2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Talking HC after the season

It's still a winning season????

2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Patullo been key figure to overcome with the passing game this entire time(not referring to just this season)

Fumbles, drops, off target passes, missing wide open guy and stupid penalties don't matter I guess LOL. We beat some pretty good teams already. While losing 2 in a row is never fun(we should have beaten the Bears except for stupid errors which were even worse at ATT) and everyone panics. Even if we lose in LA and to Buffalo we SHOULD win the other 3. That would put us at 11-6. Who's going to fire Siri for that Ham???? Patullo was not responsible for the overall passing game in previous seasons. Recheck your "facts". "Entire time" lol. He was here for the SB win????? You really need professional help for your agenda

Wuss doing well vs Denver

OT in DC

Oh man, terrific play call by the Wuss, dude was WIDE open for the 2 pt win, but BLOCKED by Bonitto. Excellent game

Just an observation. The running QB's seems to be falling off the path in favor of the passers. Even Lamar looks worse, Mahomes and Allen not taking off much. Defenses are figuring out how to keep the running QB's from running(aka containing) and while passing QB's can get a few rushing yards I'm not seeing any QB really winning games with his legs as the major contributor. Anyone else notice this? Maybe it's just me? Thoughts? Daniels could be an exception, but as a running QB he sends me the RG3 vibes as he is currently out. Risk/reward I suppose, but seems to me those rewards for running QB's are short lived

1 hour ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

It's still a winning season????

Still time…but we’ll have to agree to disagree.

1 hour ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Now we get to play AGAINST Becton LOL

Is he going to play? Maybe

16 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Just an observation. The running QB's seems to be falling off the path in favor of the passers. Even Lamar looks worse, Mahomes and Allen not taking off much. Defenses are figuring out how to keep the running QB's from running(aka containing) and while passing QB's can get a few rushing yards I'm not seeing any QB really winning games with his legs as the major contributor. Anyone else notice this? Maybe it's just me? Thoughts? Daniels could be an exception, but as a running QB he sends me the RG3 vibes as he is currently out. Risk/reward I suppose, but seems to me those rewards for running QB's are short lived

Number one seed in the NFC what did the QB just do to us

1 hour ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Fumbles, drops, off target passes, missing wide open guy and stupid penalties don't matter I guess LOL. We beat some pretty good teams already. While losing 2 in a row is never fun(we should have beaten the Bears except for stupid errors which were even worse at ATT) and everyone panics. Even if we lose in LA and to Buffalo we SHOULD win the other 3. That would put us at 11-6. Who's going to fire Siri for that Ham???? Patullo was not responsible for the overall passing game in previous seasons. Recheck your "facts". "Entire time" lol. He was here for the SB win????? You really need professional help for your agenda

Why should we win the rest?

I’d fire a coach that resided over two collapses.

Winning week one shouldn’t save a coach that things clearly go downhill on.

He either finally has things click and gets things rolling in the right direction…or fired!

58 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Still time…but we’ll have to agree to disagree.

We're going 0-5??? Is that your prediction???

53 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

coach that resided over two collapses.

Both were winning seasons? Are you some kind of Eagles board troll???? I want your prediction over the next 5 games. No BS no dodging give me the record over the next 5 games. You seem to be a "fair weather" fan since you were depressed the year of our SB win until we won the post season wuss game, then you believed. I won't even ask you to go week by week, since 1 week at a time doesn't matter to you,but give me the "big picture" over the last 5 games assuming our health stays right where it is

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Number one seed in the NFC what did the QB just do to us

Not much,he didn't make mistakes lots of errant throws. They got 281 yards on the ground, which doesn't hurt a QB much Were you absent that game?

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Why should we win the rest?

Why shouldn't we? Give me your 5 game prediction. Is this your 0-5 collapse prediction here?

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Still time…but we’ll have to agree to disagree.

The only way you can disagree, is making the case we go 0-5, so time to cough up your "called it" prediction. If you disagreed with me then I should make that assumption because even1 win puts us at .500 which is neither a winning nor losing season. 2/5 wins means it's a winning season, thus using the Hamityville math, would require you to commit to either going 0-5 or 1-4 (which is still not technically a win for either of us.), so let's hear it 0-5 or 1-4?

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I’d fire a coach that resided over two collapses.

Johnson and Patullo were only the OC 1 year each, so that is impossible mathmatically. Try again

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

He either finally has things click and gets things rolling in the right direction…or fired!

So doesn't matter if the players play to "click". The coaching staff will be on the field making plays?? Should be a fun game to watch, but if you wanted to go 0-5 that would be the way to do it. As long as Fangio doesn't fumble and Patullo has no picks I thing we have a shot. I'm putting Big Dom at RG, that should help and I'm going to bench the Gatorade crew if they get ONE MORE PENALTY!!! Siri will have to run crisper routes with no drops too. I have alot of confidence in Stoutland at CB2. I got this

Herbert fractured his hand and is having surgery. Raiders are trash. Commanders shouldn’t be a problem..twice. No reason we shouldn’t go 5-0 to finish. Anything less than 4-1 finish is unacceptable!

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Herbert fractured his hand and is having surgery. Raiders are trash. Commanders shouldn’t be a problem..twice. No reason we shouldn’t go 5-0 to finish. Anything less than 4-1 finish is unacceptable!

Really what’s important is Siri getting things figured out though. He’s been absolutely terrible this season. Five games left in the regular season for him to figure it out and prove his worth. Get this team on the right page looking like a legit contender to repeat.

1 hour ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So doesn't matter if the players play to "click". The coaching staff will be on the field making plays?? Should be a fun game to watch, but if you wanted to go 0-5 that would be the way to do it. As long as Fangio doesn't fumble and Patullo has no picks I thing we have a shot. I'm putting Big Dom at RG, that should help and I'm going to bench the Gatorade crew if they get ONE MORE PENALTY!!! Siri will have to run crisper routes with no drops too. I have alot of confidence in Stoutland at CB2. I got this

Sad how similar the confidence I have in things is to you describing our coaching staff playing. Things really are feeling that bleak.

2 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Why shouldn't we? Give me your 5 game prediction. Is this your 0-5 collapse prediction here?

Who cares about predicting at this point? I’ll be judging instead. Get it done…or don’t!

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Herbert fractured his hand and is having surgery. Raiders are trash. Commanders shouldn’t be a problem..twice. No reason we shouldn’t go 5-0 to finish. Anything less than 4-1 finish is unacceptable!

So it's another winning season,thanks

What I posted before,now this comes up https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/jalen-hurts-proves-he-s-indirectly-sabotaging-kevin-patullo-with-one-decision/ar-AA1RtWc6?ocid=winp2fptaskbarhover&cvid=692d82e0a40a43c9a681663d6bd9c2a3&ei=44

10 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So it's another winning season,thanks

Doesn’t work in my book to repeat, no thanks

49 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Doesn’t work in my book to repeat, no thanks

what?