August 7, 2025Aug 7 1 hour ago, vikas83 said:I'm a registered Libertarian, and I firmly believe a list of names should not simply be released. If there is evidence sufficient to bring charges against people, then bring charges. But simply putting out a list compiled by a pedophile...that would be unfair to people who may be listed and did nothing wrong. We can't accept the word of Epstein and/or Maxwell. This is why the FBI shouldn't announce that they are simply investigating someone...they should only go public when they charge someone.We could end up besmirching the names of a lot of people based solely on "evidence" provided by a convicted pedophile. Charge people with crimes and give them a chance to defend themselves.I think it should be released. The only exceptions being the victims and underage which should obviously be redactedMaxwell was convicted on trafficking kids to someone. Out them and charge them too. Though to be honest I'm amazed they weren't charged after whatever evidence they had to convict Maxwell was given in courtI understand the side of not wanting to out people who didn't do anything illegal with them because their public image would be tainted. I guess the counter to that would be should the public be able to make their own decision on if they want to continue to support that business with new information
August 7, 2025Aug 7 23 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:I think it should be released. The only exceptions being the victims and underage which should obviously be redactedMaxwell was convicted on trafficking kids to someone. Out them and charge them too. Though to be honest I'm amazed they weren't charged after whatever evidence they had to convict Maxwell was given in courtI understand the side of not wanting to out people who didn't do anything illegal with them because their public image would be tainted. I guess the counter to that would be should the public be able to make their own decision on if they want to continue to support that business with new informationI mean, in theory you and I could be on some "list" Epstein wrote and never know about it until it became public (obviously going to the extreme). I'm sure there are names he has that did nothing wrong, but are just famous people. You can't just widely release that. It's insane.
August 7, 2025Aug 7 43 minutes ago, DEagle7 said:While that's fair, and in general I agree with you. But at this point the damage occurring from not releasing anything seems too steep. It's been weaponized by Trump and now he's Joseph Smithing-it. Reading the golden plates without any witnesses while his followers lap it up. I'm not saying you prosecute everyone on it, but after all this attention and politicals attacks based on it I think the public should at least know what it saysLook, running for office on the promise to release the "Epstein list" was stupid, irresponsible and dangerous -- no decent person would do it, but this is Trump we are talking about. And now he should suffer all the consequences for breaking his promise.But I'm not OK with potentially ruining the lives of innocent people. No one should be.
August 7, 2025Aug 7 there isn’t an actual client list. I can’t speak for others but when I say release the epstein files/list, I mean go after those who were involved & the people epstein & maxwell trafficked children to. maxwell was found guilty of trafficking children to somebody. F’n who???
August 7, 2025Aug 7 1 minute ago, mr_hunt said:epstein only?The million dollar question. I would think that would be in her court records ? Which her lawyers say shouldn’t be released pending an appeal.
August 7, 2025Aug 7 16 minutes ago, vikas83 said:I mean, in theory you and I could be on some "list" Epstein wrote and never know about it until it became public (obviously going to the extreme). I'm sure there are names he has that did nothing wrong, but are just famous people. You can't just widely release that. It's insane.In theory he could have made up some names sure but logically it'd be people he's come across doing legitimate or illegitimate business withThe public stops using a certain business because of numerous reasons. Just being associated with Epstein would be the reasonI definitely get your point though. I just also see the other "side" as just letting the public decideDefinitely agree that all of the people that were doing something illegal should be investigated and charges brought on. They must have names otherwise what were both of them convicted for
August 8, 2025Aug 8 On 8/7/2025 at 2:03 PM, vikas83 said:I mean, in theory you and I could be on some "list" Epstein wrote and never know about it until it became public (obviously going to the extreme). I'm sure there are names he has that did nothing wrong, but are just famous people. You can't just widely release that. It's insane.That’s exactly what someone on the list would say
August 8, 2025Aug 8 Even though the girl telling the joke is Asian-American, there’s just no place for this in today’s society,
August 8, 2025Aug 8 Zuker's a "Christian" who pretends to care about kids getting raped only when it's politically convenient for him. Just like Jesus wanted.
August 11, 2025Aug 11 On 8/8/2025 at 3:14 PM, mr_hunt said:Nothing can end Trump's political life except for his death. I hope that happens right away.
Create an account or sign in to comment