"Hurts missed a wide-open DeVonta Smith in the first quarter that could have gone for a 26-yard touchdown on third down if he hadn't thrown the ball behind Smitty. There was another moment where Dallas Goedert was wide open in the end zone, and Hurts didn't hit him."

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

"Hurts missed a wide-open DeVonta Smith in the first quarter that could have gone for a 26-yard touchdown on third down if he hadn't thrown the ball behind Smitty. There was another moment where Dallas Goedert was wide open in the end zone, and Hurts didn't hit him."

Lack of field vision. End of story

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

"Hurts missed a wide-open DeVonta Smith in the first quarter that could have gone for a 26-yard touchdown on third down if he hadn't thrown the ball behind Smitty. There was another moment where Dallas Goedert was wide open in the end zone, and Hurts didn't hit him."

Bad play calls?

15 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Did you watch the game Friday?

I missed some due to emergency

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

I missed some due to emergency

Missed 2nd 1/4 and about 1/2 of the third

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Missed 2nd 1/4 and about 1/2 of the third

I was already unhappy with the run D lol

28 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I missed some due to emergency

When you watched....did you think to yourself..... " too many hitch routes " ?

https://www.mcall.com/2025/11/28/eagles-report-card-grading-the-birds-brutal-loss-to-the-bears/

11 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

When you watched....did you think to yourself..... " too many hitch routes " ?

From what I saw which is incomplete, no I can't say that, but I know we've been running those alot. With their beat up LB group Goedert should have shined

46 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Lack of field vision. End of story

It's an issue for sure. The receivers know. The whole team knows. But he is the golden boy. Prince of the city.

Ham is correct... if McKee went in and had success...that destroys the image and the whole " we have to hate Patullo " narrative.

It would be total disaster. What would the direction of the organization be at that point? Ham and the Hurts stans would have to root for failure from McKee and the offense.

This game vs the Bears...couldn't be more obvious that the QB was the main issue. This week..nothing to do with the OL play the previous weeks, the Superbowl, Barkley getting 2000 yards... specifically just this week, Hurts was the obvious biggest problem with the offense... but people are so swept up in agendas that they can't see it. " playcalling is the agenda for some... yet what else do you need from a play call than to have a wide open receiver? Yet still those people are in denial. MJK has this agenda, he has been quiet here, because he knows it wasn't the issue Friday. Ham will always be Ham... Hurts will never do anything wrong without someone else being mentioned. But anyone else with the Patullo agenda, saw it first hand Friday that he isn't the issue. That's why you don't hear from them now

It was convenient before...because it can't be the players right?? After all they won before, it has to be the new guy?? I mean ..." hitch routes " seriously???? Gasping at straws...denial to what the real issues are. I think Friday revealed that to the last of the people in denial, except Ham who will go down with the ship.

The play calling Friday was food enough to put up over 30 points...the proof is right there in the replays.

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

From what I saw which is incomplete, no I can't say that, but I know we've been running those alot. With their beat up LB group Goedert should have shined

So that statement for Friday was biased...you admit your own agenda or biased narrative without actually seeing something. This has been the fan issue with the Patullo narrative.

BTW the rerun is on NFLN Im going to watch it now

26 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

So that statement for Friday was biased...you admit your own agenda or biased narrative without actually seeing something. This has been the fan issue with the Patullo narrative.

I have no agenda LOL. Hitch routes are easy throws. They are safe with less risk, but you also forfeit YAC in many cases because there is no real out, unless the defender totally Whiffs on the tackle

Going to go watch and see what I missed

Just saw the throw behind Smitty in the 2nd. That was a TD if the throw was on

Jeremiyah Love the RB from ND is killin it. I was trying to watch my guy Malachi Fields at WR, but Love just ran amok through the Stanford D. But I stopped to watch the Eagles rerun

The second 1/4 D so far looks worse than the first, just HORRIBLE. Run D is non existent

Before the 1/2 our 2 min drill was 28 seconds(ugh)

The Bears used a simple formula to pick Vic Fangio’s defense apart. They alternated between horizontal runs off motion looks with their receivers and downhill carries with their running backs.

The Hitch is Smitty near unstoppable route…but it sets him up for double moves and deep also. AJ the Slant.

1 hour ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

BTW the rerun is on NFLN Im going to watch it now

Make sure you don't have any sharp objects in reach.

I'm with Sen,that was hard to watch, now On is the 1988 fog bowl LOL(aka the game no one saw)

https://www.nfl.com/news/raiders-decision-to-fire-oc-chip-kelly-underscored-lack-of-cohesion-in-building-under-hc-pete-carroll

2 hours ago, EaglesTD123 said:

Make sure you don't have any sharp objects in reach.

Just horrible. I harkened back to my HS days. It looked about the same . I don't(seriously) recall getting under 24 yards in any game. And I was nowhere near the offensive focal point. Just weird!!!

With the advent of on line betting the question in the back of my mind is are players/referees improper doing things to affect the outcome of games

or are there people on line who are losing money and looking for something to blame it on besides themselves

I'm still hoping for choice B