed in large part due to her lack of support.
October 3, 20242 yr Funny that in the "partisan witch hunt" all of the cooperating witnesses are Republicans.
October 3, 20242 yr 30 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: There's no federal law against lobbying electors. And if a legitimate elector "votes their conscience" it could be successfully argued that it's consistent with an original safeguard of the Constitution and our system based on the federalist papers. Sending alternate electors is 100% criminal. Regarding meeting the electors, Clinton conceded the election and never endorsed or coordinated with any of them. Had she actually done so the movement would have almost certainly gained more traction than it ultimately did. It failed in large part due to her lack of support. Never mind the Constitution stating that the President is selected by the States.
October 3, 20242 yr 1 hour ago, BBE said: Careful. While different on its face, that group of faithless electors met with the Clinton campaign, reached out to electors in other states, and publicly discussed lawsuits in 29 states to challenge laws binding electors to the outcome of the state vote. Some would see that as a conspiracy to undermine the results of a lawful election. Wrong. No false slates of electors were submitted in those states. There was no conspiracy to coordinate their submission, and no documentation whatsoever that campaign officials instructed them to do so. Get your facts straight if you're gonna try to act like the two situations are in any way comparable. Trump F'ed up and committed crimes when he tried to subvert democracy after losing the 2020 election. Full stop. No white washing from you or any other of your fellow trumpbots will ever change that. There's no way to "both sides" this one no matter how hard you try. You supported (and still do) the worst president in US history and that will be your legacy to own forever just as much as it is his.
Create an account or sign in to comment