March 27Mar 27 1 hour ago, vikas83 said: Well, we don’t have any inspectors general because Trump fired them all. Gee, I wonder why he would just fire all inspector generals that would audit his administration… "The Deep State is strong with this one”
March 27Mar 27 9 hours ago, Diehardfan said: I'm sure many will jump all over me for saying this, but my biggest issue with all this isn't what was said, it's who let them in (Waltz) and who continued to talk about things without noticing someone else was in the room (Pete). You can all argue whether it was classified, sensitive, or war plans/attack plans. My issue is that it was at least close enough to the line that we are having these conversations, and they didn't realize who was in the room. That's why I said Waltz needs to go, and Pete should probably resign when he gets back. Granted, I don't know anyone's number anymore so if I had to call a family member without their contact info I'd be screwed since everything is programmed into my phone, but I'd hope that someone would be paying attention to who has access and who is actually in the room. I actually want to applaud you for not being completely sucked into the cult that some people are. You’ve made some sensible statements about "Signalgate” and are calling for the firing of Waltz and to a degree Hegseth (I believe he deserves to be fired just like Waltz, but a resignation would do also). You also admit that MTG needs to go and shouldn’t be there in the first place, at least I interpreted that way?! So even though we have had our disagreements with the handling of Ukraine etc. and also see Trump in a different light, I just wanted to say that not all hope is lost that you may see things differently when the time comes. ✌️
March 27Mar 27 There is traction on this item and while not a loud chorus there are a smattering of conservative voices out there who are publicly upset and want investigations and even some blood. On the inside it seems like Trump was most upset with the fact that Waltz had Goldberg in his contact list. That's hardly the main issue here but I think the Dems should lean into that one and just belittle the sheet out of Waltz. Play Trump's game with this one. Come up with a trolling nickname for him and blast it everywhere.
March 27Mar 27 @DiPros Have you actually watched TG's testimony? Watch that and then tell me what you think. Unless she is some secret super duper double agent mole then she's 100% gone to the dark orange side. She sold her soul and they own her now.
March 27Mar 27 5 minutes ago, DrPhilly said: There is traction on this item and while not a loud chorus there are a smattering of conservative voices out there who are publicly upset and want investigations and even some blood. On the inside it seems like Trump was most upset with the fact that Waltz had Goldberg in his contact list. That's hardly the main issue here but I think the Dems should lean into that one and just belittle the sheet out of Waltz. Play Trump's game with this one. Come up with a trolling nickname for him and blast it everywhere. You know what, this type of incompetence and disregard for OUR national security should never be a partisan thing. I could care less which party or president is in charge. This type of stuff can actually get our soldiers, our CIA operatives etc. or ally personnel killed! It’s an outrageous act the more I think about it. Being in a leadership role you are supposed to lead by example. What type of example are these clowns setting for the military etc.? I would say the same thing if the Dems were in charge.(yes, Clinton shouldn’t have had the emails either). It’s a problem I see with a lot of people in charge. They lay out the rules and laws to their subordinates and threaten them with repercussions, but then they break the guidelines themselves. It happens on both sides of the aisle. It sets a very bad example if nothing happens to some of the people involved in this scandal. This is just not defendable at any level.
March 27Mar 27 4 minutes ago, Frankfurteagle89 said: You know what, this type of incompetence and disregard for OUR national security should never be a partisan thing. I could care less which party or president is in charge. This type of stuff can actually get our soldiers, our CIA operatives etc. or ally personnel killed! It’s an outrageous act the more I think about it. Being in a leadership role you are supposed to lead by example. What type of example are these clowns setting for the military etc.? I would say the same thing if the Dems were in charge.(yes, Clinton shouldn’t have had the emails either). It’s a problem I see with a lot of people in charge. They lay out the rules and laws to their subordinates and threaten them with repercussions, but then they break the guidelines themselves. It happens on both sides of the aisle. It sets a very bad example if nothing happens to some of the people involved in this scandal. This is just not defendable at any level. 100% - If nothing else, it sets a horrible precedent for leadership (the lack thereof) of our military and intelligence communities. Five Eyes is no doubt a complete disaster right now.
March 27Mar 27 16 hours ago, DrPhilly said: They continue to double down and say "no classified information". Just now by Leavitt in a WH presser who says she has just spoken with Trump. Even a large number of MAGTards know that is a blatant lie. Of course, thereafter she goes directly into an attack on Goldberg and The Atlantic. She uses the term "Signal hoax" and insinuate that it is all just fake news. Please chip in here and help me out by defending the WH position so I can understand it @The_Omega @Procus @The Norseman @Procus Let's try this one again and now adding @Diehardfan Please explain the basic WH position to me. Everyone and their mother knows that classified info was included in that Signal chat. Well, I do have an FB friend that doesn't understand but he is legally retarded (yes, I'll use that word, he's was in the special ed classes, you know those that are being shutdown now). @The_Omega @The Norseman @Procus
March 27Mar 27 5 hours ago, vikas83 said: Well, we don’t have any inspectors general because Trump fired them all. Yeah, well, time to hire a couple back like so many others DOGE has chopped
March 27Mar 27 8 hours ago, jsdarkstar said: Dementia Donnie needs a nursing home. But I choose to believe he just doesn't care about it. So what. It's not about me. He knew within the hour that his painting in CO was goofy but no idea that soliders have died.
March 27Mar 27 8 hours ago, Mike030270 said: Not trump But not Kamala, right? Well buddy, that's how Trump won. Because people like you convinced themselves Kamala wasn't the right option.
March 27Mar 27 TBH this explains exactly how we got here. MAGA Trump worship is, as based on pure science, the largest collection of low IQ individuals in all of history.
March 27Mar 27 4 hours ago, DrPhilly said: @DiPros Have you actually watched TG's testimony? Watch that and then tell me what you think. Unless she is some secret super duper double agent mole then she's 100% gone to the dark orange side. She sold her soul and they own her now. I did see most of both days of hearings. Was day drinking yesterday after burying a friend. Was just trying to figure that someone from the orange side needs to break away and do the right thing. Today, back in my right mind, I know it probably won't be her. An Admiral, somebody? Anybody? I see we had 1 Rep. speak up. This is serious and shouldn't be allowed to just go away. Really not liking SoD. He's the worst!
March 27Mar 27 40 minutes ago, DiPros said: I did see most of both days of hearings. Was day drinking yesterday after burying a friend. Was just trying to figure that someone from the orange side needs to break away and do the right thing. Today, back in my right mind, I know it probably won't be her. An Admiral, somebody? Anybody? I see we had 1 Rep. speak up. This is serious and shouldn't be allowed to just go away. Really not liking SoD. He's the worst! Sorry to hear you lost a friend.
March 27Mar 27 2 hours ago, Paul852 said: But not Kamala, right? Well buddy, that's how Trump won. Because people like you convinced themselves Kamala wasn't the right option. 2 hours ago, we_gotta_believe said: But not Harris either, right? I live in a county that's been red since before maga took over but do tell me how my vote would have changed the election
March 27Mar 27 14 minutes ago, Mike030270 said: I live in a county that's been red since before maga took over but do tell me how my vote would have changed the election She wasn't qualified, amirite?
March 27Mar 27 What's clear to me is no matter what Maga does, Maga in congress will not hold them responsible. Heggeseth could hold a news conference and state that he just sold Russia and China our plans for the new F-47 and gave them the secret location of S4 at Groom Lake along with the nuclear launch codes. Maga would say no big deal. Nothing classified was given to them. The reporter made it up, it's a Hoax. Not much to see here.
March 27Mar 27 19 minutes ago, Mike030270 said: I live in a county that's been red since before maga took over but do tell me how my vote would have changed the election Dont worry, there were people just like you in swing states too.
March 27Mar 27 18 minutes ago, Mike030270 said: and the cucks will parrot this stupid like it's gospel.
Create an account or sign in to comment