Two seed is the answer…gotta just believe!!!

Two Seed to Dynasty

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Two Seed to Dynasty

Say it all together …Two Seed to Dynasty…Two Seed to Dynasty!!!!

2 Seed 2 Dynasty

Is is conceivable the Eagles play their starters this week? Ugggg. Rather them be healthy than win a game that means very little. I hate the matchup vs the Rams though. Sure glad they won the Super Bowl last year as they don’t look capable this year.

6 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Opened up a PS spot

Actually the opposite is true, because it takes up a Practice Squad spot. To make room for Hughlet they needed to cut a current practice Squad player … and they did.

6 hours ago, capmaster24 said:

Hopefully for a guy to come in and play this meaningless game

That is my suspicion as well. A snaps eating player, who allows them to rest a key player.

6 hours ago, mattwill said:

Actually the opposite is true, because it takes up a Practice Squad spot. To make room for Hughlet they needed to cut a current practice Squad player … and they did.

That was the point I backed you up with

On 12/24/2025 at 5:59 PM, cunninghamtheman said:

Which game and when? This past game …the first one LS back from IR? Or the previous LS they axed not believing he was the guy?

the hills you are willing to die on are so f'ng weird.

i doesn't matter if it was lurie himself snapping the ball, the issue has been elliott, plain and simple. there's no further analysis needed. put your efforts into another silly hot take, this one's galactically dumb, even by your standards.

11 hours ago, Senhorcook said:

Is is conceivable the Eagles play their starters this week? Ugggg. Rather them be healthy than win a game that means very little. I hate the matchup vs the Rams though. Sure glad they won the Super Bowl last year as they don’t look capable this year.

Maybe 1 series would be my guess only so they can "start" then I would pull them all. I still expect our 2's to beat the Wuss. IDK if they will play starters or not. Doesn't really matter

55 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Maybe 1 series would be my guess only so they can "start" then I would pull them all. I still expect our 2's to beat the Wuss. IDK if they will play starters or not. Doesn't really matter

I don't think you understand the concept of a game day roster. Pre season you do that one series stuff because everyone can dress. If you dress the starters then it limits your game day roster. Why even dress them and take away the spots?

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

I don't think you understand the concept of a game day roster. Pre season you do that one series stuff because everyone can dress. If you dress the starters then it limits your game day roster. Why even dress them and take away the spots?

I have no clue what we will do

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I have no clue what we will do

The starters either play...or they don't dress at all

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Are you calling up every PS player?

Just like last year. They made this move for a guy i believe just eats up snaps. If you rest....you go all in on the rest...no half way

15 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Packers…. then Rams…..then go to Santa Clara

How does the math work there? I'm curious?

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

I believe you have to dress so many?(IDK if thee is a rule or not)

You have a limit of how many you can dress...that's why I'm saying you don't even dress the starters ... otherwise it limits the amount of backups that can dress

48 can dress, is there a minimum?

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I believe you have to dress so many?(IDK if thee is a rule or not)

48 dress for the game. 53 man roster with 17 on PS. You don't dress the starters so that you can dress the PS guys and the other backups. If you dress the 11 starters on offense, you then only have 37 left. If only playing one series, then you leave yourself shorthanded the rest of the game. You need bodies for special teams plays etc. The kicker, punter and LS take up 3 ...now down to 34. Why dress the starters at all?

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

48 can dress, is there a minimum?

Why would you dress less?

OK I thought maybe they got extra for "starting" but I was wrong

https://thetopplayers.com/how-do-nfl-players-get-paid/

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

48 dress for the game. 53 man roster with 17 on PS. You don't dress the starters so that you can dress the PS guys and the other backups. If you dress the 11 starters on offense, you then only have 37 left. If only playing one series, then you leave yourself shorthanded the rest of the game. You need bodies for special teams plays etc. The kicker, punter and LS take up 3 ...now down to 34. Why dress the starters at all?

Makes sense. See other post

5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

48 can dress, is there a minimum?

That is my point... you dress the PS guys instead of the starters to make your 48

2 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

That is my point... you dress the PS guys instead of the starters to make your 48

Then I sit them. I erroneously thought they got money for starting. I never played pro ball

4 hours ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

the hills you are willing to die on are so f'ng weird.

i doesn't matter if it was lurie himself snapping the ball, the issue has been elliott, plain and simple. there's no further analysis needed. put your efforts into another silly hot take, this one's galactically dumb, even by your standards.

Not really....this is the usual hill.