6 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Again you and No MAs both claim I don’t answer questions directly…I mean right on the two is of a couple of pages of me answering a dozen questions at least.

Dude...go back and read some posts from the last couple of days... you think it's just me and Cap that say you don't answer a question? Lol. GB, BG, Tate, Matt, Lambo...all have said it.

Wow the narcissistic mindset you have is just off the charts!

5 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I’m not the one missing it. Tampering…just isn’t what you two are referring to. That’s a main key issue. Your are referring to one specific form of tampering only,

Tampering...for the specific situation regarding Barkley...and Cousins... was simply if there was direct contact with the player. That's it. The other 22 ways if Tampering don't matter, it was One...1...Uno... type of specific Tampering that was being investigated. Your original post showed that you didn't understand this, I tried to explain, yet once your mind wanders off topic ...that's it. Your ego or just your lack of attention... or maybe just want you want to be the narrative ...that takes over and the actual reality of a situation...you completely miss.

5 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

To me the fact every team tampers was relevant. Followed up by my low level of concern.

Because to you...reality of a specific situation...takes a back seat to what is happening on planet Ham.

We weren't going to lose a draft pick...zero chance...because Howie doesn't talk directly to players. He is well experienced in signing free agents...notice the second word....agents.

Every team may tamper in the manner that you think.....irrelevant to what the Eagles were being investigated for. You are like talking to a wall.

14 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

You answer every time with... " i just answered " but don't ever give an answer..

Just state that you gave an answer. It's interesting how people come on here and you can't grasp the fact that you are perceived as the village idiot? Just baffling?

It actually isn’t baffling. He doesn’t give any direct answers to direct questions. What he gives are dissertations that talk all around the question, but never directly address the specific question. It is a text book example of, "If you can’t bedazzle with brilliance, baffle with BS.”

4 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Great tune

3 hours ago, mattwill said:

No logic involved at all … flawed or otherwise. Joe was simply making a factual observation about what the Eagles were doing vis-a-vis paying RBs. Reporting simple facts that are right there in front of everyone’s eyes to see.

Your agenda makes you blind.

See...with Ham, everything is extreme. Like you just saw...because multiple people on here don't think " the MOST important thing" is Gibbs catching balls. Ham automatically translates that as.. we don't think it's important at all.

So when I point out that Howie isn't paying just an above average RB...and neither would I ( see Ham was pissed at losing Sanders...similar to why he keeps mentioning Isaiah Rodgers at CB) ... he doesn't get the concept of not overpaying average talent like they are stars... he would overpay every position instead of taking a slight step back.

So because neither me or Howie wanted to pay $6mil for Sanders...that meant we didn't want to pay RB at all. My point and you saw Howie agree....Barkley was way above the idea of just paying " A RB" Barkley was elite level...game changer. Not Miles Sanders or Isaiah Rodgers types that just plug a hole.

That type of player is worth spending money on...regardless of position.

We didn't spend money on LB....until Baun...Baun was elite, that's why he got paid. Ham wants to spend spend and spend just to plug holes. He has no clue that good franchises don't over pay just to plug every hole. Then it sets the rate for the entire team.

That's why we get rid of guys when they don't show value... like a Reddick or a Huff.

The old Howie tried to plug holes by spending...never worked out.

4 hours ago, Lambo said:

Why couldn’t the Eagles have won a Super Bowl with a 1200 yard lead rusher last year? With Jalen Hurts as the QB, and those skill guys and the best O Line in football, should have been able to plug anyone in.

Dude...you opened pandora's box. Lol

3 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

He wanted to pay Sanders 4+ million a year

$6 million per

3 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

He wanted to pay Sanders 4+ million a year

Remember he call Sanders a " special talent"

1 hour ago, joemas6 said:

See...with Ham, everything is extreme. Like you just saw...because multiple people on here don't think " the MOST important thing" is Gibbs catching balls. Ham automatically translates that as.. we don't think it's important at all.

So when I point out that Howie isn't paying just an above average RB...and neither would I ( see Ham was pissed at losing Sanders...similar to why he keeps mentioning Isaiah Rodgers at CB) ... he doesn't get the concept of not overpaying average talent like they are stars... he would overpay every position instead of taking a slight step back.

So because neither me or Howie wanted to pay $6mil for Sanders...that meant we didn't want to pay RB at all. My point and you saw Howie agree....Barkley was way above the idea of just paying " A RB" Barkley was elite level...game changer. Not Miles Sanders or Isaiah Rodgers types that just plug a hole.

That type of player is worth spending money on...regardless of position.

We didn't spend money on LB....until Baun...Baun was elite, that's why he got paid. Ham wants to spend spend and spend just to plug holes. He has no clue that good franchises don't over pay just to plug every hole. Then it sets the rate for the entire team.

That's why we get rid of guys when they don't show value... like a Reddick or a Huff.

The old Howie tried to plug holes by spending...never worked out.

Pfffffft You're just a hater 🤣

1 hour ago, joemas6 said:

  6 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

OT- I stole the pic off the net because of Hams droning. However, this example is quite rare. if you notice the center section was never cut out(in the 70's we had discs that filled in that hole so you could play them on stereos). There are not many of these around, most were removed before being sent to record shops/distributors). The example shown was the demo sent out to DJ's. Very rare, and worth a dang fortune. So why was this? Keeping the center section in prevented warping during shipping because the demos were sent individually. The center hole was drilled to play on DJ turntables(aka 33 RPM posts). The ones you and I could buy had the centers cut out(and smoothed and were shipped with many pressed together in the box and if the end ones warped, no big deal toss them but most had wood on the ends in shipping or thick carboard to prevent warps). You can see it was pressed this way by the continuous line of the logo/label. Just an FYI in case this is your final Jeopardy question LOL. I forget the song but one DJ put one of these on and forgot to change the speed. It was hilarious hearing a 45 at 33 RPM blasting over the airwaves. Class dismissed

1 hour ago, joemas6 said:

$6 million per

Oh my bad, that's even worse

1 hour ago, joemas6 said:

Remember he call Sanders a " special talent"

He was "special". He took the short bus right out of town after he was relegated to RB3 and couldn't hold that either

On 11/13/2025 at 10:53 PM, Lambo said:

Did you stand alone that it only took Barkley having a historic season for Hurts to win a title

I was the guy against the theory of don’t go after a big RB to take advantage of how our team prioritized massive road grading Oline. So yeah…been explaining this would happen for years if we just got the RB. Actually my thoughts were two headed monster RB backfield potentially also. Thanks ..you’re catching on. I don’t feel like it was any special thinking on my part though. Seems so very basic and obvious to me.

On 11/13/2025 at 10:02 PM, joemas6 said:

He is pretty much correct. Yet you will die on the hill and everyone sees it. If either of us were wrong why wouldn't anyone chime in. Because we all know what the tampering issue was and it had zero to do with a window.

I brought that point up showing how every team tampers…explaining my view as no big deal. I reported the investigation and shared Eveybody tampers..big deal. You made it into anything more…because I never said anything more…other than we could lose a draft pick. Tamper and get Saquan docked a fourth round pick. Would you be fine with that? I’d forfeit a fourth for the parade and hopefully a repeat.

How did things ever get twisted from me saying everybody tampers no big deal…to whatever you trying to make all extra out of it? Total BS with you creating a fictional argument from me you can counter and successfully look correct on something.

6 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I was the guy against the theory of don’t go after a big RB to take advantage of how our team prioritized massive road grading Oline. So yeah…been explaining this would happen for years if we just got the RB. Actually my thoughts were two headed monster RB backfield potentially also. Thanks ..you’re catching on. I don’t feel like it was any special thinking on my part though. Seems so very basic and obvious to me.

🤣🤣OMG I'm LMFAO. The backtracking here is just AMAZING 🤣🤣 Wanted to pay Sanders some ridiculous amount, Before Bark could be had which RB's did you want to overpay that were in the FA pool?

What interaction did I ever claim happened with Saquan tampering? When did I suggest his agent talked to Rosie illegally why they investigated? None of this happened…not even slightly. What are you even trying to twist into being my words and opinions? If it’s more than every team tampers…no biggie…it’s fictional created by you just to argue against a point I never made.

https://walterfootball.com/freeagents2023RB.php Here were the FA RB's Most were franchise tagged. We got Penny in(signed), we let Sanders walk We could have brought Zeke in (LOL) so which high dollar RB did you want before Bark became avilable? List the guys that are free to get that you want to pay 4+ million a year to from this list

17 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

RB to take advantage of how our team prioritized massive road grading Oline.

Don't you think this was the cause for success for Sanders? How did he do when he left that "massive road grading O line"?

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

OMG I'm LMFAO. The backtracking is just AMAZING 🤣🤣

I consistent the whole time argued against you guys beating the table for a RB. While I’m getting this out there might as well add a LB and S also. Can’t mention these without mentioning qualified O mind. But really harped on Rosie wouldn’t risk giving power up…so he wouldn’t hire top coaches that command such power..finally got Fangio.

Consistently been preaching these exact issues as Rosie flaws holding us back. For years. We did exactly win the SB in dominating fashion immediatly when Rosie evolved to do such. Is it "I Called it?” Is it just more on my track record of resume? Not even anything special to me..simple and obvious.

On 11/13/2025 at 10:06 PM, GreenbleedinNC said:

Joe and I were labeled #Hurtshaters(as childish as it is)  because since he became our starter we pointed out things he had to improve because we held Hurts to the same bar we hold anyone else. When he screwed up we called Hurts out instead of waving pom poms and bowing to a bronze statue

How else could you be described than #HurtsHater? Neither of you mentioned any other SB play from 2022 more than twice. But the Hurts fumble you’ve both bashed to death…like 50 times. Guy was absolutely amazing that day..but you two only saw the fumble the young QB made that mistake with the mountain of pressure placed on his shoulders. One fumble unforced…otherwise thriving on the biggest stage at a level as high as anybody ever.

On 11/13/2025 at 10:53 PM, Lambo said:

Did you stand alone that it only took Barkley having a historic season for Hurts to win a title

Nah..refs don’t fix the first SB and Hurts gets the ball back he’d have two already. We all know it…refs knew it enough they wouldn’t allow the opportunity to exist. Think about that for awhile…

Give Hurts the ball at the end to win the SB and everybody expects he’ll get it done. Eagles fans…BG bragging to opponents about teams confidence in knowing Hurts like we do. Goodell totally hates us on top and he knows it. Even the #Hurtshaters know it’s true. FL and No Mas go ahead and try to talk about any doubt you had in Hurts when we got the ball back after Chiefs field goal at the end of that SB.

On 11/13/2025 at 10:49 PM, joemas6 said:

My actual biggest pet peeve that he does wrong. Makes no sense at this point in his career not to just flick the ball out of bounds and save the yards. But I'm a hater...lol

Ball security fumbling I felt he was to slack about. He’s improved that area now thankfully. That last fumble he wasn’t doing any of that…he tried to get down..but defender was under his knee..and perfect Peanut Punch by the other. Wasn’t him holding the ball all out dangerous or anything. Fine with those..they happen..other teams players make plays and get paid also.