I get that the Giants offense is bad, BUT this was their worst offensive performance of the season. 

4 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:

10/14 114yds 1TD passing

7 carries 22yds 2TDs rushing (including tush push TD)

That's an embarrassing stat line for a $50M QB when both rushing TDs were sneaks

Just now, RLC said:

I get that the Giants offense is bad, BUT this was their worst offensive performance of the season. 

Yep.   They are bad.  Today they were way worse!   That's a great sign.    Like I said... it was less about the Giants making mistakes and more about the Eagles making plays.

I wish the lions had made it to the sb after SF's terrible offensive performance and shanahan's pu$$y play calling

The 2006 Colts are the last team to be the last undefeated and win the superbowl 

Just now, devpool said:

That's an embarrassing stat line for a $50M QB when both rushing TDs were sneaks

And they had to bring in the RB that they were putting on ice to help push his ass over the goal line.

Best win of the season by far. Still not feeling remotely good about this offense. Hurts is a problem. Defense looks to be improving though.

1 minute ago, RLC said:

I get that the Giants offense is bad, BUT this was their worst offensive performance of the season. 

They were missing their LT today, not sure if this was his first game out or not I didn't catch it during the game

1 minute ago, devpool said:

That's an embarrassing stat line for a $50M QB when both rushing TDs were sneaks

No turnovers though

He held the ball way too long

Also Nick was risky as hell against a really bad Giants team. Bunch of times going for it on 4th. Though I'm betting that 4th down to Brown was another play Brown and Hurts just came up with

2 minutes ago, devpool said:

That's an embarrassing stat line for a $50M QB when both rushing TDs were sneaks

Not really, Giants couldnt stop the run so eagles ran the ball a lot.

Hurts had zero turnovers high completion% I mean would you rather he threw for 500 yards in a loss?  

They’re 4-2 with an offense that no-shows in the first quarter and a QB who can throw one route. And you can make the argument that they should be 5-1. Just wild. 

 

1 minute ago, Utebird said:

Not really, Giants couldnt stop the run so eagles ran the ball a lot.

Hurts had zero turnovers high completion% I mean would you rather he threw for 500 yards in a loss?  

Why bother? Hurst could go 30/30, 500 yds, 7 TDs and he would be labeled a showboat and ball hog by some. 

Texting with a buddy of mine—I thought I’d be a nice friend and remind him of what he said before the season started.

Wow, Vikings really lost that.  Remember the 2016 Vikings with Sam Bradford, they went 5-0, had a bye and lost the game coming off of it, finished the season 8-8. This Vikings team is pretty good but that Division is crazy, everyone has 2 loses or less.  This GMen was our best and most complete win but the Greenbay win is looking even better, they are playing well too.  The ATL Loss hurts even more the further we get away from it.   They really should be 5-1 again.   

Eagles are sitting where they need to be to be a factor moving forward.   4-2.   We really couldn't ask for much more than that from a record standpoint.

 

The defense might be rounding into shape, which is something we mostly could have anticipated... a slow start for the defense.   And the young players might just get better.  There's some hope on that side of the ball.   The more discouraging part for the early part of the season has been the offense's inconsistency and sleep walking through the beginning of games.   IF the coaches see that this is a running team first and lean on it... this team could be a problem for other teams moving forward. 

 

 

Meanwhile, the best thing that could have happened for the Browns might have happened.  Watson snapped his Achilles.  Their season might be saved!  I don't know if this gives them an out from that contract with an injury settlement... but it might.  Either way, it might just get him away from the team and out of the spotlight.

watson hurts achilles 

2 minutes ago, Know Life said:

Texting with a buddy of mine—I thought I’d be a nice friend and remind him of what he said before the season started.

Tell him to cope harder lmfao over 100 scrimmage yards in every game besides last week

2 minutes ago, Know Life said:

Texting with a buddy of mine—I thought I’d be a nice friend and remind him of what he said before the season started.

First good game since the first?     Does he watch the games?

Six games in I’ll happily eat some crow.  I was underwhelmed with the Barkley signing.  He’s been excellent; along with AJ Brown they’re the best two players on the roster at this point.

4 minutes ago, Next_Up said:

Why bother? Hurst could go 30/30, 500 yds, 7 TDs and he would be labeled a showboat and ball hog by some. 

Are those total stats?

4 minutes ago, KINGnabb said:

Wow, Vikings really lost that.  Remember the 2016 Vikings with Sam Bradford, they went 5-0, had a bye and lost the game coming off of it, finished the season 8-8. This Vikings team is pretty good but that Division is crazy, everyone has 2 loses or less.  This GMen was our best and most complete win but the Greenbay win is looking even better, they are playing well too.  The ATL Loss hurts even more the further we get away from it.   They really should be 5-1 again.   

Vikes were lucky to get that lead at all. Late 4th quarter fumble recovery and return gave them the lead back after being down 2 scores for most of the game.

2 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

Eagles are sitting where they need to be to be a factor moving forward.   4-2.   We really couldn't ask for much more than that from a record standpoint.

 

The defense might be rounding into shape, which is something we mostly could have anticipated... a slow start for the defense.   And the young players might just get better.  There's some hope on that side of the ball.   The more discouraging part for the early part of the season has been the offense's inconsistency and sleep walking through the beginning of games.   IF the coaches see that this is a running team first and lean on it... this team could be a problem for other teams moving forward. 

 

 

Meanwhile, the best thing that could have happened for the Browns might have happened.  Watson snapped his Achilles.  Their season might be saved!  I don't know if this gives them an out from that contract with an injury settlement... but it might.  Either way, it might just get him away from the team and out of the spotlight.

If they move to a run first team (like they should) they're going to need a second RB. Whether that's Shipley remains to be seen, but it isn't gainwell despite his good game today.

2017 had Ajayi and Blount, Barkley is better than both but gainwell is far worse than both and Shipley is a question mark

11 minutes ago, Next_Up said:

Why bother? Hurst could go 30/30, 500 yds, 7 TDs and he would be labeled a showboat and ball hog by some. 

Yup the reactions on here are not surprisingly idiotic 

Hurts goes 10-14 tosses a td no turnovers while the running game goes for over 200 and a win and  Hurts haters on here are calling hurts a problem.🤷‍♂️

Dude passed the ball 14 times missed 3 of them exactly what was so horrible about those 3 incompletions that one would feel the need to complain about hurts? 

 

Just now, devpool said:

If they move to a run first team (like they should) they're going to need a second RB. Whether that's Shipley remains to be seen, but it isn't gainwell despite his good game today.

2017 had Ajayi and Blount, Barkley is better than both but gainwell is far worse than both and Shipley is a question mark

I'm not sure they really do need a 2nd RB.  Barkley can be Derrick Henry.  He can be that workhorse, but they won't lean on him that much.