June 3, 20242 yr Author https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/walter-wetzel-redskins-logo/ So other indians were offended by other indians who made that logo possible
June 3, 20242 yr Author 7 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: You do realize he’s 25 years old…the same age as Hurts…the guy you thrash every chance you get. Where did I trash(or thrash) Hurts? Because I point out his weak points like others on here???. At the same age was Hurts tossed into the fire????
June 3, 20242 yr Author 5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/walter-wetzel-redskins-logo/ So other indians were offended by other indians who made that logo possible Wetzel shared photos of Native American leaders with the team's top executives, and successfully persuaded them to use them as inspiration for a new design on players' helmets.
June 3, 20242 yr Author 2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Wetzel shared photos of Native American leaders with the team's top executives, and successfully persuaded them to use them as inspiration for a new design on players' helmets. And the song "Hail to the Redskins" also sounds "offensive"?
June 3, 20242 yr 1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said: And the song "Hail to the Redskins" also sounds "offensive"? Yes…very much so. What if you started singing Hail to the Yellow Skins to the Chinese? It’s flat out offensive.
June 3, 20242 yr The name Indians wasn’t offensive…it was ignorant. Chief Wahoo, their mascot, was very offensive.
June 3, 20242 yr Author Not the "Tribe" was not the same,that was not approved by the indian nation,in fact the previous logos were MUCH worse for them. At any rate the WUSS NFL will kiss Brazillian arse for free "Brazillian butt lifts"
June 3, 20242 yr Author 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: Yes…very much so. What if you started singing Hail to the Yellow Skins to the Chinese? It’s flat out offensive. Yes "HAIL TO" seems SOOOOOO offensive
June 3, 20242 yr 1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Yes "HAIL TO" seems SOOOOOO offensive How about Hail to the Crackers? Would that offend you? But it says "Hail to”
June 3, 20242 yr Author 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: The name Indians wasn’t offensive…it was ignorant. Chief Wahoo, their mascot, was very offensive. But was fine for DECADES. Just this BS WOKE crap came into existence. Like I said they wanted Green Bay to change the Packers name and they told them to KMA. Why isn't KC changing their name and logo??? because they are not pu**ies. may as well scrap Indian Guides,that';s offensive also.I guess if someone gets offended by BIRDS they will ask us to change out name
June 3, 20242 yr Author 2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Florida State Seminoles…not offensive. Why not?
June 3, 20242 yr Author 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: How about Hail to the Crackers? Would that offend you? But it says "Hail to” No,I am not a little girl that gets butt hurt.
June 3, 20242 yr 1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said: But was fine for DECADES. Just this BS WOKE crap came into existence. Like I said they wanted Green Bay to change the Packers name and they told them to KMA. Why isn't KC changing their name and logo??? because they are not pu**ies. may as well scrap Indian Guides,that';s offensive also.I guess if someone gets offended by BIRDS they will ask us to change out name Why did they want the Packers make changed? What’s offensive about Chiefs? Nothing but pride in Chiefs. Packers wouldn’t seem offensive unless you put Fudge in front of it.
June 3, 20242 yr Just now, GreenbleedinNC said: Has a simlar indian logo Nothing offensive about a Native American logo. Its the very obvious naming after calling a whole people labeled by skin color that’s offensive.
June 3, 20242 yr Author 2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: What’s offensive about Chiefs? What's offensive about a chiefs HEAD that Washington used for DECADES
June 3, 20242 yr Author 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: Nothing offensive about a Native American logo. Its the very obvious naming after calling a whole people labeled by skin color that’s offensive. Yeah to 5 people in the tribe
June 3, 20242 yr Just now, GreenbleedinNC said: What's offensive about a chiefs HEAD that Washington used for DECADES Nothing offensive about their logo.
June 3, 20242 yr Author Just now, cunninghamtheman said: Cleveland Indians logo was frankly offensive Was fine for DECADES. But now we have to cater to everyone with an opinion
June 3, 20242 yr 2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Was fine for DECADES. But now we have to cater to everyone with an opinion We allow women to go to school, vote, hold office and work now. No longer keep slaves. It’s a whole new world.
June 3, 20242 yr Author Just now, cunninghamtheman said: Nothing offensive about their logo. So keep the logo and change the name to the blackfeet. Just petty BS. We have to cave to the few or they riot and tear up your yard and paint slurs on your house(like that is better and a solution)
June 3, 20242 yr Author 4 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: We allow women to go to school, vote, hold office and work now. No longer keep slaves. It’s a whole new world. Nothing to do with this,try to stay on topic. Women parade down the street dressed as vajaja's and I find THAT offensive. But they have that right,just like sports teams have the right to name themselves what they want. If you don't like it DON'T go to their games. Maybe other people LIKE the name. Obviously the execs did and fans paid alot of money for jerseys. Why should they cave to some basement keyboard warrior?
Create an account or sign in to comment