3 hours ago, mayanh8 said:

I don't think Trump has any other option. It has to play out this way otherwise he's potentially in harm's way if Democrats win back the House.

It'll probably be the darkest moment this country has ever seen and we'll have deserved every bit we have coming to us.

We had a civil war dude…jfc grow up. We will get past all this

49 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:

KZ for posting supportive tweets

My money is on Diehard

1 minute ago, DEagle7 said:

My money is on Diehard

KZ will troll with it

11 minutes ago, ToastJenkins said:

We had a civil war dude…jfc grow up. We will get past all this

and the WOKE North Blue States still trying to tell us how to live!

5 hours ago, Bear Grylls said:

and the WOKE North Blue States still trying to tell us how to live!

9 hours ago, DEagle7 said:

My money is on Diehard

Grok thumbs up

Well it's a good thing the rapes only took place on the island and never in his homes in Florida and New York, oh wait.

Funny how quickly we have gone from "I disagree with how he's handling this" to outright defending him. Fact is, Trump is acting guilty as hell.

4 minutes ago, Paul852 said:

Funny how quickly we have gone from "I disagree with how he's handling this" to outright defending him. Fact is, Trump is acting guilty as hell.

Even AI os like nothing there yet. But I don't like how he handled it.

45 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Well it's a good thing the rapes only took place on the island and never in his homes in Florida and New York, oh wait.

2 minutes ago, Paul852 said:

Funny how quickly we have gone from "I disagree with how he's handling this" to outright defending him. Fact is, Trump is acting guilty as hell.

Your TDS is showing, Paul. It's very common for innocent people to engage in nakedly corrupt negotiations with convicted traffickers out of the blue after 4 years of them being in prison to offer them partial immunity to "find out what she knows" when her partner in the trafficking operation had been dead for 6 years. All very normal stuff and totally above board!

22 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Your TDS is showing, Paul. It's very common for innocent people to engage in nakedly corrupt negotiations with convicted traffickers out of the blue after 4 years of them being in prison to offer them partial immunity to "find out what she knows" when her partner in the trafficking operation had been dead for 6 years. All very normal stuff and totally above board!

Very common to ban them from your properties for hitting on a kid when you are into that yourself. Very common to dime a guy out who has dirt on you from his honeypot and then for him not to leak or use any of it against you.

31 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

Even AI os like nothing there yet. But I don't like how he handled it.

The same AI that was going full blown r acist a couple weeks ago? Yeah, I'll depend on my own two eyes. Thanks.

8 minutes ago, Paul852 said:

The same AI that was going full blown r acist a couple weeks ago? Yeah, I'll depend on my own two eyes. Thanks.

Yep. Ask ChatGPT the same question. Can there be some hidden evidence that comes out? Yeah. Until then he misled during the campaign and handled this horribly.

21 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

Very common to ban them from your properties for hitting on a kid when you are into that yourself. Very common to dime a guy out who has dirt on you from his honeypot and then for him not to leak or use any of it against you.

Yeah man, the timing of this Maxwell interview with the DOJ is just a coincidence I'm sure. Totally unrelated to the ever increasing evidence coming to light that he was best buds with Epstein for over a decade.

12 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

Yep. Ask ChatGPT the same question. Can there be some hidden evidence that comes out? Yeah. Until then he misled during the campaign and handled this horribly.

Oh ok. What's the motivation behind suddenly negotiating with Maxwell?

8 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Yeah man, the timing of this Maxwell interview with the DOJ is just a coincidence I'm sure. Totally unrelated to the ever increasing evidence coming to light that he was best buds with Epstein for over a decade.

Called making a spectacle after making false promises

Just now, Paul852 said:

Oh ok. What's the motivation behind suddenly negotiating with Maxwell?

Base is pissed off he misled them and posted raving at them about it and it's a PR move

This rube will believe anything to avoid facing the reality that he voted for a pedophile that raped kids with Jeffrey Epstein.

Just now, we_gotta_believe said:

This rube will believe anything to avoid facing the reality that he voted for a pedophile that raped kids with Jeffrey Epstein.

This guy will do anything to keep the coping going

2 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

This guy will do anything to keep the coping going

Yeah man. Totally. You're clearly on the right side of this one.

32 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

Yep. Ask ChatGPT the same question. Can there be some hidden evidence that comes out? Yeah. Until then he misled during the campaign and handled this horribly.

Neither of those AI engines have access to all the confidential/sealed info.

7 hours ago, Diehardfan said:

Grok thumbs up

And wouldnt you say that Maxwell is possible the missing link in this case? And that only she can tell us who really there and who wasnt? Wouldnt you? And if she says Trump wasnt there or that Trump was only there to keep eye on Epstein then we gotta take her at your word? And possibly she an innocent victim in all this too and we gotta consider that the justice system wrongful incarcerate her? And if its bad incarceration only a president pardon can correct the mistake. Wouldnt u say this could be true? Woudnt you?

7 minutes ago, Bear Grylls said:

And wouldnt you say that Maxwell is possible the missing link in this case? And that only she can tell us who really there and who wasnt? Wouldnt you? And if she says Trump wasnt there or that Trump was only there to keep eye on Epstein then we gotta take her at your word? And possibly she an innocent victim in all this too and we gotta consider that the justice system wrongful incarcerate her? And if its bad incarceration only a president pardon can correct the mistake. Wouldnt u say this could be true? Woudnt you?

1 hour ago, Diehardfan said:

Very common to ban them from your properties for hitting on a kid when you are into that yourself. Very common to dime a guy out who has dirt on you from his honeypot and then for him not to leak or use any of it against you.

Trump didn’t ban Epstein from his property for hitting on kids it was over a real estate dispute over a mansion. You know how he could clear this all up? Releasing the list. Wouldn’t that be simple? Since you like chat so much here you go:

Yes, Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein reportedly had a falling out in the early 2000s over a real estate dispute involving a mansion in Palm Beach, Florida.

In 2004, Trump and Epstein were both interested in purchasing the property known as Maison de L’Amitié. Trump ended up outbidding Epstein and bought the property for around $41 million. According to various reports, including those cited in biographies and investigative articles, this real estate competition may have contributed to the end of their social relationship.

While there’s no public record of a direct argument, this incident is widely believed to be a key factor in their falling out.

From Epsteins own brother:

What Mark Epstein Has Stated

1. Epstein Distanced Himself Because He Thought Trump Was a "Crook”

• Mark Epstein said Jeffrey "stopped hanging out with Donald Trump when he realized Trump was a crook,” according to a tape he viewed of his brother—part of unaired interviews Steve Bannon filmed in 2019  .

• This claim was reported by Business Insider and others based on Mark’s recounting  .

2. Their Friendship Was Close—Far From Casual Acquaintance

• In a July 2025 CNN interview, Mark Epstein described them as "very close” friends. He noted Trump visited Jeffrey’s office often in the 1990s and flew on Epstein’s private plane multiple times—relationships he observed firsthand  .

• He also pushed back against White House claims that Trump was never in Epstein’s office: "That’s just another blatant lie because he was there,” citing staff who saw him  .

3. The Infamous Married‑Women Joke

• During a 1999 flight with both brothers aboard Epstein’s jet, Jeffrey asked Trump: "How come you sleep with so many married women?” and Trump replied, "because it’s so wrong.” Mark said Epstein posed the question that way to hear Trump say it directly, highlighting the level of familiarity and trust between them  .

4. Trump Attempting to "Cover His Butt”

• Mark also criticized Trump’s post‑Epstein statements, calling them efforts "to cover his butt.” Trump had claimed he was not a fan and hadn’t spoken to Epstein for 15 years, but Mark insists their friendship only ended when Jeffrey decided Trump was untrustworthy  .