January 28, 20223 yr 9 minutes ago, Outlaw said: Hell no, I'd take 8 years of Joe over 8 days of Nancy. but would you rather pet joe's hairy legs or give nancy's boobz a squeeze?
January 28, 20223 yr 18 minutes ago, mr_hunt said: but would you rather pet joe's hairy legs or give nancy's boobz a squeeze? Oh no doubt I'd grab those biguns. Those tiddies were taxpayer funded, I'm getting my money's worth. Probably look like two grapefruits in tube socks.
January 28, 20223 yr 2 hours ago, Ipiggles said: Again if this is where you get your news from, Or CNN, MSNBC, NPR... etc... thenp you are getting partisan propaganda. Just out of curiosity… where would you recommend I go for news that is free of partisan opinion?
January 28, 20223 yr 1 hour ago, Outlaw said: Oh no doubt I'd grab those biguns. Those tiddies were taxpayer funded, I'm getting my money's worth. Probably look like two grapefruits in tube socks. ewww Gross she's 80+ I aint grabbing 80+ year old tiddies until I am 90+ As it is, I am fortunate my wife at 55 has defied time and could pass for late 30's with no man made parts or work done.
January 28, 20223 yr 28 minutes ago, MidMoFo said: Just out of curiosity… where would you recommend I go for news that is free of partisan opinion? You can start with Associated Press, Rueters, BBC and WSJ. If you need contrast, add both Fox and CNN against the other 4 to see how the fringes are whipped up? Though, nothing is 100% non partisan anymore. You need to ferret out the facts vs opinions. It's amazing what happens, and how you feel about the world if you avoid CNN, Fox, MSNBC, Late night shows and all the other highly politicized outlets. All of the sudden, you become based, understand nuance. Like, you can support COVID vaccines, but not COVID vaccine Mandates, or support people who are trans without supporting giving a child under 18 the ability to change their gender.... etc.... I know there is a highly partisan contingent in CVON, it's an echo chamber. Flame on.
January 28, 20223 yr 11 minutes ago, Ipiggles said: You can start with Associated Press, Rueters, BBC and WSJ. If you need contrast, add both Fox and CNN against the other 4 to see how the fringes are whipped up? Though, nothing is 100% non partisan anymore. You need to ferret out the facts vs opinions. It's amazing what happens, and how you feel about the world if you avoid CNN, Fox, MSNBC, Late night shows and all the other highly politicized outlets. All of the sudden, you become based, understand nuance. Like, you can support COVID vaccines, but not COVID vaccine Mandates, or support people who are trans without supporting giving a child under 18 the ability to change their gender.... etc.... I know there is a highly partisan contingent in CVON, it's an echo chamber. Flame on. We agree. And judging by your posting history, you definitely strike me as a man that avoids Fox News.
January 28, 20223 yr 11 minutes ago, Ipiggles said: You can start with Associated Press, Rueters, BBC and WSJ. If you need contrast, add both Fox and CNN against the other 4 to see how the fringes are whipped up? Though, nothing is 100% non partisan anymore. You need to ferret out the facts vs opinions. It's amazing what happens, and how you feel about the world if you avoid CNN, Fox, MSNBC, Late night shows and all the other highly politicized outlets. All of the sudden, you become based, understand nuance. Like, you can support COVID vaccines, but not COVID vaccine Mandates, or support people who are trans without supporting giving a child under 18 the ability to change their gender.... etc.... I know there is a highly partisan contingent in CVON, it's an echo chamber. Flame on. The thing is, very few people here actually watch any of that cable news crap. People just accuse others of it as a cheap shot in an arguement. And for the bolded part: So you are saying I can vehemently opposes Trump and all other persons and things "Trumplican" and still be a registered republican and vote that way in most state and local elections? Are you sure that's possible?
January 28, 20223 yr 53 minutes ago, MidMoFo said: Just out of curiosity… where would you recommend I go for news that is free of partisan opinion? 26 minutes ago, Ipiggles said: You can start with Associated Press, Rueters, BBC and WSJ. If you need contrast, add both Fox and CNN against the other 4 to see how the fringes are whipped up? Though, nothing is 100% non partisan anymore. You need to ferret out the facts vs opinions. It's amazing what happens, and how you feel about the world if you avoid CNN, Fox, MSNBC, Late night shows and all the other highly politicized outlets. All of the sudden, you become based, understand nuance. Like, you can support COVID vaccines, but not COVID vaccine Mandates, or support people who are trans without supporting giving a child under 18 the ability to change their gender.... etc.... I know there is a highly partisan contingent in CVON, it's an echo chamber. Flame on. Perfect timing. This article just popped up. And even though it's AP it still has some partisan slant. Below I strikethrough the partisan slant and leave only the facts and not things meant to sway the reader to form a partisan opinion. which is how the article should have been written. https://apnews.com/article/pennsylvania-voting-donald-trump-tom-wolf-31b4e7d0b16a996c63079c8aa3c3b121 HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — A statewide court declared Friday that Pennsylvania’s expansive two-year-old mail-in voting law is unconstitutional, agreeing with challenges by Republicans . who soured on mail-in voting after then-President Donald Trump began baselessly attacking it as rife with fraud in 2020′s campaign. The decision, by a five-judge Commonwealth Court panel of three Republicans and two Democrats, could be put on hold immediately by an appeal from Gov. Tom Wolf’s administration to the state Supreme Court. Still, the decision throws Pennsylvania’s voting laws into doubt as the presidential battleground state’s voters prepare to elect a new governor and a new U.S. senator in 2022. Just over 2.5 million people voted under the law’s expansion of mail-in voting in 2020′s presidential election, most of them Democrats, out of 6.9 million total cast. Wolf’s office had no immediate comment Friday.
January 28, 20223 yr Hmmm Just a guess here, but there are probably security cameras all over the place. Surely we can identify the perps? I give it a 60% it's a false flag. 40% chance it's not. Conservative estimate. Probably more like 85% Falso 15% real. eitherway, the perps should be charged with a hate crime
January 28, 20223 yr 14 minutes ago, Ipiggles said: "Only a woman can get pregnant and give birth" Be kind, rewind.
January 28, 20223 yr 37 minutes ago, Ipiggles said: "Only a woman can get pregnant and give birth" Page me.
January 28, 20223 yr 1 minute ago, we_gotta_believe said: Don't forget to edit your config sys file to load extended memory. load"*",8,1 Going real old school
January 28, 20223 yr Just now, Outlaw said: load"*",8,1 Going real old school Jesus, gramps, take it easy. Was it cool being alive when the light bulb was invented? I bet it made the front page on all the papers after they were dropped off by the pony express.
January 28, 20223 yr 1 minute ago, we_gotta_believe said: Jesus, gramps, take it easy. Was it cool being alive when the light bulb was invented? I bet it made the front page on all the papers after they were dropped off by the pony express. I'm 40. Just remember that from my Commodore 64 when I was a kid.
January 28, 20223 yr 1 hour ago, Ipiggles said: Perfect timing. This article just popped up. And even though it's AP it still has some partisan slant. Below I strikethrough the partisan slant and leave only the facts and not things meant to sway the reader to form a partisan opinion. which is how the article should have been written. https://apnews.com/article/pennsylvania-voting-donald-trump-tom-wolf-31b4e7d0b16a996c63079c8aa3c3b121 HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — A statewide court declared Friday that Pennsylvania’s expansive two-year-old mail-in voting law is unconstitutional, agreeing with challenges by Republicans . who soured on mail-in voting after then-President Donald Trump began baselessly attacking it as rife with fraud in 2020′s campaign. The decision, by a five-judge Commonwealth Court panel of three Republicans and two Democrats, could be put on hold immediately by an appeal from Gov. Tom Wolf’s administration to the state Supreme Court. Still, the decision throws Pennsylvania’s voting laws into doubt as the presidential battleground state’s voters prepare to elect a new governor and a new U.S. senator in 2022. Just over 2.5 million people voted under the law’s expansion of mail-in voting in 2020′s presidential election, most of them Democrats, out of 6.9 million total cast. Wolf’s office had no immediate comment Friday. Nothing you crossed out is inaccurate. They are all facts relevant to the subject. Just because facts go against what you want reported as a partisan doesn't make them any less facts, or any less worthy of being part of a story. I'm sorry, but you don't have the right not to have your feelings hurt by factual reporting.
January 28, 20223 yr 2 hours ago, Ipiggles said: Perfect timing. This article just popped up. And even though it's AP it still has some partisan slant. Below I strikethrough the partisan slant and leave only the facts and not things meant to sway the reader to form a partisan opinion. which is how the article should have been written. https://apnews.com/article/pennsylvania-voting-donald-trump-tom-wolf-31b4e7d0b16a996c63079c8aa3c3b121 HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — A statewide court declared Friday that Pennsylvania’s expansive two-year-old mail-in voting law is unconstitutional, agreeing with challenges by Republicans . who soured on mail-in voting after then-President Donald Trump began baselessly attacking it as rife with fraud in 2020′s campaign. The decision, by a five-judge Commonwealth Court panel of three Republicans and two Democrats, could be put on hold immediately by an appeal from Gov. Tom Wolf’s administration to the state Supreme Court. Still, the decision throws Pennsylvania’s voting laws into doubt as the presidential battleground state’s voters prepare to elect a new governor and a new U.S. senator in 2022. Just over 2.5 million people voted under the law’s expansion of mail-in voting in 2020′s presidential election, most of them Democrats, out of 6.9 million total cast. Wolf’s office had no immediate comment Friday. Yeah, I learned about fact vs opinion in my 2nd grade English class. There’s also true vs false I suggest you look into as well. It’s my opinion, that it is more important, at this point, than just being able to spot an opinion. You’re almost there…
January 28, 20223 yr 27 minutes ago, MidMoFo said: Yeah, I learned about fact vs opinion in my 2nd grade English class. There’s also true vs false I suggest you look into as well. It’s my opinion, that it is more important, at this point, than just being able to spot an opinion. You’re almost there… This is rich with Irony. Continue flaming. This is exactly why I mostly choose not to get into discussions with hyper partisan individuals (either side) Congrats YOU HAVE ARRIVED. You are part of the echo chamber.
January 28, 20223 yr 1 minute ago, Ipiggles said: This is rich with Irony. Continue flaming. This is exactly why I mostly choose not to get into discussions with hyper partisan individuals (either side) Congrats YOU HAVE ARRIVED. You are part of the echo chamber. I’m not nearly as partisan as you think. A fact is a fact, whether you like it or not. A fact must be true, it can never be false. An opinion can be true or false.
January 28, 20223 yr Author 2 hours ago, Ipiggles said: "Only a woman can get pregnant and give birth" Eat a bag of deeks f@gg0t. it’s an insult not a lunch offer.
Create an account or sign in to comment