46 minutes ago, mayanh8 said:

If I were Wallace I wouldn't want Fox and their stable of lunatics trading on my good name as a legitimate political commentator. No self respecting human would tolerate it.

Well, also Fox has to compete with OAN and Newsmax now.  The only way they can really do that is to cater to the crazier folks

30 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

Well, also Fox has to compete with OAN and Newsmax now.  The only way they can really do that is to cater to the crazier folks

Much like CNN and MSNBC

5 hours ago, Boogyman said:

I have heard Hannity on the radio a few times to listen to him whine. 

I can't listen to him talk. Voice is too high pitched and he repeats himself too much.

8 minutes ago, lynched1 said:

I can't listen to him talk. Voice is too high pitched and he repeats himself too much.

Yup. That's whining. He sounds like a ****. But really, anyone who calls themselves a member of the "news" and tells you what they think or what you should think, should be turned off and find a new channel.

1 hour ago, Boogyman said:

Your mom just left my house. I made her use the back window though.

Crazy. I just came through your mom’s back door. 

3 minutes ago, 20dawk4life said:

Crazy. I just came through your mom’s back door. 

I am very sorry for that. But we all do get desperate. 

For future reference, @20dawk4life's ideal woman is a 75 year old, severely underweight woman who smokes 2 packs a day and probably has some sort of respiratory illness. I guess someone has to be willing to dive to the bottom of the barrel!

19 minutes ago, lynched1 said:

Much like CNN and MSNBC

Who is their competition?

23 hours ago, vikas83 said:

His presence at Fox was no longer tenable, given his dedication to honest reporting. Plus, he seems to want to jump on the streaming freight train. 

dEdIcAtIoN tO hOnEsT rEpOrTiNg

 

8 minutes ago, Kz! said:

dEdIcAtIoN tO hOnEsT rEpOrTiNg

 

this is, not surprisingly, a dishonest "quote".

The actual question:

WALLACE: But are you willing, tonight, to condemn white supremacists and militia groups and to say that they need to stand down and not add to the violence in a number of these cities as we saw in Kenosha and as we’ve seen in Portland? Are you prepared to specifically do that?

The implication by Wallace being there is already violence happening unrelated to these white supremacist groups, all he asked Trump to do was condemn those who would add to that violence.

It was a goddamn gimme. All he had to do was condemn white supremacists. A slam dunk, set up by Wallace. He couldn't do it.

They will replace him with someone whos far more radical. 

2 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

this is, not surprisingly, a dishonest "quote".

The actual question:

WALLACE: But are you willing, tonight, to condemn white supremacists and militia groups and to say that they need to stand down and not add to the violence in a number of these cities as we saw in Kenosha and as we’ve seen in Portland? Are you prepared to specifically do that?

The implication by Wallace being there is already violence happening unrelated to these white supremacist groups, all he asked Trump to do was condemn those who would add to that violence.

It was a goddamn gimme. All he had to do was condemn white supremacists. A slam dunk, set up by Wallace. He couldn't do it.

Doing that would cost him Kz's vote though.

7 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

Doing that would cost him Kz's vote though.

Totally. Here's 38 times he's done just that.

But, yeah, just one more disavowal and I may have voted for Joey Alzheimer's.   

10 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

this is, not surprisingly, a dishonest "quote".

The actual question:

WALLACE: But are you willing, tonight, to condemn white supremacists and militia groups and to say that they need to stand down and not add to the violence in a number of these cities as we saw in Kenosha and as we’ve seen in Portland? Are you prepared to specifically do that?

The implication by Wallace being there is already violence happening unrelated to these white supremacist groups, all he asked Trump to do was condemn those who would add to that violence.

It was a goddamn gimme. All he had to do was condemn white supremacists. A slam dunk, set up by Wallace. He couldn't do it.

 

5 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Totally. Here's 38 times he's done just that.

But, yeah, just one more disavowal and I may have voted for Joey Alzheimer's.   

You probably saw that video after you voted, and it dissapointed you I'm sure. I bet you would love to take that vote you wasted for Dementia Donny back now!

8 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

You probably saw that video after you voted, and it dissapointed you I'm sure. I bet you would love to take that vote you wasted for Dementia Donny back now!

24 minutes ago, Kz! said:

 

I'm dissapointed you can't take a little critism. 

12 minutes ago, Kz! said:

I'm dissapointed the way my life has gone.

We know man. 

9 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

"real news network" 

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/dec/6/jussie-smollett-don-lemon-tipped-me-about-chicago-/

"Real news network" check:

  

do we really have to dig up all the sins of Fox News? In 2020 alone they photoshopped out Trump from a picture where he, Epstein, and Ghislaine Maxwell were at Mar-a-Lago, and photoshopped IN armed demonstrators in pictures of the Portland or Seattle protests IIRC.

17 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

do we really have to dig up all the sins of Fox News? In 2020 alone they photoshopped out Trump from a picture where he, Epstein, and Ghislaine Maxwell were at Mar-a-Lago, and photoshopped IN armed demonstrators in pictures of the Portland or Seattle protests IIRC.

totally normal response to a post about a senior producer at CNN being recently arrested for inducing minors for sex. I still can't figure out why people laugh at you when you say you're a moderate.  

Shocked he made it this long. Wallace is being crowded out by lunatics on a network determined to out-stupid the OANs and Newsmaxes of the world.

9 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Shocked he made it this long. Wallace is being crowded out by lunatics on a network determined to out-stupid the OANs and Newsmaxes of the world.

And yet how strangely silent you are about CNN

 

6 minutes ago, Procus said:

And yet how strangely silent you are about CNN

 

CNN sucks large sweaty balls too. Though to be fair, they're somewhat slightly more tethered to reality since they are able to acknowledge covid is real, vaccines help save lives, and Biden won the election fair and square. Anyone who spends any amount of time watching either network needs to get a life.

What's funny is that nobody is coming to the defense of anybody at CNN who engaged in unethical or downright evil behavior.

But you continue to harp on it here because it's all you got.

Contrast this with the unending excuse making for Trump, who has been accused of similar and sometimes worse behavior - including by his own admission walking into the dressing room during a Miss USA pageant and gawking at the women. (Worth noting that 5 Miss TEEN USA contestants also came forward saying he did the same, but that has never been corroborated). 

One you continually defend. The other you don't.

Because you only care about the partisan angle. If it makes "liberals" look bad you embrace it, if it makes conservatives look bad you deny it.