4 hours ago, paco said:

"Purchased”

my bad

20 hours ago, iladelphxx said:

Didn't Drake rap about this?  Isn't he a lesbian too?

23 hours ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

Why does the right wing media ignore the large number of right-wing politicians, preachers, and cops who are caught with child pornography and/or having relations with minors? Many of whom are vocal and heavily critical of the left as "groomers"?

There's over 500 ADAs in New York. Some, I assume, are bad people. This guy was caught engaging in criminal behavior, is no longer an ADA, and may well be investigated and prosecuted. 

This isn't the sort of thing typically picked up by national media. It's being picked up by right wing media solely because of its political value. And you're falling for it.

I started the Bipartisan Pedo Woodchipper thread. 

The right isn't elevating and forcing these degenerates on society and exposing them to our children. 

I don't care if they are a Prosecutor, a Priest, a member of Congress or whatever profession, political or religious affiliation or sexual orientation they are. Anyone who is caught sexually abusing or exploiting children should be executed publicly in the most painful and heinous way possible. 

1 hour ago, iladelphxx said:

I started the Bipartisan Pedo Woodchipper thread. 

The right isn't elevating and forcing these degenerates on society and exposing them to our children. 

I don't care if they are a Prosecutor, a Priest, a member of Congress or whatever profession, political or religious affiliation or sexual orientation they are. Anyone who is caught sexually abusing or exploiting children should be executed publicly in the most painful and heinous way possible. 

Let's unpack that a bit. 

You accuse the left of "elevating and forcing degenerates on society".

Social Conservatives by definition reflexively act against any changes that challenge social and cultural norms. This is a necessary source of social pressure to prevent overly aggressive change to threaten societal cohesion, but also can be a source of bigotry and undue vilification of anything different - often through labeling such things as degeneracy. 

Social Liberals by definition embrace newness and change, empathizing heavily with groups they deem as victims of the current social and cultural order. They often do so blind to the damage that changing norms too swiftly can represent a danger to the tribe by introducing unknown elements - and any unknown elements are going to carry risk. 

ALL of us within the normal range, be us socially liberal or conservative, wholeheartedly agree that the sexual exploitation of children is abhorrent and that a woodchipper is an appropriate mechanism to deal with that. 

So revisiting your statement: you say liberals are elevating degenerates. You say this on what basis? Do you have hard evidence that intersex or transgender persons are victimizing children at a higher rate than those who operate within social norms? Or are you going based on media focus on those individuals who fit both profiles - trans/drag/whatever and woodchipper fodder - that you believe these groups represent a larger threat than the general populations?

From a liberal point of view, might one not also argue that Republicans elevate religious leaders who engender trust with our children, and who also seem to engage in woodchipper deserving behavior in high profile ways? 

On a factual basis I've never seen any analysis that showed higher incidences of sexual exploitation of minors among groups "elevated" by the left.

So much of that perception is endemic to social conservatives (which in and of itself is not necessarily bad, these are normal pressures among every population of human beings since tribes were formed) and based not on factual evidence supporting the claims but a reflexive rejection of anything new, weird, or different. And from that there is layered unfounded labeling of those new and different people and ideas, and a desire to find instances of misbehavior and undesirable results and hold them up as representative.

And to be sure, this is one instance where "both sides" engage in intellectually dishonest argumentation laden with logical fallacies. 

lol. It’s not that complicated. Republicans are all pedos. And some Dems are too. The wood chipper doesn’t discriminate. 

The Author:

11 hours ago, lynched1 said:

you have green hair?

10 hours ago, Procus said:

thankfully bottom-donny tried to push such crap out of our stores. 

 

oh wait, he's just like the rest. 

 

A 1st grader drew this and then was subsequently punished with several consequences as being disruptive to other classmates.  There is also a question as to whether the principle called the drawing "boob" or not.  A case was taken up and is starting its way in California court system.  The first ruling was in the favor of the school but that has been appealed (of course).

You can read about it here https://reason.com/2024/08/09/california-school-punishes-first-grader-for-a-drawing-sparking-federal-lawsuit/

4 hours ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

you have green hair?

I realize you were abandoned some time ago but it's your mom

1 hour ago, lynched1 said:

I realize you were abandoned some time ago but it's your mom

2 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

  Sloth hits so much harder now that we know he lives next door to a nuclear power plant

 

 

1 hour ago, VanHammersly said:

  Sloth hits so much harder now that we know he lives next door to a nuclear power plant

A ream of paper hits you harder you web toed pedophile.