1 minute ago, mattwill said:

Boss, as in a community elder. Everyone on these boards qualifies as elders in this community, so give them the respect they deserve, and make their job easier rather than put obstacles in their way.

Common courtesy, taught to children by their parents at a young age.

Elder…doesn’t equal boss…or wisdom…sorry you never were taught that. I judge you on the very simple proven method of basing it on what you earned. I’m not age-ist at all. I treat all equally free as possible of preconceived judgements.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I supply it all…call it like I see them. Everybody should back me up on this point. You definitely get my two cents on each move.

We get your two Denarius worth.

32 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

But it’s so very effective weapon…don’t underestimate the damage sporty Gibbs can do getting the ball in his hands(especially out past the huge lineman trapping the backfield)

Why don't we do that with Shipley?

27 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Teams pass…and teams run

Jebus I never knew this, thanks for the info. Just tremendous insight

4 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Elder…doesn’t equal boss…or wisdom…sorry you never were taught that. I judge you on the very simple proven method of basing it on what you earned. I’m not age-ist at all. I treat all equally free as possible of preconceived judgements.

Indeed. You treat all equally badly.

No manners and no shame.

10 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

This is your contribution..look in the mirror

I did and I can answer point blank questions. Your turn, because you continue to fail at it

26 minutes ago, capmaster24 said:

Against our zone defense, 3 short passes to Gibbs is the biggest issue?

In all its varying forms it’s a big issue. Flat out from the basic production of just running the play it’s a good weapon. I’m trying to get you to thinking about those next levels of benefits this play effects. Telling you it starts right from Fangio gameplanning for this week. He has to account for this play. Can’t sell out blitzing….unless maybe Fangio has a defender making sure to attack Gibbs not even letting him get out quickly freely in coverage.

How do account for Gibbs each play on coverage? He can come out left, right or center. Really risky packing the box with

a S. My point also is Blankenship would be a terrible matchup against Gibbs for us also. Baun has been balling…but that’s not due to being put in situations alone in space against Gibbs.

8 minutes ago, mattwill said:

We get your two Denarius worth.

See…no matter what or who…can’t be attempted to question whether my two cents has been given on most anything Eagles.

1 hour ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

@cunninghamtheman

who was the one turning the ball over so much in "23?

So Ham what is your answer to taters question?

10 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Why don't we do that with Shipley?

Exactly what my thoughts have been. Actually saw it was even the original plan from the jump with Moore. Saquan’s ultimate season obviously trumped that. Understandable. But it’s such a clear good -to great weapon. Just another underutilized O weapon stunted under Siri O and one step approach thinking.

7 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

In all its varying forms it’s a big issue. Flat out from the basic production of just running the play it’s a good weapon. I’m trying to get you to thinking about those next levels of benefits this play effects. Telling you it starts right from Fangio gameplanning for this week. He has to account for this play. Can’t sell out blitzing….unless maybe Fangio has a defender making sure to attack Gibbs not even letting him get out quickly freely in coverage.

Don't you think Fangio knows about this stuff, or are you better at it?

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Exactly what my thoughts have been. Actually saw it was even the original plan from the jump with Moore. Saquan’s ultimate season obviously trumped that. Understandable. But it’s such a clear good -to great weapon. Just another underutilized O weapon stunted under Siri O and one step approach thinking.

LOL this is why the guy you hated, GAINS did his job, Now Gains is gone and Ship hasn't stepped up

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

another underutilized O weapon stunted under Siri O

Or Ship isn't as good as Gains was?? Hurts can't call an audible at the LOS after looking over the defense?

I think Bigsby would be better at this(running inside routes) than Ship

11 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Jebus I never knew this, thanks for the info. Just tremendous insight

How often do you hear how we/they try to make the opponent one dimensional? Then we really T off…go after sack records even a few years back. If you can understand this concept? Then flip the sc

6 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Don't you think Fangio knows about this stuff, or are you better at it?

Exactly what I’m stating is Fangio is VERY aware. It will effect all phases of Fangio thinking in this matchup. See the production from the play itself? That worth calling it. But that’s just the top of its effect on each game.

7 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Exactly what my thoughts have been. Actually saw it was even the original plan from the jump with Moore. Saquan’s ultimate season obviously trumped that. Understandable. But it’s such a clear good -to great weapon. Just another underutilized O weapon stunted under Siri O and one step approach thinking.

I would stop bashing Siri. He's the winningest coach in franchise history and it makes you look stupid

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

How often do you hear how we/they try to make the opponent one dimensional? Then we really T off…go after sack records even a few years back. If you can understand this concept? Then flip the sc

Exactly what I’m stating is Fangio is VERY aware. It will effect all phases of Fangio thinking in this matchup. See the production from the play itself? That worth calling it. But that’s just the top of its effect on each game.

So let Fangio do it. He gets paid to,you don't

10 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So Ham what is your answer to taters question?

Still no answer. Your 4th grader can answer this right now

15 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

How do account for Gibbs each play on coverage? He can come out left, right or center. Really risky packing the box with

a S. My point also is Blankenship would be a terrible matchup against Gibbs for us also. Baun has been balling…but that’s not due to being put in situations alone in space against Gibbs.

Replace the word Gibbs with Barkley and ask Dan Campbell the same question

I suspect DeJean would be involved with Gibbs coming out of the backfield depending where he came out? If he goes right you have DeJean, if he goes left you have Baun? IDK I will let Fangio deal with that.that's why we pay him

13 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So Ham what is your answer to taters question?

I did answer it…you just don’t like..can’t comprehend…just can’t get far enough with my logic about the game of football. Team sport where it takes everybody working together as ONE. You both just can’t even still appreciate just how unbelievably incredible our O playmakers were in 2023. They were overcoming the worst O scheme/O system/playcalling accomplishing all they did. They put up stats…which I realize you at least see those.

But doing it with the opponent already knowing your play? Wait a minute…just go back to earlier today when I posted our big D stop. Ojomo read their playcall. If you can’t hear it from me? Listen to Ojomo, our own defender tell you how big an advantage it creates. Listen to Love tell you about it. Listen to Jacobs realizing we read their playcall and how he even tried to go against the rest of his O to avoid the trap.

20 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

See…no matter what or who…can’t be attempted to question whether my two cents has been given on most anything Eagles.

There is no question that you give copiously. The description of what you give is another story. You are a proud follower of the saying, "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush."

18 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Don't you think Fangio knows about this stuff, or are you better at it?

All I’m doing is pointing out exactly what I’d believe Fangio is considering. I believe this one play Fangio specifically ran though how we need to adjust to defend for this matchup right today in practice even.

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I did answer it…you just don’t like..can’t comprehend…just can’t get far enough with my logic about the game of football. Team sport where it takes everybody working together as ONE. You both just can’t even still appreciate just how unbelievably incredible our O playmakers were in 2023. They were overcoming the worst O scheme/O system/playcalling accomplishing all they did. They put up stats…which I realize you at least see those.

But doing it with the opponent already knowing your play? Wait a minute…just go back to earlier today when I posted our big D stop. Ojomo read their playcall. If you can’t hear it from me? Listen to Ojomo, our own defender tell you how big an advantage it creates. Listen to Love tell you about it. Listen to Jacobs realizing we read their playcall and how he even tried to go against the rest of his O to avoid the trap.

Totally off the topic question asked. Your words are like the Voynich manuscript and you still refuse to answer the question which is a single word LOL