Just now, Iggles_Phan said:

I like the thought, but I think we'd need a bruiser to complement Barkley.   Give me Blount for the Tush Push!   

Take Westbrook instsead of Shipley then.  He can return kicks/punts and be the 3rd guy with a burst.

4 minutes ago, TEW said:

I’ll tell you what, possibly the best part of Barkley’s incredible season is just how great of a guy he seems to be.

How on earth did the Giants let this man hit free agency?

Penny wise, pound foolish.  

They thought he'd be too expensive... but thought Daniel Jones was a good investment at 4x the cost!!!  And now they don't have either one.

 

Frankly though, the Giants did the best thing they could have for FOOTBALL fans.  Wasting a talent like Barkley on that team for his entire career would have been an all-time crime against the sport.

2 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

TO is the other guy.  You could have him instead of Dotson.

Is that legal?

1 minute ago, DrPhilly said:

TO is the other guy.  You could have him instead of Dotson.

I honestly wouldn’t want TO on this team. To much diva, even though he was a stud WR. I think a guy like him could be bad for the chemistry. Plus there is only one ball to go around.

2 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

Take Westbrook instsead of Shipley then.  He can return kicks/punts and be the 3rd guy with a burst.

OOOOOhhh... and PR!!!   Yes please!

 

Give me them ALL!!!

https://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/video/westbrook-s-punt-return-vs-nyg-9215382

(And, of course, it has to be the return against the Giants!)

9 minutes ago, BigEFly said:

Ejection for unsportsmanlike conduct.  

Its there,and the NFL are reticent to take that step.  If they officiated QBs the same way, it wouldn't be an issue for anyone - I don't want anyone headhunting a QB; but if a light touch is a flag because the player cynically baited it, then the balance will switch at some point to making a Mahomes QB feel the hit. And what happens after that is up to the gods

This shouldn't even be a conversation in a professional sport with video replay. But somehow it is

Just now, Frankfurteagle89 said:

I honestly wouldn’t want TO on this team. To much diva, even though he was a stud WR. I think a guy like him could be bad for the chemistry. Plus there is only one ball to go around.

Perhaps not worth the risk though 2004 went well enough

1 minute ago, DrPhilly said:

Perhaps not worth the risk though 2004 went well enough

Agreed that it wouldn’t be worth the risk. Imagine the drama if god forgive more throws go to Brown or Smith…

31 minutes ago, Frankfurteagle89 said:

If you could exchange one player from a former Eagles SB team with one player from this team, who would you switch?!

I’ll assume it has to be starter for starter…

TO for Dotson.

Say what you will about TO, but he was an absolute warrior for what he did in that Super Bowl. And if we are down late, adding that kind of firepower could win us the game.

Trotter for Burks is tempting, but I think he’d get cooked in the passing game.

And obviously Dawkins for either of the safeties would be a huge upgrade.

 

@Iggles_Phan Take over my friend.  Get what you can and/or pass the baton.  If we miss one so be it.  Both #23 and #22 will be interesting.

Just now, DrPhilly said:

 

@Iggles_Phan Take over my friend.  Get what you can and/or pass the baton.  If we miss one so be it.  Both #23 and #22 will be interesting.

I have 23 down to 20 figured out...  19 seems obvious given the New Orleans connection... 18 is where it gets more difficult, imo.

Part of me is tempted to say Reid for Sirianni, BUT, that would have to bend the rule slightly since I would only do the Reid of today, and not the Reid of 2004, (and of course, he's not a player). The Reid of 2004 can be partly blamed for the piss poor clock management at the end of Super Bowl 39.

1 minute ago, Iggles_Phan said:

I have 23 down to 20 figured out...  19 seems obvious given the New Orleans connection... 18 is where it gets more difficult, imo.

Got studs at 18 with reagor and dorial green-becham

3 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

I have 23 down to 20 figured out...  19 seems obvious given the New Orleans connection... 18 is where it gets more difficult, imo.

Maclin.

Alright sickos, who knows who this stud is.

3 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Got studs at 18 with reagor and dorial green-becham

I think you need to work on your spelling.   "Duds" is the correct way.  

2 minutes ago, EagleJoe8 said:

Part of me is tempted to say Reid for Sirianni, BUT, that would have to bend the rule slightly since I would only do the Reid of today, and not the Reid of 2004, (and of course, he's not a player). The Reid of 2004 can be partly blamed for the piss poor clock management at the end of Super Bowl 39.

Andy Reid is definitely a Hall of Fame coach, but he also needed a superstar QB like Maholmes just like Belichick needed Brady to reach those heights. IMO

Just now, Frankfurteagle89 said:

Andy Reid is definitely a Hall of Fame coach, but he also needed a superstar QB like Maholmes just like Belichick needed Brady to reach those heights. IMO

Extremely rare is the HC that doesn't. 

2 minutes ago, Frankfurteagle89 said:

Andy Reid is definitely a Hall of Fame coach, but he also needed a superstar QB like Maholmes just like Belichick needed Brady to reach those heights. IMO

Hurts isn't Mahomes for sure, but he's obviously a QB you can win with, and I think Reid of today could be very successful with this overall offense and roster in general.

A very nice breakdown.  

5 minutes ago, bpac55 said:

Alright sickos, who knows who this stud is.

Who could forget the great Darnell Aurty?

Just now, Know Life said:

Who could forget the great Darnell Aurty?

He's almost as good as my soon to be announced 22.

Possible tsunami headed towards New Orleans?

 

 

 

3 minutes ago, Know Life said:

Who could forget the great Darnell Aurty?

Wow

1 hour ago, ToastJenkins said:

Theres a shop out here with an italian dude by way of nyc. Treats the water and imported a wood fired oven from italy

That is awesome. It's all about the water.