12 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

And not trying to prove anything trying to win games that simple definition of insanity is trying the same thing over and over expecting different result.

We are not changing play callers this late in the year so if the O continues to struggle shake up the starters that includes hurts…. Why are you so scared of it is the real question

You only can think of tearing down our leader …when everybody knows our O is the worst

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

Why only one half? If McKee performs, he should stay in.

Well my original post stated going to McKee if we struggle at half time against Chargers making the swap similar to the 08 benching of Mcnabb against the ravens

O line, not there like last year. That means you have to/need to pass more. If you can't see the guys to pass to, throw weak passes behind the receivers, don't see wide open guys and carry the ball wrong, then that's the guy that is hurting the other 52(aka the franchise) No one wants to see Hurts fail, but he IS failing. No 2 ways about it. His stats are WAY down as are the receivers and Goederts. You can't make stupid mistakes and win games

8 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

screwing up the FRANCHISE HOW!!!!!!! What does it hurt you clown or can you not answer it because it doesn’t train or screw up anything it’s 1 half of play if the team is bad.

All I’ve done is answer this over and over for years…no version I haven’t answer this

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

You only can think of tearing down our leader …when everybody knows our O is the worst

It doesn’t tear down anything Mcnabb got benched and thrived after it has nothing to do with Hurts but the message it can send to the team is massive

12 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

No results LMFAO. winningest coach in franchise history-no results LMFAO. Just ridiculous

Weakest link to accomplish it

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You only can think of tearing down our leader …when everybody knows our O is the worst

Your agenda is ALL about Hurts and not the TEAM

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

All I’ve done is answer this over and over for years…no version I haven’t answer this

You haven’t answered it you said it ruins the franchise screws up the makeup of the team…. How does it do any of that???? How does playing McKee for 1 half if we struggle against the chargers just completely destroy this team?

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Weakest link to accomplish it

Ridiculous. I'm fine if they want to replace Patullo,but it's a little late to do that now

12 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Hurts lost the ball as another guy pulled it away.. this is common occurrence for a ball carrier to have a defender trying to get the ball out, ball security is the #1 goal.

I identified Hurts needed to improve ball security …feel he has.

Just now, Bleedinggreen93 said:

You haven’t answered it you said it ruins the franchise screws up the makeup of the team…. How does it do any of that???? How does playing McKee for 1 half if we struggle against the chargers just completely destroy this team?

McKee will let it fly,he has NP with that. He's not a runner and may not be able to do the tush push, but that is failing right now too

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

You haven’t answered it you said it ruins the franchise screws up the makeup of the team…. How does it do any of that???? How does playing McKee for 1 half if we struggle against the chargers just completely destroy this team?

Does nothing positive…except possibly building Tanner trade value.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I identified Hurts needed to improve ball security …feel he has.

LMAO, so blind it's scary

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Your agenda is ALL about Hurts and not the TEAM

Agenda needs to focus specific to our players…that’s our need

8 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Didn't AJ just have a huge game?

The loudest gear gets the grease

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Does nothing positive…except possibly building Tanner trade value.

How does it do nothing positive? Could very easily provide a spark this team needs just like in 08…. Also shows players they need to be accountable and execute no bigger way to send that then with the QB….But more importantly it doesn’t do anything negative either. Benching isn’t going to effect Hurts if anything it’s only going to drive him more

4 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Your agenda is ALL about Hurts and not the TEAM

Are you an Eagles fan or a Hurts fan? Pick one

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Does nothing positive…except possibly building Tanner trade value.

Or Hurts trade value

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Agenda needs to focus specific to our players…that’s our need

Our players need a QB who plays the position with skill and gets them the ball

2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

How does it do nothing positive? Could very easily provide a spark this team needs just like in 08…. Also shows players they need to be accountable and execute no bigger way to send that then with the QB….But more importantly it doesn’t do anything negative either. Benching isn’t going to effect Hurts if anything it’s only going to drive him more

Ham was right. Hurts got married and now he stinks

We need to add "and don't get married" clauses in every contract

Schedule is easier now. If we can't run up 31PPG then it's time for a "leadership" change IMO

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Schedule is easier now. If we can't run up 31PPG then it's time for a "leadership" change IMO

Hell I'll take 27 even(due to lack of O line)

13 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

It doesn’t tear down anything Mcnabb got benched and thrived after it has nothing to do with Hurts but the message it can send to the team is massive

Oh it should send the message to Hurts too.

13 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Does nothing positive…except possibly building Tanner trade value.

Why would it be nothing positive if the team has success? Why wouldn't that be positive?