August 1Aug 1 4 hours ago, mr_hunt said:NewsweekDonald Trump's name in Jeffrey Epstein files redacted by...The Justice Department says the review turned up no "client list" or evidence linking President Trump to criminal activity,
August 6Aug 6 disgusting. They’re already trying to paint Maxwell as a victim/scapegoat to justify moving her to a country club prison & eventually pardoning her in exchange for lying to exonerate trump.
August 6Aug 6 1 minute ago, JohnSnowsHair said:this country is Fkked.yeah, the DOJ acting as the president’s personal defense attorneys isn’t a great look.
August 7Aug 7 7 hours ago, mr_hunt said:yeah, the DOJ acting as the president’s personal defense attorneys isn’t a great look.
August 7Aug 7 Imagine being "Independent" and thinking a list of powerful people who banged kids shouldn't be released
August 7Aug 7 35 minutes ago, DEagle7 said:Imagine being "Independent" and thinking a list of powerful people who banged kids shouldn't be releasedI'm a registered Libertarian, and I firmly believe a list of names should not simply be released. If there is evidence sufficient to bring charges against people, then bring charges. But simply putting out a list compiled by a pedophile...that would be unfair to people who may be listed and did nothing wrong. We can't accept the word of Epstein and/or Maxwell. This is why the FBI shouldn't announce that they are simply investigating someone...they should only go public when they charge someone. We could end up besmirching the names of a lot of people based solely on "evidence" provided by a convicted pedophile. Charge people with crimes and give them a chance to defend themselves.
August 7Aug 7 1 hour ago, vikas83 said:I'm a registered Libertarian, and I firmly believe a list of names should not simply be released. If there is evidence sufficient to bring charges against people, then bring charges. But simply putting out a list compiled by a pedophile...that would be unfair to people who may be listed and did nothing wrong. We can't accept the word of Epstein and/or Maxwell. This is why the FBI shouldn't announce that they are simply investigating someone...they should only go public when they charge someone.We could end up besmirching the names of a lot of people based solely on "evidence" provided by a convicted pedophile. Charge people with crimes and give them a chance to defend themselves.Sounds way too democratic. MAGA hates your proposal.
August 7Aug 7 1 hour ago, vikas83 said:I'm a registered Libertarian, and I firmly believe a list of names should not simply be released. If there is evidence sufficient to bring charges against people, then bring charges. But simply putting out a list compiled by a pedophile...that would be unfair to people who may be listed and did nothing wrong. We can't accept the word of Epstein and/or Maxwell. This is why the FBI shouldn't announce that they are simply investigating someone...they should only go public when they charge someone.We could end up besmirching the names of a lot of people based solely on "evidence" provided by a convicted pedophile. Charge people with crimes and give them a chance to defend themselves.While that's fair, and in general I agree with you. But at this point the damage occurring from not releasing anything seems too steep. It's been weaponized by Trump and now he's Joseph Smithing-it. Reading the golden plates without any witnesses while his followers lap it up. I'm not saying you prosecute everyone on it, but after all this attention and politicals attacks based on it I think the public should at least know what it says
Create an account or sign in to comment