April 24, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, joemas6 said: How do you trade back for a player? You can't...you don't know if he will be there? Who trades back for a player? Exactly. Why there is no way I ever suggested trading back for just Reagor.
April 24, 20241 yr Just now, cunninghamtheman said: Exactly. Why there is no way I ever suggested trading back for just Reagor. Some how I’ve been accused of trading back for a specific player quite a few times on this board…some how. Just not even how I think.
April 24, 20241 yr 5 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said: Can break down cowboys as well for you 2022 under Moore- cowboys ran a total of 1275 play of which 285 were out of the 12 for a grand total of 22.4% 2023- 1090 play 166 in the 12 or 15.2% of there snaps See this makes more sense. They struggled some in 12 with the two TEs pass catching and Had Zeke with Pollard in 2022. Didn’t have the same rushing attack in 2023 for sure. Like you stated things do depend on personnel.
April 24, 20241 yr Everything I had seen give or take a couple just under 70% using 11 while just under 25% is using 12. I think it is pretty easy to see Moore leaning more on the 12 if given the right players to utilize it more while he is also shown he is fine running 11 as well. But as I stated at the start will come down to the players we give Moore
April 24, 20241 yr Also have to add the fact that the most heavy use 12 personnel team was the Falcons and that was just under 42% of the snaps no other team even cracked 40%
April 24, 20241 yr Just now, Bleedinggreen93 said: Everything I had seen give or take a couple just under 70% using 11 while just under 25% is using 12. I think it is pretty easy to see Moore leaning more on the 12 if given the right players to utilize it more while he is also shown he is fine running 11 as well. But as I stated at the start will come down to the players we give Moore He gets the players he wants. He chooses. Just like Fangio chooses. They both are in control of their sides of the ball directly communicating to Rosie.
April 24, 20241 yr Just now, cunninghamtheman said: He gets the players he wants. He chooses. Just like Fangio chooses. They both are in control of their sides of the ball directly communicating to Rosie. Is he though already reports that Siri might not be willing to give up as much freedom on that side of the ball as he first said
April 24, 20241 yr Don’t even know what Siri will do. Was hilarious he had a presser with Rosie and nobody asked Siri a question.
April 24, 20241 yr Author 2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said: Pretty much if you are fighting for our OC that prefers 3 WR sets to force running two TE sets Uneducated resposnse. I will ask again,how can you run a 2 TE set with 1 TE????
April 24, 20241 yr Author 1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said: Whole different O coming to town…be ready for that. Going to be tough on your boy running more than 2 pass plays
April 24, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Going to be tough on your boy running more than 2 pass plays Be most welcome to bring in an O that defensive don’t find completely predictable. Sure felt Hurts thrived much more under Steichen.
April 24, 20241 yr Author 2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said: Pretty much if you are fighting for our OC that prefers 3 WR sets to force running two TE sets I have 2 WR's so I'm going to run 3 WR sets,because you know I will just make that happen(this is stupidity regardless of your education. My 7 year old grand son would know better). What's uneducated is calling other people uneducated because this is hypocritical. So please tell me what me education level is and what degrees I hold. I'd like to hear this since you must know it
April 24, 20241 yr I’m not real high on Moore and Siri though. I’d rebuild more on the D side of things. Fangio I see as a much higher chance of remaining here for awhile.
April 24, 20241 yr Author 1 hour ago, joemas6 said: Dude....all everyone is saying is that they are physically built different... lol. Relax. I wasn't referring to their physicality,I was referring to how effective they are at the position which is all that matters yes?
April 24, 20241 yr Author 1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said: Chargers understood hiring Moore meant less conservative two TE sets Who were their TE's?
April 24, 20241 yr 5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: I have 2 WR's so I'm going to run 3 WR sets,because you know I will just make that happen(this is stupidity regardless of your education. My 7 year old grand son would know better). What's uneducated is calling other people uneducated because this is hypocritical. So please tell me what me education level is and what degrees I hold. I'd like to hear this since you must know it Don’t even remember calling you uneducated. What did I say again you’re referring to?
April 24, 20241 yr Author 52 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: 2022 Chargers had 1240 snaps in 12 personnel 2023 Chargers had 1060 snaps in 12 personnel IDK I didn't look it up,who were their TE's in said years?
April 24, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said: IDK I didn't look it up,who were their TE's in said years? Think I maybe wasn’t using the website correctly for these figures. So I’d ignore this post. I probably was wrong on these numbers.
April 24, 20241 yr Author 30 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said: Also have to add the fact that the most heavy use 12 personnel team was the Falcons and that was just under 42% of the snaps no other team even cracked 40% Well they did draft Pitts high,so it would be no surprise they tried to utilize him
April 24, 20241 yr But doesn’t change the perception surrounding Moore. I’ll admit and acknowledge BG possibly made good points on this subject about Moore utilizing 12 personnel.
April 24, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Well they did draft Pitts high,so it would be no surprise they tried to utilize him What a waste of such talent
April 24, 20241 yr Author Just now, cunninghamtheman said: Think I maybe wasn’t using the website correctly for these figures. So I’d ignore this post. I probably was wrong on these numbers. Well,.IDK hard to know. Maybe they lost or traded a TE. I don't follow every team from year to year. Maybe they added a decent RB or a top WR so they ran more or went with 3 sets more. All this stuff varies by year and who the additions or subtractions were and whatever coaching changes were made
April 24, 20241 yr 44 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Exactly. Why there is no way I ever suggested trading back for just Reagor. Completely false news repeated over..and over…and over..and over again by one certain poster here.
April 24, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Well,.IDK hard to know. Maybe they lost or traded a TE. I don't follow every team from year to year. Maybe they added a decent RB or a top WR so they ran more or went with 3 sets more. All this stuff varies by year and who the additions or subtractions were and whatever coaching changes were made This is a valid point
Create an account or sign in to comment