1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I’m laying it all out there on a platter for you explaining. It effects Fangio whole gameplan and playcalling. Much more that just being simple minded basing things only on exact production running this play. Fangio has to hesitate calling blitzes just because of this counter would crush that D. On and on..

Fangio just got here. He is a rookie who needs your advice 🤣

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

The Gibbs quick passing matchup advantage creates conflict with our D. Everything Fangio does. But our defenders can’t just go for it.

So a quick pass out in the flat is a conflict? and the #1 concern?

20 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LMFAO-Whoomp there it is. Gains started a game OMG!!!!!!! Sanders, that "special talent" who was demoted to RB3 when he left

I even explained how Sanders style change for Siri exactly what screwed him in Carolina. His original play style was needed there instead. He did that for us…

15 minutes ago, capmaster24 said:

But we need to draft RB next year even though we have Barkley, Tank and Shipley?

What production are you expecting from Saquan and Tank two or three years from now? Draft longer term than your short term one step thinking.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

The Gibbs quick passing matchup advantage creates conflict with our D. Everything Fangio does. But our defenders can’t just go for it.

A quick pass actually is an easy read and avoids conflict. The LBs go right over to cover, there are no fakes just a quick pass. I would prefer that type of play call, then Gibbs catches the ball in the flat, no screen set up. Perfect. Better than play action or longer time to clear out the zone and or give time for an LB to blitz or run out of position. Hike and a quick pass to one side without any deception. I'll take that all day.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I even explained how Sanders style change for Siri exactly what screwed him in Carolina. His original play style was needed there instead. He did that for us…

LMAO

16 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I would put Bigsby in that role

I wanted Shipley in the role Tank is performing now even. But can’t complain much about how Tank is very effective in his little limited rushing role.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

What production are you expecting from Saquan and Tank two or three years from now? Draft longer term than your short term one step thinking.

So you are going to draft a #4 RB due to 3 years down the line. More so, you expect Howie with his draft history of doing so? Really?

17 minutes ago, capmaster24 said:

Why is that< he never answers a question so we can move on , instead keeping the conversation going in a circle???

All I’ve been doing is answering questions. Think I’m actually the only one that actually has been in fact.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

What production are you expecting from Saquan and Tank two or three years from now? Draft longer term than your short term one step thinking.

Howie gets established RB's ??? Bark, Tank, Dillon?

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

I wanted Shipley in the role Tank is performing now even. But can’t complain much about how Tank is very effective in his little limited rushing role.

They drafted Shipley on Gainwell's last year, it seems to be the trend for Howie, every 3 or 4 years. But due to losing multiple RBs. Next year would be the exact year you would think he avoids actually drafting an RB being that we have a quality 3 already. I could see UDFA though as usual.

18 minutes ago, capmaster24 said:

Why is that< he never answers a question so we can move on , instead keeping the conversation going in a circle???

You have such very limited knowledge around here…yet in your short time here I’ve extensively directly answered you.

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

All I’ve been doing is answering questions. Think I’m actually the only one that actually has been in fact.

All you have been doing is saying you have been doing but never actually doing. Circle

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

All I’ve been doing is answering questions. Think I’m actually the only one that actually has been in fact.

You didn't answer Taters yet

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

You have such very limited knowledge around here…yet in your short time here I’ve extensively directly answered you.

Been on here for about 20 years

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

You have such very limited knowledge around here…yet in your short time here I’ve extensively directly answered you.

You have knowledge of what " tampering" is yet

1 minute ago, capmaster24 said:

They drafted Shipley on Gainwell's last year, it seems to be the trend for Howie, every 3 or 4 years. But due to losing multiple RBs. Next year would be the exact year you would think he avoids actually drafting an RB being that we have a quality 3 already. I could see UDFA though as usual.

I want MJ back he did really well here

2 minutes ago, capmaster24 said:

So you are going to draft a #4 RB due to 3 years down the line. More so, you expect Howie with his draft history of doing so? Really?

Like I’ve consistently thought our team has prioritized building around physical rushing team. So I’ve found it important. Saquan I just can’t count on for many more seasons ahead. I’m even high on Shipley. How long is Tank committed to even being here?

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You have such very limited knowledge around here…yet in your short time here I’ve extensively directly answered you.

You have been a toolbag for years

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Like I’ve consistently thought our team has prioritized building around physical rushing team. So I’ve found it important. Saquan I just can’t count on for many more seasons ahead. I’m even high on Shipley. How long is Tank committed to even being here?

But why can't we draft a RB the following year or even after that? RB can play right away as a backup... and even with injury you can get a decent one for cheap

15 minutes ago, capmaster24 said:

Doesn't make sense with this guy, he is the only one I've seen on this board in a couple decades that does this? Instantly combative with everything. To me it almost seems fake? Like " you are on candid camera" type thing?

How about you supply anything worthy of quality discussion and see what happens?

19 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

IDK totally whiffed on the WR conversation about TB LOL Went another direction

Great example. Evans and Godwin…yet drafted Egbuka…looking like a real smart organization changing decision to me.

20 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

IDK totally whiffed on the WR conversation about TB LOL Went another direction

I see a perfect laid out example with the Bucs showing you why indeed

17 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

No he doesn't

Have you watched the Lions at all? Clearly you followed the draft. What was Gibbs forty time?

16 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LOL Dean is not an "ouch" He is a very fast closer who can help with coverage on Gibbs if he runs right or even to the middle to help the LB's

Dean hasn’t been playing coming back from injury. Even healthy how fast is Dean? Even at his best.