4 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

What impressed you about the 10-1? Other than the fact Hurts kept squeezing out wins against all odds every week

We were favored almost every game the first 11???? We had to eek out wins against not so good teams? We lost to the 4 win Cards??? Hurts couldn't squeeze out a win? I bet you Mahomes could have

10 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So what changed after going 10-1????? Did we lose both WR's? Were all our RB's out? Every team deals with injuries. Nobody forced Hurts to take a JV sack in the EZ, just morbidly STUPID play by Hurts. No moronic plays like that will beat the 9ers let alone the Bucs. You need coherent QB play and that was lacking. We won alot of close games that we should have been blowouts,but we won because we had the talent DESPITE Hurts poor play

Obviously didn’t have enough talent to blow anybody out all season

1 hour ago, Senhorcook said:

How do I know he will be cheap. Because the Broncos HAVE to pay him $30 million….it’s guaranteed. So Eagles could agree to pay him league minimum. Broncos are on the hook for ALL the rest. Thats how I know he will be cheap.

It was more of a joke anyway. He won’t accept a backup role. But Hurts better improve and quickly or the Eagles will be looking for a new starter soon.

Brissett is not a runner and NOT that mobile. Decent QB but not taking any team very far.

He's not playing for league minimum. Brissett can run,he just chooses to PASS first,which is what Hurts SHOULD DO. I agree,Hurts went back to 1 read and run(and he didn't do that well either) 

43 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LOL right we pick at 50,no one will take him before us? No one will go at 33-49? Therefore if you want him you'd have to spend the 22 pick. Not hard to understand

Now you are the all knowing wizard that knows exactly how everybody will come off every draft board?

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Obviously didn’t have enough talent to blow anybody out all season

Nope,not with Hurts falling down like a little girl,running OOB for 1 yard,taking JV sacks in the EZ. We need proficient QB play and we didn't get it from the 255 million dollar QB

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Now you are the all knowing wizard that knows exactly how everybody will come off every draft board?

If he's as good as you keep saying then why would be last until pick 50? Why would you assume he would be around? You are the wizard who knows??? My guess is as good as yours. he wold need to go between 50-62? With 18 picks prior to ours(without trades) the other 31 teams don't see his rise? Only you and only the Eagles?

38 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Right,you take the 2 back backfield,we have always done it. When have we had a 3 down back in recent memory???? We've always had a tandem and/or stable of multiple backs. You just don't follow the teams history. When you rely(as I keep stating) on one back and he goes down,you have no answers for your running game. How bad were the gnats when Barkley went down?? Howie prefers to spend his money on the lines, why we have pro bowl linemen???? If you have a good O line any RB will put up the numbers. You only need a stud back when your O line is trash. Pick one way or the other because you can;t afford both. Obviously this team picks option 1,a good O line

 

14 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So what changed after going 10-1????? Did we lose both WR's? Were all our RB's out? Every team deals with injuries. Nobody forced Hurts to take a JV sack in the EZ, just morbidly STUPID play by Hurts. No moronic plays like that will beat the 9ers let alone the Bucs. You need coherent QB play and that was lacking. We won alot of close games that we should have been blowouts,but we won because we had the talent DESPITE Hurts poor play

You over obsess about investing in the Oline. But then ignore them not doing there job to blame the QB always. You can’t invest always in the Oline then not block well. 

5 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Obviously didn’t have enough talent to blow anybody out all season

Because of weak QB play. Put Mahomes behind center and watch us FLY

47 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LOL right we pick at 50,no one will take him before us? No one will go at 33-49? Therefore if you want him you'd have to spend the 22 pick. Not hard to understand

He’s been listed as late day three so far. But now you insist he’ll be off the board by 23?

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

 

You over obsess about investing in the Oline. But then ignore them not doing there job to blame the QB always. You can’t invest always in the Oline then not block well. 

I don't obsess about it HOWIE does

42 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Right,you take the 2 back backfield,we have always done it. When have we had a 3 down back in recent memory???? We've always had a tandem and/or stable of multiple backs. You just don't follow the teams history. When you rely(as I keep stating) on one back and he goes down,you have no answers for your running game. How bad were the gnats when Barkley went down?? Howie prefers to spend his money on the lines, why we have pro bowl linemen???? If you have a good O line any RB will put up the numbers. You only need a stud back when your O line is trash. Pick one way or the other because you can;t afford both. Obviously this team picks option 1,a good O line

Really don’t believe we have always done it at all…the two headed monster backfield.

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

He’s been listed as late day three so far. But now you insist he’ll be off the board by 23?

LMAO we have picks 22 and 50. If you don't think he lasts until 50 what do you do???????

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Really don’t believe we have always done it at all…the two headed monster backfield.

And no 3 down backs????? 

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LMAO we have picks 22 and 50. If you don't think he lasts until 50 what do you do???????

Hint,if you want him you have to use pick 22,not rocket science here

30 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LMAO, so you're willing to pay players YOU want,but any Howie chooses you aren't willing to pay. As I said before,if you recognize all these players put your app ion at Novacare. And you also assume all these players you want are just begging to play for us.So if Azeez is on the rise,you are the only one who knows that? The other 31 teams are just clueless? The guys agent doesn't now his client is on the rise? And besides 31 other teams seeing this,there are 52 other spots to fill,yet you think you know exactly what to do when,but you always want guys "cheap". Well you can dream all you want. That being said,I still would like Luvu from Carolina. He is young. is he on the rise? I think so,but I sign him for his play NOW. Maybe he gets better,maybe this is his ceiling. You can only go by the here and now and why Howie is hard to get a long term contract out of. Most times he will do a 1 year,that way you aren't risking signing a player long term at his ASSUMED high,only to get stuck after a year with a player in decline. Rookie contracts are 4 years(or 5). If that player is "on the rise",teams have a chopice to make,Pay the man or let him walk because you don't have the money OR you think he has peaked. There is no way to see the future,but you claim you can. If you can do better than Howie,by all means go take his job away 

I wanted Queen. But then he had a mister season. So now he’s blown his value out the roof. So I adapt. Find the next up and coming stud. Azeez. He was cheap so far. But he proved himself now. So he’s upped his value. But one strong year won’t get him the 20 mil like Queen. He probably will fetch 10 mil now. This is how to work things like a good GM. Sign the guys rising. Not so much the guys you gotta pay at their peak price.

But yeah…I never liked Rosie signing Morrow or Jack. Need to sign a quality player for the second level of the D. 

Dean cheap on rookie contract. Cunningham cheap on being a good fit for us but nothing special. So spend something on one quality player to lead that area. Basic.

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

I wanted Queen. But then he had a mister season. So now he’s blown his value out the roof. So I adapt. Find the next up and coming stud. Azeez. He was cheap so far. But he proved himself now. So he’s upped his value. But one strong year won’t get him the 20 mil like Queen. He probably will fetch 10 mil now. This is how to work things like a good GM. Sign the guys rising. Not so much the guys you gotta pay at their peak price.

And the other 31 teams don't see that? Just you? Amazing stuff. I will take Luvu. I will take him at the way he played this year. Maybe he gets even better,maybe he reached his ceiling,but I will take that without dreaming he will become a STUD,in which case he will price himself out of the Eagles organization. Hurts was so bad after the big money he should give some of it back

4 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Hint,if you want him you have to use pick 22,not rocket science here

Hes consensus being ranked 52 right now. So thinking can use pick 22 elsewhere or trade back big time instead of taking a 52 ranked guy at 22.

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

And the other 31 teams don't see that? Just you? Amazing stuff. I will take Luvu. I will take him at the way he played this year. Maybe he gets even better,maybe he reached his ceiling,but I will take that without dreaming he will become a STUD,in which case he will price himself out of the Eagles organization. Hurts was so bad after the big money he should give some of it back

Not sure who sees what. Some teams can’t afford to bring in another LB. Some he maybe scheme wise isn’t ideal. But yep…exactly the name of the game is to see the up and coming young players that can be brought in for good value.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

But yeah…I never liked Rosie signing Morrow or Jack. Need to sign a quality player for the second level of the D. 

We know Howie avoids the back 7.It's his history and no reason to change that unless HE changes it. I can't change how Howie works,I can only identify it. Now this draftm has alot of good players at those spots. Still I see no way Howie uses a 1 pick. So I am happy you identified a round 2 pick(as I did in TJ Tampa and Trotter).Now the question is will Howie pull the trigger? I am doubtful

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

And the other 31 teams don't see that? Just you? Amazing stuff. I will take Luvu. I will take him at the way he played this year. Maybe he gets even better,maybe he reached his ceiling,but I will take that without dreaming he will become a STUD,in which case he will price himself out of the Eagles organization. Hurts was so bad after the big money he should give some of it back

So bad he set the all time franchise record.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Hes consensus being ranked 52 right now. So thinking can use pick 22 elsewhere or trade back big time instead of taking a 52 ranked guy at 22.

Well we were talking without trades. Sure we can move all over. And probably will,but we have no facts to show where we will move. other teams can move too,not just us

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

We know Howie avoids the back 7.It's his history and no reason to change that unless HE changes it. I can't change how Howie works,I can only identify it. Now this draftm has alot of good players at those spots. Still I see no way Howie uses a 1 pick. So I am happy you identified a round 2 pick(as I did in TJ Tampa and Trotter).Now the question is will Howie pull the trigger? I am doubtful

I can’t just accept bad ideas and neglect by our GM as being ‘the way.’ It’s not.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

So bad he set the all time franchise record.

Amazing because our scoring went DOWN,which again proves Hurts is a BALL HOG. Just ADMIT IT