In my view: just because any person is the best ..or good..doesn’t equal perfect on everything.

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

In my view: just because any person is the best ..or good..doesn’t equal perfect on everything.

Not just all rainbows or all busts.

42 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Swift was going to start no matter/ Week 1 maybe he was sick,or needed another week for our playbook. LOTS of reason he didnt start. It was one week,who gives a crap?

Just weak endless excuses for Siri regardless. You endlessly stated you believed RB doesn’t matter it’s all Oline…so committe lead by Gainwell you favored.

26 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Gains sucks,you told us so

I like Gainwell…just as a third string RB..which offends you

44 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

You can't talk to the player... you have to talk to the agent. The " tampering " had nothing to do with any window. Howie couldn't talk directly to Barkley before or after the " window" only after the league year started.

You just don't seem to get that concept. The window wasn't the issue at all.

You don’t get the difference in tampering..and what the league will punish further tampering is all. I stated I believe everybody operates by tampering..so it’s business as usual.

47 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Only one who understands LMAO

Well in fact yes exactly

30 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Did nothing but impress everyone. His only "fault" was we were full up in the RB room. Just clueless

I have zero desire to tear the kid down. I just differ in what I judge and prioritize. I prioritize how a player can perform in the SB…while you judge based on TC..wait..one rumor from a second hand source about what happened.

30 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

You think you have earned the respect of your peers?

I do…

39 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Narcissism at its finest. The world revolves around him. Even here, not about the Eagles, all about himself. It's both comical and sad.

Sure a guy has more right contributing little of value here in a couple of months to be the judge about my position here

On 3/14/2024 at 1:51 PM, cunninghamtheman said:

We might lose a draft pick here fellas. It’s all BS though. We all know these GMs are working things before it’s legal. They even created a whole "legal tampering period” recognizing this fact. Same old stuff different decade. They probably gave us nailed if they so choose to make a stink about it. But it would really just highlight something the whole league is engaged in. Something they really will never be able to fix. GMs and agents are going to communicate. 

This last sentence " GMs and agents are going to communicate " you are implying this was the tampering when it clearly wasn't.

I tried ti explain to you the investigations for both Cousins and Barkley were if they spoke directly to any member of the Falcons or Eagles. Had nothing to do with GMs talking to agents or any window. You brought up the window and the agent, was never brought up in any article about the tampering. That was all you, you weren't repeating anything.

39 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Right because clicking on it would prove you WRONG yet again, Clueless

It would prove he produced in any meaningful NFL games and situations? No. You are propping a guy up over one guy rumors during a couple of TC practices.

Just now, joemas6 said:

This last sentence " GMs and agents are going to communicate " you are implying this was the tampering when it clearly wasn't.

I tried ti explain to you the investigations for both Cousins and Barkley were if they spoke directly to any member of the Falcons or Eagles. Had nothing to do with GMs talking to agents or any window. You brought up the window and the agent, was never brought up in any article about the tampering. That was all you, you weren't repeating anything.

Right, he mentions " Before it's legal" and "GMs talking to agents." No clue what the investigation was about.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Sure a guy has more right contributing little of value here in a couple of months to be the judge about my position here

Just curious, what do you think you contribute? News? Rules? Facts? or just opinions?

32 minutes ago, capmaster24 said:

So who is more useful to where teams have used the player more? Sanders or Gainwell? Why do both the Eagles and Pittsburgh trust Gainwell in multiple situations and yet Sanders doesn't seem to be liked by any team?

Sanders produced his rookie season more than Gainwell will ever dream to accomplish. Sanders had a Pro Bowl season. But yeah I’ll volunteer Sanders not too bright. Doesn’t get the situational football stuff.

But Sanders straight changed up his whole style for Siri. Worked great for us here. But nothing but death to any player there. Pretty obvious.

Just now, capmaster24 said:

Just curious, what do you think you contribute? News? Rules? Facts? or just opinions?

Nope....just " i called it" like you remember he liked a draft pick from 6 years ago...or more importantly give two $÷=ts about it... lol

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

But Sanders straight changed up his whole style for Siri. Worked great for us here. But nothing but death to any player there. Pretty obvious.

All I see is Gainwell has benefitted massively from being propped up higher than his abilities. Yet with all the extra opportunities not produced much if anything.

Like I said …I like Gainwell…he’s just limited…quality trusted third string RB option.

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

But Sanders straight changed up his whole style for Siri. Worked great for us here. But nothing but death to any player there. Pretty obvious.

Why didn't Sanders work out elsewhere? Why didn't anyone pay Reddick?

Why do you fail to realize the rest of the league agrees that Sanders isn't quality and Reddick isn't worth the money...why do you only see Rosie and Siri??? Why so ignorant about it?

38 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Gains sucks,you told us so

Not what I said. False words you force into my mouth trying to make me look incorrect. Actually just proves that’s what you need to do to counter my actual thoughts. You can’t challenge my actual words…so must make up stuff. Good luck!

3 minutes ago, capmaster24 said:

Just curious, what do you think you contribute? News? Rules? Facts? or just opinions?

Don't forget 7 year old nicknames! Back in the day we would use a word that rhymes with day to describe that stuff.

37 minutes ago, capmaster24 said:

So who is more useful to where teams have used the player more? Sanders or Gainwell? Why do both the Eagles and Pittsburgh trust Gainwell in multiple situations and yet Sanders doesn't seem to be liked by any team?

Which guy could we trust in the SB?

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Was he talking to the players directly? I don't THINK so

He was telling mgt/owner who he wanted and they talked to agents not the players

28 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

It’s top level football. We have our matchup advantages also.

IDK my concern is once again CB2

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Which guy could we trust in the SB?

Sanders to not fumble

37 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

In TC this is true of ANY player. MJ never got the chance because we were full up at RB. That was his "fault" not lack of performing. Just clueless

I never said anything against the player. Just don’t call some second hand report about TC earning or producing anything.