Jump to content

Featured Replies

image.jpeg.0a6d00f87ef4136beda9356a35c2655a.jpeg

  • Replies 3k
  • Views 46.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Sorry @Mike31mt, but I laughed too hard not to post this. Not crapping on anyone's religion.  

  • VanHammersly
    VanHammersly

    Her name is Marla. Jesus trims the hedges. 

  • THE DIVINE PROTECTOR KALI, KEEPER OF THE SHAKTI, DESTROYER OF THE RAKTABIJA, LAUGHS AT YOUR MEEK, PITIFUL GOD! SHE WILL TEAR HIS TENDER HEART FROM HIS CHEST AND DINE ON IT IN A KATI ROLL WITH AN

Posted Images

image.jpeg.6f7de939b76d74f2611b273840b12f16.jpeg

 

Time to tax these trash institutions.

Screenshot_20240927_163558.jpg

image.jpeg.bfbf303f2035b81fada6b5956728cb94.jpeg

May be an image of text that says 'Secular Person: want to do X. Christian: You're free to do it. Secular Person: But you think X is wrong. Christian: Yes. Secular Person: Because you want to control me. Christian: No. You're free to do whatever you wish. Secular Person: But you think is wrong. Christian: Yes, but only because I want what's best for you. Secular Person: But want to do X. Christian: You're free to do it. Secular Person: But good. Christian: can't say that. want you to say that X Xis is Secular Person: Why are you such a hateful, intolerant bigot?'

46 minutes ago, sameaglesfan said:

May be an image of text that says 'Secular Person: want to do X. Christian: You're free to do it. Secular Person: But you think X is wrong. Christian: Yes. Secular Person: Because you want to control me. Christian: No. You're free to do whatever you wish. Secular Person: But you think is wrong. Christian: Yes, but only because I want what's best for you. Secular Person: But want to do X. Christian: You're free to do it. Secular Person: But good. Christian: can't say that. want you to say that X Xis is Secular Person: Why are you such a hateful, intolerant bigot?'

I’ll take conversations that never happen, for $2000. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

34 minutes ago, Tnt4philly said:

I’ll take conversations that never happen, for $2000. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

In that case…

Eagles fan 1: I think Nick Sirianni should get an extension. 
 

Eagles fan 2: I agree.

Eagles fan 3: Me too.

Eagles fan 4: Absolutely. 

Eagles fan 5: Lifetime contract, git ‘er done!

On 9/22/2024 at 9:32 AM, Mike31mt said:

If your oversimplified understanding of that statement is correct, then why does Jesus violate Jewish law repeatedly with his teachings?

From washing hands before eating to stoning an adulterous woman, there is example after example.  

This is the question you are desperate for me to answer? Really?

I have no idea why the book of folk tales you seem not to understand, or practice, has a God (or his son in human form, or possibly one third of him, the scripture is unclear) disguised as a Jewish fellow, who is sent intentionally to violate his own laws, and has himself killed because of those same laws, so he can be resurrected, so we know that God is love.

 

Can you explain it? I am on record saying the book makes no sense, it was written by MEN to control OTHER MEN, and women are basically property, but makes no sense most of the time, and pictures the most petulant loser of a God, with the worst behavior and morals, who made people, then killed most of them in a flood, because he gave them free will, and it somehow, bit him in the ass, which is weird, since he knew all, and forsees all, and has all power.

3 hours ago, Toastrel said:

This is the question you are desperate for me to answer? Really?

I have no idea why the book of folk tales you seem not to understand, or practice, has a God (or his son in human form, or possibly one third of him, the scripture is unclear) disguised as a Jewish fellow, who is sent intentionally to violate his own laws, and has himself killed because of those same laws, so he can be resurrected, so we know that God is love.

 

Can you explain it? I am on record saying the book makes no sense, it was written by MEN to control OTHER MEN, and women are basically property, but makes no sense most of the time, and pictures the most petulant loser of a God, with the worst behavior and morals, who made people, then killed most of them in a flood, because he gave them free will, and it somehow, bit him in the ass, which is weird, since he knew all, and forsees all, and has all power.

what about talking shrubbery doesn't make sense? :unsure:

10 hours ago, Arthur Jackson said:

shrubbery

Ni !

 

 

IMG_4107.jpeg

image.jpeg.4c60e2a40733ade0ed00f0a827aaebba.jpeg

On 10/1/2024 at 4:20 PM, Toastrel said:

This is the question you are desperate for me to answer? Really?

I have no idea why the book of folk tales you seem not to understand, or practice, has a God (or his son in human form, or possibly one third of him, the scripture is unclear) disguised as a Jewish fellow, who is sent intentionally to violate his own laws, and has himself killed because of those same laws, so he can be resurrected, so we know that God is love.

 

Can you explain it? I am on record saying the book makes no sense, it was written by MEN to control OTHER MEN, and women are basically property, but makes no sense most of the time, and pictures the most petulant loser of a God, with the worst behavior and morals, who made people, then killed most of them in a flood, because he gave them free will, and it somehow, bit him in the ass, which is weird, since he knew all, and forsees all, and has all power.

You could have stopped at "I have no idea"

What would you like me to explain?

 

Nothing written in the bible is to "control" other men. That's a conspiracy theory type of interpretation.

What do any of the authors get out of someone following the teachings of the Bible? Money? Power?  

  • 2 weeks later...
On 10/3/2024 at 7:37 AM, Mike31mt said:

What do any of the authors get out of someone following the teachings of the Bible? Money? Power?  

Do you mean now or in 1200 BCE?

 

 

 

Nevermind... don't answer. You won't understand anyway.

7 hours ago, Arthur Jackson said:

Do you mean now or in 1200 BCE?

 

 

 

Nevermind... don't answer. You won't understand anyway.

You mean BC?

8 minutes ago, Mike31mt said:

You mean BC?

No, Before Common Era is preferred in science. 

On 10/3/2024 at 8:37 AM, Mike31mt said:

What do any of the authors get out of someone following the teachings of the Bible? Money? Power?  

No one really knows who wrote any of the books of the Bible, but "all of the above,” for the men who canonized them, and continue to use them to control people. 

42 minutes ago, Tnt4philly said:

No, Before Common Era is preferred in science. 

It's the equivalent of saying "happy holidays" when everyone knows it's really "merry Christmas"

42 minutes ago, Tnt4philly said:

No one really knows who wrote any of the books of the Bible, but "all of the above,” for the men who canonized them, and continue to use them to control people. 

Control people for what?

Donations are voluntary.  Christian doctrine requires no political power or subservience to anyone.  

46 minutes ago, Mike31mt said:

It's the equivalent of saying "happy holidays" when everyone knows it's really "merry Christmas"

No, it’s realizing that not everyone is a Christian and celebrates the same holidays as you. It’s having the maturity to know the world doesn’t revolve around your beliefs. 

47 minutes ago, Mike31mt said:

Control people for what?

Donations are voluntary.  Christian doctrine requires no political power or subservience to anyone.  

Seriously? 🤦‍♂️ 

1 hour ago, Tnt4philly said:

No, it’s realizing that not everyone is a Christian and celebrates the same holidays as you. It’s having the maturity to know the world doesn’t revolve around your beliefs. 

Then create your own holiday, instead of celebrating on 12/25 and pretending it's not about Jesus

5 minutes ago, Mike31mt said:

Then create your own holiday, instead of celebrating on 12/25 and pretending it's not about Jesus

Why not celebrate Jesus when he was born? When the spring lambs are in the fields? Oh right, it was better marketing to move his birthday. Not like the truth matters.

Just now, Mike31mt said:

Then create your own holiday, instead of celebrating on 12/25 and pretending it's not about Jesus

Your ignorance of the history of own religion is constantly on full display. Just about everything about the Christmas holiday has been borrowed from Pagan rituals that were around long before Christ. 

 

Happy Holidays is a greeting that includes all and doesn’t assume a religion. Why does that bother you  

5 minutes ago, Toastrel said:

Why not celebrate Jesus when he was born? When the spring lambs are in the fields? Oh right, it was better marketing to move his birthday. Not like the truth matters.

Better marketing?  Lol

Again, what does anyone have to gain from Christians celebrating Christmas??  

You guys are conspiracy theorists.  Sorry it's an incredibly popular religion and it hurts your feelings.

3 minutes ago, Tnt4philly said:

Your ignorance of the history of own religion is constantly on full display. Just about everything about the Christmas holiday has been borrowed from Pagan rituals that were around long before Christ. 

 

Happy Holidays is a greeting that includes all and doesn’t assume a religion. Why does that bother you  

Ok, and?

It doesn't bother me at all, just stop pretending it's not about Christmas.  Last time I checked there are virtually no pagans around celebrating anything on December 25th.  Deal with it.

Create an account or sign in to comment