58 minutes ago, MF POON said:

Wonder how the Hurts haters will spin that 😄

Because Stafford plays poorly in a game, it's ok for Hurts to play poorly? That the logic you're going with?

I wouldn’t kick a field goal here.

16 minutes ago, Bwestbrook36 said:

Looks like Drake with downs

I had to try so hard to not laugh out loud and wake everyone up you a-hole 

That’s a bad flag by the rams 

19 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Yea comparing picture to picture you see it. Just scrolling through I had no idea though.

Eagles likely 1 and done.  NFC playoffs starting to look really tough.

Niners are garbage

Thanks for participating San Fran 

1 minute ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Thanks for participating San Fran 

Probably gonna need the bills and Vikings to beat the lions to have a shot at the 1 seed. 

5 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Thanks for participating San Fran 

Superbowl hangover is real, for the most part.

And we crushed em in their building. 

7 minutes ago, 315Eagles said:

Superbowl hangover is real, for the most part.

Yea. Kinda hard to understand why unless it’s purely psychological. 

1 minute ago, RLC said:

And we crushed em in their building. 

Our building 

 

5 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Yea. Kinda hard to understand why unless it’s purely psychological. 

I think it's just really hard to make deep playoff runs in back to back years in a league with so much parity. What the Bills did in the 90's was remarkable and overshadowed by the 4 losses in the big game, but they still were a damn good team.

No locker room is impervious to drama. If you win things go great, if you lose, they don't.

Twice in the last few weeks, we’re hearing of players refusing to go into games. Not saying it’s never happened before, but it’s the first I can ever recall hearing about players refusing to go in. 

2 minutes ago, EagleJoe8 said:

Twice in the last few weeks, we’re hearing of players refusing to go into games. Not saying it’s never happened before, but it’s the first I can ever recall hearing about players refusing to go in. 

Yeah, like how does that go?

"Go in."  "Nah, I'm good."  "Dfq?"

20 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Yea. Kinda hard to understand why unless it’s purely psychological. 

I'd think you probably lose a number of players to other teams and sometimes coaches.  The Eagles lost both coordinators and I believe 5 or 6 starters from the defense.  SF has had a ton of injuries.  Not sure how many players they lost from last year.

Regardless, I'm glad they suck.  

Neither offense looked good today. Surprised how poor Rams looked tbh

13 hours ago, MF POON said:

It's efficient because they consistently put up points and move the ball downfield with a heavy run game.  It's not always super exciting/explosive, but it's efficient.  I actually like it too because those longer drives gives our defense some rest when they need it. It helps to allow them to play at a high level.  

That is wishful thinking … that ignores the many inefficient three and out drives.

52 minutes ago, EagleJoe8 said:

Twice in the last few weeks, we’re hearing of players refusing to go into games. Not saying it’s never happened before, but it’s the first I can ever recall hearing about players refusing to go in.

Closest thing I can think of is Antonio Brown. But...that was also Antonio Brown. 

13 hours ago, jsb235 said:

Yards per game, time of possession, turnovers. 

Yards per game says how prolific an Offense has been, but not how efficient it has been.  Turnovers is indeed a measurement of efficiency, but the Eagles turnover net is in a bunch of 16 teams that make up the " middle of the pack”  To be in the leaders group they would need 6 more net turnovers.  For the season TOP has been good, but over the most recent three games they are in the bottom half on TOP.  That isn’t efficient.

1 hour ago, we_gotta_believe said:

I think it's just really hard to make deep playoff runs in back to back years in a league with so much parity. What the Bills did in the 90's was remarkable and overshadowed by the 4 losses in the big game, but they still were a damn good team.

Yea, I agree with this but it just seems like it affects the losers more than the winners. It very well could be just by chance but the Patriots and Chiefs seem to not have that problem.