Jump to content

The Miscellaneous Liberal\PC BS\Commie Gibberish\Clown World\Lame Hunt Jokes\Corporate Virtue Signaling Thread

Featured Replies

8 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Helping an elderly lady while making her commie granddaughter look like complete scum and making a mockery of her politics? Yeah I’d say that fits the definition. 🤣🤣🤣

The story was already out.  She already looked like scum.  This did absolutely nothing except take money from the dumbest people on the planet and give it to probably a nice old woman, which is an absolute win for the world.  And a win for AOC.  It saves her some money and exactly zero people in her district care what idiot right wingers do in their desperate pursuit to own people :lol:.  I'm all for it.

  • Replies 14.6k
  • Views 483k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

You guys should own Biden next and give 50k to Hunter.

3 minutes ago, Kz! said:

yes and I was responding to the hypothetical you posed but don’t care about by saying it would be dumb.

Just Google "would" and "should" and stop being a moron.

8 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

The story was already out.  She already looked like scum.  This did absolutely nothing except take money from the dumbest people on the planet and give it to probably a nice old woman, which is an absolute win for the world.  And a win for AOC.  It saves her some money and exactly zero people in her district care what idiot right wingers do in their desperate pursuit to own people :lol:.  I'm all for it.

Oh me too. Conservatives got together and gave mostly small sums of money voluntarily to help an old lady. That’s a win in and of itself, but it’s even better that it shed light on just how pathetic and hypocritical aoc and socialist Dems are.

"No one should be rich and wealth should be redistributed! Oh no, I was talking about your wealth, not mine. I need my Tesla.” 

Win/win/win if you ask me.

10 minutes ago, Paul852 said:

You guys should own Biden next and give 50k to Hunter.

He’d blow it all on meth lmfao

2 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Oh me too. Conservatives got together and gave mostly small sums of money voluntarily to help an old lady. That’s a win in and of itself, but it’s even better that it shed light on just how pathetic and hypocritical aoc and socialist Dems are.

"No one should be rich and wealth should be redistributed! Oh no, I was talking about your wealth, not mine. I need my Tesla.” 

Win/win/win if you ask me.

He’d blow it all on meth lmfao

My favorite part is that you guys somehow think you're making an ideological point. Her grandma wasn't living in squalor because of Socialism, she was living in squalor because AOC's a sheet bag and didn't help her grandma out.  

No one's converting to Fascism based on this, I hate to tell you.  Every normal person already hated AOC and everyone in her district is a lunatic left-winger and probably likes her more in opposition to the right.

All you did was hand over 2 months worth of welfare checks to pay an old lady.  No one ever said it was hard to separate a Republican from his money in the name of owning the libs.  :roll:

6 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

My favorite part is that you guys somehow think you're making an ideological point. Her grandma wasn't living in squalor because of Socialism, she was living in squalor because AOC's a sheet bag and didn't help her grandma out.  

No one's converting to Fascism based on this, I hate to tell you.  Every normal person already hated AOC and everyone in her district is a lunatic left-winger and probably likes her more in opposition to the right.

All you did was hand over 2 months worth of welfare checks to pay an old lady.  No one ever said it was hard to separate a Republican from his money in the name of owning the libs.  :roll:

Yes, pointing out that socialists like AOC are not only scumbags but also complete and utter frauds was the entire point. The fact that you’re so triggered that you’re rage posting about it makes it that sweeter. 🤣🤣🤣

45 minutes ago, Kz! said:

 

He’d blow it all on meth lmfao

50k, I'm sure he can split it and buy some coke for the last president's loser kids too. Now that would be quite a party.

So,let me see if I understand this argument here. A wealthy person who just bought an $80k car took to Twitter to post her grandma's terrible living conditions and blame them on trump, while offer no help. Then, a group of people who don't like her decided to help her grandma by raising $50k, something she could have easily done, as a way to make her look bad. 

And people here are calling the ones that raised the money idiots?

1 hour ago, BFit said:

So,let me see if I understand this argument here. A wealthy person who just bought an $80k car took to Twitter to post her grandma's terrible living conditions and blame them on trump, while offer no help. Then, a group of people who don't like her decided to help her grandma by raising $50k, something she could have easily done, as a way to make her look bad. 

And people here are calling the ones that raised the money idiots?

Yep - welcome to CVON 

3 hours ago, Kz! said:

They already hit the goal. 

Awaiting aoc’s response now. 😂🤣

So socialism works? 

2 hours ago, BFit said:

So,let me see if I understand this argument here. A wealthy person who just bought an $80k car took to Twitter to post her grandma's terrible living conditions and blame them on trump, while offer no help. Then, a group of people who don't like her decided to help her grandma by raising $50k, something she could have easily done, as a way to make her look bad. 

And people here are calling the ones that raised the money idiots?

No, the idiots are the ones calling it a "troll job". 

Oh, and let's clarify here. I'm sure AOC isn't wealthy and she didn't "buy" an 80k car.

Democrats are scientifically proven to be selfish and stingy, while Republicans are scientifically proven to be charitable. No amount of smug deflection can overcome the science. 

20210527_205839.jpg

43 minutes ago, The_Omega said:

Democrats are scientifically proven to be selfish and stingy, while Republicans are scientifically proven to be charitable. No amount of smug deflection can overcome the science. 

* statistically

1 hour ago, Paul852 said:

No, the idiots are the ones calling it a "troll job". 

Oh, and let's clarify here. I'm sure AOC isn't wealthy and she didn't "buy" an 80k car.

Yea I mean, she doesn't make 174k a year.....

Just now, BFit said:

Yea I mean, she doesn't make 174k a year.....

Oh....is that wealthy?

1 minute ago, Paul852 said:

Oh....is that wealthy?

6 figures a year is wealthy, yes

1 minute ago, BFit said:

6 figures a year is wealthy, yes

No it's really not.

Btw, in case anyone didn't know it already, PA's AG Josh Shapiro, is a badass.

 

55 minutes ago, The_Omega said:

Democrats are scientifically proven to be selfish and stingy, while Republicans are scientifically proven to be charitable. No amount of smug deflection can overcome the science. 

I’ve always heard that Reps give more but I’d love to see a thorough breakdown of where that money is donated to. Giving a tithe isn’t necessarily charitable giving.  It could be since churches do a lot of charity work, or it could be going to Joel Olsteen’s Gulfstream fund.  I wonder how those numbers skew once you cut the fat. 

3 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

I’ve always heard that Reps give more but I’d love to see a thorough breakdown of where that money is donated to. Giving a tithe isn’t necessarily charitable giving.  It could be since churches do a lot of charity work, or it could be going to Joel Olsteen’s Gulfstream fund.  I wonder how those numbers skew once you cut the fat. 

Yeah, I was going to go there but really didn't care enough to disprove his "science".

4 minutes ago, BFit said:

6 figures a year is wealthy, yes

It’s certainly nowhere near enough to take care of everyone in your family. Though it’s probably irrelevant in AOC’s case since I’m guessing she has a book deal or some other source of media money coming in. 

Just now, Paul852 said:

No it's really not.

It is in my book. At least wealthy enough to help out your Grandma. 

Just now, BFit said:

It is in my book. At least wealthy enough to help out your Grandma. 

I think you have broad definition of wealthy. Good for you. :lol:

53 minutes ago, BFit said:

6 figures a year is wealthy, yes

I mean, it's not poor, but it's not what I'd consider wealthy either.  Doing well no doubt, but it's not like it's $300k - $400k a year that can allow you to truly build some generational wealth.

Oh and AOC sucks dongs for not doing more to help her grandma though. Pretty tone deaf and borderline exploitative of her to post pictures of her home on social media to score political points. That being said, anyone donating money thinking they are "trolling" AOC clearly doesn't understand the meaning of words.

Create an account or sign in to comment