1 minute ago, ToastJenkins said:

If you were an udfa why on earth would

You sign with us?

depends on the position. there are some opportunities for a spot,

1 minute ago, HazletonEagle said:

yeah. a CB from the school of wasting talent. yipee!!!

Looks like a slot guy

https://aggieswire.usatoday.com/story/sports/college/aggies/football/2025/04/26/bj-mayes-texas-aggies-football-2025-nfl-draft-udfa/83290124007/

Zy Alexander to the seahwaks.

17 minutes ago, Eagles1960 said:

Makes sense. Ideally they keep all three but Toth and at least two others have to go. Max number of OLs is eleven.

Probably, but some of these guys can sit on the PS pretty easily and wait there until needed.

Toth and Pryor sit at the top of that list. But, like I said, its easier now to do it than it used to be given the new PS rules.

Starting 5 & 3 backups dress: Kinnard (swing OT), Green/Keegan (Swing OG), Kendall (C)... Green/Keegan and the two tackles are deactivated but on the roster, with Pryor and maybe Toth on the PS waiting for the call up if needed for a week or two. And that's 11 rostered with extra depth stashed.

Now... all that said, we need to see if they are worth keeping around, OR if one of them could actually be ready to step up sooner rather than later. Ultimately, its a great problem to have. And we have the OL coach that I trust to figure it all out.

1 minute ago, HazletonEagle said:

depends on the position. there are some opportunities for a spot,

We are wide open at outside CB for a UDFA

4 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

LOL @ Schefter for being such a liar.

Hope they set up near the rivers. GB was too polite. Looking forward to a crowd with attitude.

2 minutes ago, pgcd3 said:

We are wide open at outside CB for a UDFA

And a nose tackle would have a good shot as well

23 minutes ago, bpac55 said:

They've wasted spots on guys with no future here and gone in to games with just 52 on the roster. They can make it work.

Only having 52 on the roster for a game isn't that big of a deal. Only 46 dress, including any PS callups for that week, and you are limited in how many times a player can be called up. And each time you bring a player up to the roster, then cut him to put him back on the PS (Rather than a callup) he goes through waivers. So, if you aren't going to dress a guy from the PS that week, why add him to the roster? OR, if you are already calling a guy up but aren't planning to need him the following week anyway, why put him on the roster, rather than just using a PS callup for him?

Bucs signed the huge guy

17 minutes ago, pgcd3 said:

Give me Stackhouse & Hill or Bryant

Weird basketball names.

Fat guy from FL signed with Bucs

I don’t expect much in UDFA to continue with the looking under the couch cushions for change theme of the offseason.

maybe just 1 UDFA for us his year.

What a friggin tool.

1 minute ago, HazletonEagle said:

Bucs signed the huge guy

That's not that much. He spends that much in groceries every month!

got one!

26 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Just as long as he's not interested in becoming a fireman.

1 minute ago, NOTW said:

What a friggin tool.

Honestly surprised he’s still around. I think he’s running on nostalgia at this point.

ITS A FLOOD!!!

Looks like they were comfortable with Ringo and Jackson at CB.

Just now, Connecticut Eagle said:

Looks like they were comfortable with Ringo and Jackson at CB.

The season hasn't started yet

1 minute ago, NOTW said:

What a friggin tool.

Why is he still employed?

He was supposed to quit. Clausen sucked!

4 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

Bucs signed the huge guy

He would probably have pay a large fee to be shipped out of state.