Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, pgcd3 said:

 

Wonder if that takes them out on DeRozan

As for Wiggins that would hard cap Sixers at 2nd apron I believe so not happening

They have been out on DeRozan before that they only have the mid level and he doesn't want that. 

  • Replies 10.8k
  • Views 264.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

13 minutes ago, Blazehound said:

A couple future seconds would be nice given the Warriors wheel should fall off in the next couple of years. 

Golden State also has a couple of Atlanta's seconds, in '26 and '28.  One of those would be nice but not sure GS would do it.

 

3 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

 

But if they get another salary back in the Hield trade they can send that for DFS and then they aren't taking back more salary than they send. 

  • Author

 

2 minutes ago, mr_hunt said:

 

Tony Bradley will solve our 4. Who needs DFS??

  • Author
1 minute ago, Khani1 said:

Tony Bradley will solve our 4. Who needs DFS??

i wouldn't hate him as a depth big. 

14 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

But if they get another salary back in the Hield trade they can send that for DFS and then they aren't taking back more salary than they send. 

They can use a trade exception at some point due to the trade. Not clear exactly. However if buddy is only going for 7-8 mil (what’s left of the warriors trade exception) i don’t believe it’s enough to acquire DFS using that exception 

8 minutes ago, mr_hunt said:

 

Romeo Langford was a prospect at one time.  

1 minute ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

They can use a trade exception at some point. Not clear exactly. However if buddy is only going for 7-8 mil i don’t believe it’s enough to acquire DFS using that exception 

Paul Reed 9 million plus another small salary from the warriors heading to the Nets to equal the DFS salary seems to be the goal. Then we don't take back extra cap. 

5 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

Paul Reed 9 million plus another small salary from the warriors heading to the Nets to equal the DFS salary seems to be the goal. Then we don't take back extra cap. 

Possible. It’s also possible they just get second round picks from the warriors. Would have to wait to see what they get. If they only get second round picks then they’d get those and a trade exception

sixers might go Caleb Martin if he costs less in terms of picks and contract than DFS. Also could decide to balloon Martin’s contract to use him as a piece at the deadline to match money. 

2 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Possible. It’s also possible they just get second round picks from the warriors. Would have to wait to see what they get. If they only get second round picks then they’d get those and a trade exception 

Might not know for a while the way the NBA executes trades in slow motion.  It is definitely the dumbest salary cap system out there. Designed to keep nerds in media

5 minutes ago, pgcd3 said:

Might not know for a while the way the NBA executes trades in slow motion.  It is definitely the dumbest salary cap system out there. Designed to keep nerds in media

it really does. Bryan does a pretty good job keeping up with it. I tend to trust him when he breaks down stuff. KJ Martin is going to get a balloon contract to use at the deadline to match salary 

Essentially, from what I’ve read from him, the Sixers don’t want to be hard capped via taking contracts back. Because they can balloon KJ Martin’s contract and then use it at the trade deadline to get a really good player or a good player because of that balloon contract. If they are hard capped by taking contracts back it’s more difficult to make that happen. 

13 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

it really does. Bryan does a pretty good job keeping up with it. I tend to trust him when he breaks down stuff. KJ Martin is going to get a balloon contract to use at the deadline to match salary 

Essentially, from what I’ve read from him, the Sixers don’t want to be hard capped via taking contracts back. Because they can balloon KJ Martin’s contract and then use it at the trade deadline to get a really good player or a good player because of that balloon contract. If they are hard capped by taking contracts back it’s more difficult to make that happen. 

I'm pretty sure it was the same guy in another tweet that said "not that it matters" but 7ers would get hard capped at 2nd apron. 

As if to say they would still make the move because they don't plan on getting to the 2nd apron anyway. 

7 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

I'm pretty sure it was the same guy in another tweet that said "not that it matters" but 7ers would get hard capped at 2nd apron. 

As if to say they would still make the move because they don't plan on getting to the 2nd apron anyway. 

In his article if they plan on doing a KJ Martin balloon contract if you are hard capped at either apron, it makes it way harder to do that. I am guessing if that’s the route they’re going they don’t want to be hard called and they’re gonna plan to exploit the fact that they can take advantage of KJ Martin cap hold and balloon contract and get a better player down the road at the deadline.

apparently the problem with doing a sign in trade with KJ Martin’s contract is if you do that is that only half the salary goes out to match.

what I think he’s been trying to say is that they might be better off waving Paul Reed using his money to sign someone like a Caleb Martin to that salary. Ballooning KJ Martin’s contract and using him at the deadline to improve the team with his inflated number.

 

IMG_1662.jpeg

2 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

In his article if they plan on doing a KJ Martin balloon contract if you are hard capped at either apron, it makes it way harder to do that. I am guessing if that’s the route they’re going they don’t want to be hard called and they’re gonna plan to exploit the fact that they can take advantage of KJ Martin cap hold and balloon contract and get a better player down the road at the deadline.

apparently the problem with doing a sign in trade with KJ Martin’s contract is if you do that is that only half the salary goes out to match.

what I think he’s been trying to say is that they might be better off waving Paul Reed using his money to sign someone like a Caleb Martin to that salary. Ballooning KJ Martin’s contract and using him at the deadline to improve the team with his inflated number. 

Yep in lieu of a great fit being available that’s probably the way to go. None of these trade options seem that much better than Martin if he’s gettable. They are a little better but not enough to lose future flexibility 

15 minutes ago, pgcd3 said:

Yep in lieu of a great fit being available that’s probably the way to go. None of these trade options seem that much better than Martin if he’s gettable. They are a little better but not enough to lose future flexibility 

from what I understand of it if you just wave Paul Reed and you sign hypothetically Caleb Martin to his money you stay below the hard cap apron completely. And it’s an upgrade. And frankly, it’s a decent contract for you. sixers are likely going to balloon KJ Martin‘s contract and exploit a stipulation in the cba that probably shouldn’t exist. at the deadline is gonna be super valuable if you need somebody to improve the roster due to that balloon contract. you’re gonna be able to match salary to get a player you probably want and could help your team. 

If the sixers only get picks back in the hield sign and trade then you are essentially hard capping yourself if you deal Reed for DFS and much harder to use Kj Martin’s exploited balloon contract 

 

11 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

 

Highsmith is a nice piece.  He was already a 6er once too. I was going to get interested in him if we couldn't get Martin. Maybe Martin is asking for too much.  Highsmith is a nice fallback option.

1 minute ago, HazletonEagle said:

Highsmith is a nice piece.  He was already a 6er once too. I was going to get interested in him if we couldn't get Martin. Maybe Martin is asking for too much.  Highsmith is a nice fallback option.

Fairly young guy with a 7 foot wingspan. 

15 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

Highsmith is a nice piece.  He was already a 6er once too. I was going to get interested in him if we couldn't get Martin. Maybe Martin is asking for too much.  Highsmith is a nice fallback option.

His PER 36 mins are good for a complimentary starter. Just have to hope he leaves miami and keeps getting better. 

3 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

His PER 36 mins are good for a complimentary starter. Just have to hope he leaves miami and keeps getting better. 

Yeah.  He's a good defender and has improved his 3pt% each year.  39% last year. 

He's the poor man's Mikal Bridges/OG Anunoby.

 

Banned from Phillies and Sixers 

2 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Banned from Phillies and Sixers 

BEAT IT!

Create an account or sign in to comment