January 19, 20241 yr 12 minutes ago, Mike31mt said: Oh don't worry, you don't have to remind me how often you corrected your Catholic school teachers. You guys are so well read. Let's not forget that Buddhism believes in reincarnation (magic) and the Dalai Lama is a sexual predator. I remember how hard you tried telling us all about the very popular practice of tongue sucking. what does "Buddhism" believe in, again?
January 20, 20241 yr 27 minutes ago, Mike31mt said: Oh don't worry, you don't have to remind me how often you corrected your Catholic school teachers. You guys are so well read. Let's not forget that Buddhism believes in reincarnation (magic) and the Dalai Lama is a sexual predator. I remember how hard you tried telling us all about the very popular practice of tongue sucking. Apparently I do need to remind you for at least the third time that I am not Catholic and never went to Catholic school. Not all Buddhist believe in literal reincarnation, some see it as more of a rebirth, kind of like how some Christians say they are reborn. Other than that, you really are a sick POS.
January 20, 20241 yr 19 hours ago, Toastrel said: You're a shining example of right wing strength and brains. You on the otherhand are an anonymous quicky at random truck stops. 🫡
January 20, 20241 yr 18 hours ago, Boogyman said: At least he hasn't forsaken you like your parents. Do you feel his love?
January 20, 20241 yr 6 hours ago, lynched1 said: At least he hasn't forsaken you like your parents. Do you feel his love?
January 20, 20241 yr 6 hours ago, lynched1 said: At least he hasn't forsaken you like your parents. Do you feel his love? 😂 @lynched1 admitting trump is a con man of the morons and being too stupid to realize it. 😂
January 20, 20241 yr Just now, MidMoFo said: 😂 @lynched1 admitting trump is a con man of the morons and being too stupid to realize it. 😂 I dunno which one he even meant when he said "he".
January 20, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, Boogyman said: I dunno which one he even meant when he said "he". Yeah, "He” did everything in the meme according to the book of morons but…. At least he didn’t do some made up insult. 😂
January 20, 20241 yr 6 hours ago, MidMoFo said: 😂 @lynched1 admitting trump is a con man of the morons and being too stupid to realize it. 😂 I have not admitted nor denied anything you simple minded, inbred, window licking, ward of the state. The main failure in your repeated, weak-***ed attempts is that your insults lack a context you fail to grasp.
January 20, 20241 yr Even you heathens will know this one: As he was setting out on a journey, a man ran up, knelt down before him, and asked him, "Good teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?” Jesus answered him, "Why do you call me good?* No one is good but God alone. You know the commandments: ‘You shall not kill; you shall not commit adultery; you shall not steal; you shall not bear false witness; you shall not defraud; honor your father and your mother.’” He replied and said to him, "Teacher, all of these I have observed from my youth.” Jesus, looking at him, loved him and said to him, "You are lacking in one thing. Go, sell what you have, and give to [the] poor and you will have treasure in heaven; then come, follow me.” At that statement his face fell, and he went away sad, for he had many possessions. * Jesus looked around and said to his disciples, "How hard it is for those who have wealth to enter the kingdom of God!” The disciples were amazed at his words. So Jesus again said to them in reply, "Children, how hard it is to enter the kingdom of God! It is easier for a camel to pass through [the] eye of [a] needle than for one who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.”
January 20, 20241 yr 2 hours ago, lynched1 said: I have not admitted nor denied anything you simple minded, inbred, window licking, ward of the state. The main failure in your repeated, weak-***ed attempts is that your insults lack a context you fail to grasp.
January 20, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, Mike31mt said: Even you heathens will know this one: As he was setting out on a journey, a man ran up, knelt down before him, and asked him, "Good teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?” Jesus answered him, "Why do you call me good?* No one is good but God alone. You know the commandments: ‘You shall not kill; you shall not commit adultery; you shall not steal; you shall not bear false witness; you shall not defraud; honor your father and your mother.’” He replied and said to him, "Teacher, all of these I have observed from my youth.” Jesus, looking at him, loved him and said to him, "You are lacking in one thing. Go, sell what you have, and give to [the] poor and you will have treasure in heaven; then come, follow me.” At that statement his face fell, and he went away sad, for he had many possessions. * Jesus looked around and said to his disciples, "How hard it is for those who have wealth to enter the kingdom of God!” The disciples were amazed at his words. So Jesus again said to them in reply, "Children, how hard it is to enter the kingdom of God! It is easier for a camel to pass through [the] eye of [a] needle than for one who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.” How big was the man's hat?
January 20, 20241 yr Matthew Let's move on to Matthew. The Gospel of Matthew, by tradition, is attributed to the apostle of that name. Like Mark, this authorship tradition stems from Papias (it was also claimed by Irenaeus but he was probably parroting Papias). Papias clamed that, "Matthew composed the sayings [logia of Jesus] in the Hebrew language, and each one interpreted them as best he could." (Adv Haer 3:1:1). If such a Logia ever existed, it is not Canonical Matthew. GMatt is not a "sayings" Gospel for one thing and was not written in Hebrew for another. Furthermore, GMatt is largely dependent on Mark and (most probably) another written "sayings" tradition (in Greek, not Hebrew) called Q. Matt's dependence on Mark also puts its date somewhere around 80 CE (if not later) which is pushing the envelope for the plausibility of the author being a contemporary of Jesus. It's not impossible, of course, but this is an era when people generally didn't live much past forty or fifty years of age. The bigger obstacle for apostolic authorship is the fact that Matthew copies so extensively from secondary sources. An eyewitness should not be expected to copy verbatim from a non-eyewitness. There is also the fact that GMatt contains some of the more demonstrable fictions and signs of OT cannibalism but more on those aspects in their proper sections. It also bears repeating that the author Matthew never claims to have been an apostle or a witness, never states his name and never claims to have known any other witnesses. To sum up for Matthew: Papias claims that an apostle named Matthew compiled a sayings Gospel in Hebrew. The Canonical Gospel of Matthew is written in literary Greek and is not a sayings Gospel. The author never claims to have been an apostle or an eyewitness. It relies heavily on secondary Greek sources as well as the Septuagint. Once again, an eyewitness would not rely on the accounts of non-witnesses to recount events that he had supposedly seen for himself. It was written at least 50 years after the alleged crucifixion. The author includes demonstrable fictions which can clearly be shown to have been derived from the Septuagint. Papias' Logia, if it existed, has never been found.
January 21, 20241 yr 16 hours ago, Mike31mt said: Even you heathens will know this one: As he was setting out on a journey, a man ran up, knelt down before him, and asked him, "Good teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?” Jesus answered him, "Why do you call me good?* No one is good but God alone. You know the commandments: ‘You shall not kill; you shall not commit adultery; you shall not steal; you shall not bear false witness; you shall not defraud; honor your father and your mother.’” He replied and said to him, "Teacher, all of these I have observed from my youth.” Jesus, looking at him, loved him and said to him, "You are lacking in one thing. Go, sell what you have, and give to [the] poor and you will have treasure in heaven; then come, follow me.” At that statement his face fell, and he went away sad, for he had many possessions. * Jesus looked around and said to his disciples, "How hard it is for those who have wealth to enter the kingdom of God!” The disciples were amazed at his words. So Jesus again said to them in reply, "Children, how hard it is to enter the kingdom of God! It is easier for a camel to pass through [the] eye of [a] needle than for one who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.” Psh, nice try but I know propaganda from a lazy, socialist, libtard when I see one. More like the Gospel of Marx, amirite?
January 21, 20241 yr 14 hours ago, Tnt4philly said: Matthew Let's move on to Matthew. The Gospel of Matthew, by tradition, is attributed to the apostle of that name. Like Mark, this authorship tradition stems from Papias (it was also claimed by Irenaeus but he was probably parroting Papias). Papias clamed that, "Matthew composed the sayings [logia of Jesus] in the Hebrew language, and each one interpreted them as best he could." (Adv Haer 3:1:1). If such a Logia ever existed, it is not Canonical Matthew. GMatt is not a "sayings" Gospel for one thing and was not written in Hebrew for another. Furthermore, GMatt is largely dependent on Mark and (most probably) another written "sayings" tradition (in Greek, not Hebrew) called Q. Matt's dependence on Mark also puts its date somewhere around 80 CE (if not later) which is pushing the envelope for the plausibility of the author being a contemporary of Jesus. It's not impossible, of course, but this is an era when people generally didn't live much past forty or fifty years of age. The bigger obstacle for apostolic authorship is the fact that Matthew copies so extensively from secondary sources. An eyewitness should not be expected to copy verbatim from a non-eyewitness. There is also the fact that GMatt contains some of the more demonstrable fictions and signs of OT cannibalism but more on those aspects in their proper sections. It also bears repeating that the author Matthew never claims to have been an apostle or a witness, never states his name and never claims to have known any other witnesses. To sum up for Matthew: Papias claims that an apostle named Matthew compiled a sayings Gospel in Hebrew. The Canonical Gospel of Matthew is written in literary Greek and is not a sayings Gospel. The author never claims to have been an apostle or an eyewitness. It relies heavily on secondary Greek sources as well as the Septuagint. Once again, an eyewitness would not rely on the accounts of non-witnesses to recount events that he had supposedly seen for himself. It was written at least 50 years after the alleged crucifixion. The author includes demonstrable fictions which can clearly be shown to have been derived from the Septuagint. Papias' Logia, if it existed, has never been found. Nothing triggers TNT more than the gospel Sorry Jesus didn't hand write instructions for you not to be a Buddhist moron.
January 21, 20241 yr 6 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: Psh, nice try but I know propaganda from a lazy, socialist, libtard when I see one. More like the Gospel of Marx, amirite? And you claim you're not a ish lib, or are you just proudly owning it now? What does this have to do with a governmental system, of which Jesus clearly didn't participate?
January 21, 20241 yr 3 minutes ago, Mike31mt said: And you claim you're not a ish lib, or are you just proudly owning it now? What does this have to do with a governmental system, of which Jesus clearly didn't participate? Look here, Karl, we all know you're really poor and really stupid being that you're from WV and all where incest ranks higher than literacy, but you'll be damned if you think you're gonna trick me with some commie BS about giving away all my stuff to you.
January 21, 20241 yr 15 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: Look here, Karl, we all know you're really poor and really stupid being that you're from WV and all where incest ranks higher than literacy, but you'll be damned if you think you're gonna trick me with some commie BS about giving away all my stuff to you. Yeah, giving stuff to the poor directly. Is that socialism, WGB? It doesn't say "give it to Caesar so he can redistribute it" does it? You're not even a good ish lib. I guess it's because you're still relatively new at it, and spent most of your time training to be a fake libertarian.
January 21, 20241 yr 17 minutes ago, Mike31mt said: Yeah, giving stuff to the poor directly. Is that socialism, WGB? It doesn't say "give it to Caesar so he can redistribute it" does it? You're not even a good ish lib. I guess it's because you're still relatively new at it, and spent most of your time training to be a fake libertarian. I don't care how poor you are, my stuff is my stuff, get your little filthy commie paws away from it and go get yourself a job, moocher.
January 21, 20241 yr 37 minutes ago, Mike31mt said: Nothing triggers TNT more than the gospel Sorry Jesus didn't hand write instructions for you not to be a Buddhist moron. I simply posted some interesting points about the book of Matthew. How you interpret and react to them is on you.
January 21, 20241 yr 11 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: I don't care how poor you are, my stuff is my stuff, get your little filthy commie paws away from it and go get yourself a job, moocher. "Ddeeerrpp giving to the poor is the Socializum!"
Create an account or sign in to comment