5 hours ago, Freshmilk said:

True.  But I see them taking an interior lineman in the first 3 rounds.  Our depth is thin. Dickerson and Jurgens recovering, Steen got hurt last TC, and Green is a project.  As the roster currently stands an injury to any of Dickerson,  Jurgens, or Steen and it is problematic.  Or if Jurgens and/or Dickerson aren't ready to start the season.  Interior OL is a need.

Is Trevor Keegan invisible to you?  Or is he simply spoiled milk?

5 hours ago, Sack that QB said:

I like Jimmy's mock except for the first rounder. Would be a little underwhelmed.

That was my feeling too, but his capsule description did a good job of explaining his logic.  I wasn’t thrilled about the WR, but in Round 5 it was an acceptable pick.

32 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

Lol I just read that's what he ran.  I don't think there was any stumble or anything. 

On the other hand,  there's a WR from Arkansas. 6'7" 200lb who ran a 4.22 unofficial and 4.37 official which is crazy at 6'7". But that's awfully slim, and apparently he can't catch. 

Get him some stickem call him tall pinkston💪

4 hours ago, garingovt2000 said:

And boom goes the dynamite

I’ll see your Boom and raise you one

2 hours ago, Sack that QB said:

The Eagles aren't taking a CB in round 1. I'd bet anything on that.

If Revel were the BPA at 32 I can see Howie taking him.

23 minutes ago, Alphagrand said:

I have the same sources that guy does .... they get really loud when I'm eating too much chili.

Eh, it's totally a Browns move, though. Dude will be 32 in July making a ton of money, so why not?

2 hours ago, Alphagrand said:

I fast-forwarded to the 2-hour mark where they were discussing the Lions pick and they were trying to break down schematically how the Lions have been/would be using their DL.  Aaron Glenn isn't there anymore, so it's pretty presumptuous to think Kelvin Sheppard will run the same defensive scheme.  

As to the Eagles pick, their reasoning didn't make much sense to me in how they settled on Burden.  AJ Brown isn't going anywhere for a couple of years; even if he did, there really isn't any succession plan necessary for WRs.  There are 3-4 in almost every draft who are plug-and-play guys in Year 1.  The Eagles aren't going to spend the #32 draft pick on a WR3 in this offense.

As soon as they said Eagles, one of the panelists immediately said "James Pearce Jr."  That was the correct answer; if the board looked like that at #32 Howie would be on the phone with Pearce before the Chiefs pick has even reached the stage to hug Goodell.  Sikkema ended up overthinking it and got cute with a WR pick.

I like Sikkema a lot for his knowledge but he gets too cute regularly, as well as overly verbose.  How Connor puts up with him at times is a mystery.

13 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Is Trevor Keegan invisible to you?  Or is he simply spoiled milk?

Well... he didn't get a lot of field time this past year.  So, maybe he was invisible.

1 minute ago, Iggles_Phan said:

Well... he didn't get a lot of field time this past year.  So, maybe he was invisible.

It was pretty telling Stoutland didn't even let him start in the meaningless Week 18 game no starters played.

47 minutes ago, beto_eagles said:

I don't buy it. He'd leave like 90 million of dead cap. 

Never underestimate Jerry’s stupidity and hubris. 

Just now, LeanMeanGM said:

It was pretty telling Stoutland didn't even let him start in the meaningless Week 18 game no starters played.

Yeah... not a great look for him.

Only 35 snaps that game... out of 68.

BPA at 32, even if it's a CB. No guarantee Ringo is good. 

Just now, RLC said:

BPA at 32, even if it's a CB. No guarantee Ringo is good. 

Some say he was the worst Beatle.

47 minutes ago, EaglePhan1986 said:

Can you include cap space in a trade? It’s odd to me that you can trade a player but still have to pay his salary 

I would imagine that part of a trade could be a cash payment of part of the original Signing Bonus, which would transfer an equal amount of cap space to the paying team.

Note: I sent Jason at OTC that question. 

18 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

It was pretty telling Stoutland didn't even let him start in the meaningless Week 18 game no starters played.

I understand that conclusion.  Only time will tell whether it is correct or not. I personally am in wait and see mode.

15 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

Some say he was the worst Beatle.

Pete was best.

Hypothetical sort of question...

Suppose you were to donate money to a website and your donation qualified you for a 'gift'. Which 'gift' would be better for you to receive. A series of Blu-Ray discs contained in disc cases,  or a large capacity thumb drive that contained all of the contents of the Blu Ray discs?

 

51 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Is Trevor Keegan invisible to you?  Or is he simply spoiled milk?

Not invisible,  but not sold.

59 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Is Trevor Keegan invisible to you?  Or is he simply spoiled milk?

It’s worth noting that Keegan didn’t even start week 18.

Not saying he won’t be a good player, but I do think it points to the rate of his development.

12 minutes ago, VaBeach_Eagle said:

Hypothetical sort of question...

Suppose you were to donate money to a website and your donation qualified you for a 'gift'. Which 'gift' would be better for you to receive. A series of Blu-Ray discs contained in disc cases,  or a large capacity thumb drive that contained all of the contents of the Blu Ray discs?

 

I like physical copies, personally. That way you can rip them to a plex server for cloud use but can still use them with a disk player if your internet goes out.

21 minutes ago, VaBeach_Eagle said:

Hypothetical sort of question...

Suppose you were to donate money to a website and your donation qualified you for a 'gift'. Which 'gift' would be better for you to receive. A series of Blu-Ray discs contained in disc cases,  or a large capacity thumb drive that contained all of the contents of the Blu Ray discs?

 

blue-ray discs no question.

5 minutes ago, bpac55 said:

blue-ray discs no question.

Especially discs which could be used for copies of the Super Bowl.

23 minutes ago, VaBeach_Eagle said:

Hypothetical sort of question...

Suppose you were to donate money to a website and your donation qualified you for a 'gift'. Which 'gift' would be better for you to receive. A series of Blu-Ray discs contained in disc cases,  or a large capacity thumb drive that contained all of the contents of the Blu Ray discs?

 

 

Seriously though... go with the discs.

47 minutes ago, VaBeach_Eagle said:

Hypothetical sort of question...

Suppose you were to donate money to a website and your donation qualified you for a 'gift'. Which 'gift' would be better for you to receive. A series of Blu-Ray discs contained in disc cases,  or a large capacity thumb drive that contained all of the contents of the Blu Ray discs?

 

An upload to a cloud drive of the files.  Eliminates the need to handle media.  My ability to do so evaporated about five years ago.

45 minutes ago, Freshmilk said:

Not invisible,  but not sold.

Fair enough.  Even though unsold, still in inventory.