Jump to content

The Miscellaneous Liberal\PC BS\Commie Gibberish\Clown World\Lame Hunt Jokes\Corporate Virtue Signaling Thread

Featured Replies

43 minutes ago, 20dawk4life said:

I live in philly and drink sweet tea. My brother in law who lives in the north side of Poland drinks sweet tea. Maybe don't be a racist? 

i first drank sweet tea when i was a kid & my parents had a cabin out past richboro. (before the 45 housing developments) and the farmer there used to make it sun tea style. there'd be like 15 jars on the sunny side of the porch. 

 

that and they had a soda vending machine with RC cola. 

  • Replies 14.6k
  • Views 483.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

Iced tea isn't southern, nor is sweet tea. The first published recipe for sweet tea was published in Virginia, but that is about the depth of it. It became a popular drink in the north and south around the time the civil war broke out.

 

18 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

It has nothing to do with race and everything to do with climate, dope.  Which I’ve already said more than once…

Stop being a racist dope and you won’t get called out for being a racist. 
"people closer to the equator drink more sweet tea”. We all see what you’re implying racist. 

Just now, 20dawk4life said:

Stop being a racist dope and you won’t get called out for being a racist. 
"people closer to the equator drink more sweet tea”. We all see what you’re implying racist. 

I grew up on WaWa iced tea, but I’ll drink the occasional sweet tea.  All Teas matter.

8 minutes ago, Toastrel said:

Iced tea isn't southern, nor is sweet tea. The first published recipe for sweet tea was published in Virginia, but that is about the depth of it. It became a popular drink in the north and south around the time the civil war broke out.

 

edit; interesting article on this. 

 

Why "As Southern as Sweet Tea" Isn't Very Southern at All (seriouseats.com)

🤔

1 minute ago, Dave Moss said:

I grew up on WaWa iced tea, but I’ll drink the occasional sweet tea.  All Teas matter.

😯

I loathe sweet tea.

Unsweetened iced tea for the win.

3 minutes ago, Toastrel said:

I loathe sweet tea.

Unsweetened iced tea with lemon for the win.

FYP :ph34r:

4 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

FYP :ph34r:

Lemon or mint is nice, but not necessary.

I don’t like tea of any kind. Never have. 
 

I’m an admitted teaist. I live a life of teaism.

 

No tea matters! 

38 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

I grew up on WaWa iced tea, but I’ll drink the occasional sweet tea.  All Teas matter.

Racist. 

35 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

😯

He’s such a racist. 

14 minutes ago, EagleJoe8 said:

I don’t like tea of any kind. Never have. 
 

I’m an admitted teaist. I live a life of teaism.

 

No tea matters! 

#1 characteristic for a flat earther is a hatred for tea.

 

you got explaining to do, pal. 

Now let's do I still use the EMB's #1 Cliche next and how much sugar you put in it. 

17 minutes ago, EagleJoe8 said:

I don’t like tea of any kind. Never have. 
 

I’m an admitted teaist. I live a life of teaism.

 

No tea matters! 

I rescind all my likes from the boob thread. 

1 minute ago, DaEagles4Life said:

Now let's do I still use the EMB's #1 Cliche next and how much sugar you put in it. 

1 2/3 cp/gal

1 minute ago, 20dawk4life said:

I rescind all my likes from the boob thread. 

😒

6 minutes ago, NCTANK said:

1 2/3 cp/gal

😒

Just his I mean 

9 minutes ago, 20dawk4life said:

I rescind all my likes from the boob thread. 

I need to catch up on my reading....

2 hours ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

#1 characteristic for a flat earther is a hatred for tea.

 

you got explaining to do, pal. 

Tea always finds its level!

rgu72wd3ys971.png.0425b334b5748385af0a99701897be3a.png

 

First Biden, now "Uber-progressive NYC Democrats" elect a pro-cop moderate.

Despite claims to the contrary, the lunatic fringe is only in control of one of the two parties.

1 minute ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

rgu72wd3ys971.png.0425b334b5748385af0a99701897be3a.png

 

First Biden, now "Uber-progressive NYC Democrats" elect a pro-cop moderate.

Despite claims to the contrary, the lunatic fringe is only in control of one of the two parties.

Democrats really need to stop electing people that want to fund the police, it's making it much harder on Republicans to lie about their positions.

Also, it really sucks that ranked choice got so much bad publicity from the NYC mayor's race.  It's a solid technocratic change that opens things up to 3rd party candidates, so it would be a shame if people wrote it off based on one highly publicized primary that, as far as I can tell, was still securely settled.

24 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

rgu72wd3ys971.png.0425b334b5748385af0a99701897be3a.png

 

First Biden, now "Uber-progressive NYC Democrats" elect a pro-cop moderate.

Despite claims to the contrary, the lunatic fringe is only in control of one of the two parties.

Has more to do with de Blasio, dont kid yourself

How did De Blasio get elected in the first place?  The guy is absolutely a lunatic fringer

20 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

Democrats really need to stop electing people that want to fund the police, it's making it much harder on Republicans to lie about their positions.

Also, it really sucks that ranked choice got so much bad publicity from the NYC mayor's race.  It's a solid technocratic change that opens things up to 3rd party candidates, so it would be a shame if people wrote it off based on one highly publicized primary that, as far as I can tell, was still securely settled.

Lol you say this after De Blasio literally destroyed the pre eminent American city with his insanely liberal agenda

I love this reimagining of history though

6 minutes ago, Mike31mt said:

Lol you say this after De Blasio literally destroyed the pre eminent American city with his insanely liberal agenda

I love this reimagining of history though

Say what?  That New York Democrats nominated a guy that very publicly wants to fund the police?  What's being reimagined with that statement?

11 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

Say what?  That New York Democrats nominated a guy that very publicly wants to fund the police?  What's being reimagined with that statement?

Its a reaction to the absolute disaster that was De Blasio and his lunatic agenda

Youre saying "defund the police" is some invention of the right when in reality the left just realized how horrible it was and that its a losing strategy, so they were forced to come back to the center from the fringe

The fact that the attacks on defund the police were wildly successful for the Republicans doesnt mean the Dems never tried it.  They did

 

3 minutes ago, Mike31mt said:

Its a reaction to the absolute disaster that was De Blasio and his lunatic agenda

Youre saying "defund the police" is some invention of the right when in reality the left just realized how horrible it was and that its a losing strategy, so they were forced to come back to the center from the fringe

The fact that the attacks on defund the police were wildly successful for the Republicans doesnt mean the Dems never tried it.  They did

 

I'm not saying it was an invention of the right.  It was an invention of the far left that the right wing media seized on.  What I'm saying is that the notion that the entire Democratic Party, or even close to a majority of it, is pro-Defund the Police is an invention of the right, and when pro-Fund the Police Dems keep winning in high profile races it punches holes in the lies the right tells to their voting base.

The far left certainly tried to push Defund (and still is trying it by the way), but that doesn't, and never has, had any bearing on the larger Democratic Party.  Biden easily won the nomination, was never a Defund the Police guy and has boosted funding for police since coming into office (while every Republican voted against funding the police).  Proof is in the pudding.  I'd much rather support the party that actually pays to fund the police but has a vocal extreme flank that screams Defund then the party that pays lip service to cops but can't be bothered to vote for the funding they need because doing so would mean they committed the cardinal sin of working with the other side.

But I don't blame you for getting triggered by pro-Fund the Police Dems winning high profile elections.  It's given you guys a lot of mileage, so I'm sure you'd like to keep pretending that it's a mainstream Dem idea.

9 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

I'm not saying it was an invention of the right.  It was an invention of the far left that the right wing media seized on.  What I'm saying is that the notion that the entire Democratic Party, or even close to a majority of it, is pro-Defund the Police is an invention of the right, and when pro-Fund the Police Dems keep winning in high profile races it punches holes in the lies the right tells to their voting base.

The far left certainly tried to push Defund (and still is trying it by the way), but that doesn't, and never has, had any bearing on the larger Democratic Party.  Biden easily won the nomination, was never a Defund the Police guy and has boosted funding for police since coming into office (while every Republican voted against funding the police).  Proof is in the pudding.  I'd much rather support the party that actually pays to fund the police but has a vocal extreme flank that screams Defund then the party that pays lip service to cops but can't be bothered to vote for the funding they need because doing so would mean they committed the cardinal sin of working with the other side.

But I don't blame you for getting triggered by pro-Fund the Police Dems winning high profile elections.  It's given you guys a lot of mileage, so I'm sure you'd like to keep pretending that it's a mainstream Dem idea.

not naming any names, but here's somebody's real life reaction to this post. 

 

Computer Smash GIF - TheOtherGuys RageQuit Quit - Discover & Share GIFs

Create an account or sign in to comment