July 7, 20205 yr 3 minutes ago, Kz! said: I've actually never given my opinion on the decision. Frankly, I think it's a little overly punitive to throw charges on top of her as well, considering she's lost the dog, and her job, and has essentially had her life destroyed by an encounter that was pretty unnecessary. My stance has been they're both aholes the entire time, but only one has seen their life completely destroyed, while the other has been celebrated on the internet. I know I have a leftist on the ropes when hunt has to come in and play defense lmao And there is the problem apparently. Always seems to be that you take certain exceptions based on the circumstances without fail. She could have gotten this guy killed and your main concern is an interpretation to what was going to happen regarding the treats this guy had.
July 7, 20205 yr 2 minutes ago, Paul852 said: The law has spoken. I agree with them. No threats were made and she was charged. Those are my thoughts. End of discussion. Stop being so stubbornly wrong all the time. OK let's be more direct. "You are not going to like what I'm going to do" then attempts to coax the animal away. What do you think he meant by that.
July 7, 20205 yr 5 minutes ago, rambo said: Chick Fil A opening by me put an end to my McD days forever. Kids would rather have that. Mobile order, curbside. Just pull in and they bring it out. Customer service difference between the 2 places is unbelievable. McDonalds drive thru is like an hour with 4 cars in line. Chick Fil A with 400...10 minutes maybe. Chick Fil A customer service is awesome. However, I think the place is massively overrated.
July 7, 20205 yr Just now, Kz! said: OK let's be more direct. "You are not going to like what I'm going to do" then attempts to coax the animal away. What do you think he meant by that. That he was going to get the dog to come to him because it wasn't on a leash. Don't know why you'd think it meant he was going to harm the dog. That's quite the extreme opinion to take there. The only one who harmed the dog was Amy Cooper.
July 7, 20205 yr 2 minutes ago, Paul852 said: That he was going to get the dog to come to him because it wasn't on a leash. Don't know why you'd think it meant he was going to harm the dog. That's quite the extreme opinion to take there. The only one who harmed the dog was Amy Cooper. lmao. "You are not going to like what I'm going to do." Analyze that sentence, Paul.
July 7, 20205 yr 1 minute ago, Kz! said: lmao. "You are not going to like what I'm going to do." Analyze that sentence, Paul. Already did. He was going to feed her dog some delicious treats. She even took that away from her pet. We should add to the charges.
July 7, 20205 yr Just now, Paul852 said: Already did. He was going to feed her dog some delicious treats. She even took that away from her pet. We should add to the charges. So you think he was going to feed it treats. Then what? Leash it?
July 7, 20205 yr Just now, Kz! said: So you think he was going to feed it treats. Then what? Leash it? Kz, he was clearly forcing her to leash her dog. Come on, stop it. Even I'm getting bored with you right now.
July 7, 20205 yr 7 minutes ago, Paul852 said: Chick Fil A customer service is awesome. However, I think the place is massively overrated. It's still fast food. I maybe get it once or twice a month when we're busy with life.
July 7, 20205 yr 2 minutes ago, Paul852 said: Kz, he was clearly forcing her to leash her dog. Come on, stop it. Even I'm getting bored with you right now. How was he forcing her to leash her dog? I'm bored by the conversation is well, I just find it fascinating how far you'll go to avoid saying the obvious.
July 7, 20205 yr Just now, Kz! said: How was he forcing her to leash her dog? By coaxing the dog over to him with treats. Something she wouldn't have to worry about if her pet was LEASHED. That's how points are made. I guess you think he was going to what? Kill the dog? Kick it? She leashed the dog and then proceeded to call the police and say he threatened her life. She escalated the situation and she has paid dearly for it. Too bad. I can't believe I have poured so much time into this discussion
July 7, 20205 yr 2 minutes ago, Paul852 said: By coaxing the dog over to him with treats. Something she wouldn't have to worry about if her pet was LEASHED. That's how points are made. I guess you think he was going to what? Kill the dog? Kick it? She leashed the dog and then proceeded to call the police and say he threatened her life. She escalated the situation and she has paid dearly for it. Too bad. I can't believe I have poured so much time into this discussion But why would she feel the need to leash the dog? I don't know what he was going to do, exactly. I think he was going to do something that she didn't like, don't you? Keep going, Paul, we're getting close. lmao, white libs have to be guided slowly and methodically.
July 7, 20205 yr 3 minutes ago, Kz! said: But why would she feel the need to leash the dog? I don't know what he was going to do, exactly. I think he was going to do something that she didn't like, don't you? Keep going, Paul, we're getting close. lmao, white libs have to be guided slowly and methodically. Dude, you already lost. Move on.
July 7, 20205 yr 1 minute ago, Paul852 said: Dude, you already lost. Move on. So you think he was going to feed the dogs treats. This was the thing that she "wasn't going to like?"
July 7, 20205 yr Just now, Kz! said: So you think he was going to feed the dogs treats. This was the thing that she "wasn't going to like?" Yup. Do you think the police are wrong?
July 7, 20205 yr Just now, Paul852 said: Yup. Liberalism is a mental disorder lmao Look, I've already said both were wrong. It's really the only sane position on this story. She should have been following the park rules and should have leashed her dog after someone asked her to. He shouldn't have threatened the dog. They both suck.
July 7, 20205 yr 1 hour ago, mr_hunt said: just imagine if he threatened to feed the dog some mcdonald's food. 🤯 terrifying!!! 59 minutes ago, mr_hunt said: kkkarenz physically can't answer that question without adding in some variation of "black. guy. bad."...he just can't. 34 minutes ago, mr_hunt said: kkkz is reaching for that mustard again today. 27 minutes ago, mr_hunt said: totally. you're doing great. please keep going. 5 minutes ago, mr_hunt said: hunt not getting enough attention today lmao
July 7, 20205 yr 3 minutes ago, Kz! said: Liberalism is a mental disorder lmao Look, I've already said both were wrong. It's really the only sane position on this story. She should have been following the park rules and should have leashed her dog after someone asked her to. He shouldn't have threatened the dog.She shouldn't have filed a false police report. They both suck. FYP. I like how you have been incapable of having an argument without pointing out my race or political views several times. Really shows off your debate skillz.
July 7, 20205 yr 1 minute ago, Paul852 said: FYP. I like how you have been incapable of having an argument without pointing out my race or political views several times. Really shows off your debate skillz. Your race and political views have everything to do with the debate, obviously. It's not even a debate, really, it's just an acknowledgement of basic definitions lmao.
July 7, 20205 yr 1 minute ago, Kz! said: Your race and political views have everything to do with the debate, obviously. It's not even a debate, really, it's just an acknowledgement of basic definitions lmao. To you. Everything to do with the debate to you. Why do you have to play the race card?
July 7, 20205 yr To recap: Random Stranger: You better put that dog on a leash or you're not going to like what I'm going to do. *proceeds to coax the dog over to him with treats* Paul: He's not threatening the dog, he just wanted to feed him treats! This has been a multi-page "debate" and we've arrived at that^ conclusion. Again, this place should not be free. There is no way this content isn't worth a monthly subscription. For my part, I'll apologize to anyone that had to read all that.
July 7, 20205 yr I think the issue and misunderstanding here is The Police, the birdwatcher and "most" posters here believe the birdwatcher was going to give the dog a treat. In KZ's world the statement "You're not going to like it" accompanied with "Give the dog a treat" obviously means something different. I'm guessing in KZ's world this involves peanut butter and but sects... It's implied and can't be spoken of... that's why he won't just come out and say it. So everyone please, don't ever "threaten" KZ's dog. It has a different meaning in his world.
July 7, 20205 yr 1 minute ago, MidMoFo said: I think the issue and misunderstanding here is The Police, the birdwatcher and "most" posters here believe the birdwatcher was going to give the dog a treat. In KZ's world the statement "You're not going to like it" accompanied with "Give the dog a treat" obviously means something different. I'm guessing in KZ's world this involves peanut butter and but sects... It's implied and can't be spoken of... that's why he won't just come out and say it. So everyone please, don't ever "threaten" KZ's dog. It has a different meaning in his world. lmao liberalism is a mental disorder.
July 7, 20205 yr 1 minute ago, Kz! said: lmao liberalism is a mental disorder. wink: wink... I won't tell anyone your secret. Seriously though.. Get a grip, who gives a sheet about this? Why argue semantics and intent? Did this guy pump and dump your mom or something? Who cares?
Create an account or sign in to comment