1 hour ago, Fhalbig22 said:

Yea the lighting the artist used didn’t do me any favors…I am actually a lot tanner than that haha

Whatever you say, Firkle Smith

49 minutes ago, pallidrone said:

Or maybe I just don't like someone pushing their agenda about something that they probably never even cared about before.

Funny how you say ignore it if you don’t like it but can't do the same with someone saying no slongs in the cheerleaders.

2 hours ago, Alphagrand said:

Even though he's a cheerleader, it's fair to say seeing that didn't make me feel all that cheerful.

Try being gayer about things.

32 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Weren't Reagan and Ike both cheerleaders in college?

College and pros are different dude. Tossing women vs shaking ass

Are any starters playing tomorrow?

29 minutes ago, Sack that QB said:

I'm starting to become pro ESP now given how strongly everyone reacts to harmless stuff. Look at the replies to that, holy crap. Twitter is such a toxic place full of really mean and nasty people. If anyone is triggered by such a dumb thing, then they deserve it. I say keep on triggering.

Someone likes it and the people that don't like it feel they need to make their opinion heard instead of just ignoring it 🤷‍♂️

27 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

Funny how you say ignore it if you don’t like it but can't do the same with someone saying no slongs in the cheerleaders.

Try and be more precise with your language. I definitely like to fantasize about one shlong in the cheerleaders.

36 minutes ago, Sack that QB said:

I'm starting to become pro ESP now given how strongly everyone reacts to harmless stuff. Look at the replies to that, holy crap. Twitter is such a toxic place full of really mean and nasty people. If anyone is triggered by such a dumb thing, then they deserve it. I say keep on triggering.

This is a stupid take and you should never post again. Oh, and delete your account. And I am going to post your SSN on here too.

1 hour ago, Iggles25 said:

If ifs and buts where candy and nuts, they would be NFL cheerleaders

Excellent

27 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Are any starters playing tomorrow?

Maybe some Dotson - letting him run the WR1/WR2 routes.

Look for all LBs other than Baun and all the outside CBs other than Q - two of them will start week 1.

Finally Brown/Makuba.

41 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Are any starters playing tomorrow?

Just McKee.

1 hour ago, Diehardfan said:

College and pros are different dude. Tossing women vs shaking ass

Eisenhower graduated from West Point which was all men at the time. He also played football until he got injured trying to tackle Jim Thorpe.

43 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

Just McKee.

Hate to say it but Hurts got paid...

2 or 3 years ago Hurts went through camp with hardly an incompletion. Then he entered the season a turnover machine.

This camp, even ESP is giving him a bunch of Cs and B-s so hopefully the opposite will happen, and he will go in to the season playing really well.

3 hours ago, LeanMeanGM said:

need that joint practice champions banner to be hanging by week 1

2 hours ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Are any starters playing tomorrow?

3 hours ago, LeanMeanGM said:

They are true practice performers!

3 hours ago, LeanMeanGM said:

I thought I heard the Eagles lost both joint practices ....

Now the Browns are going to file an official protest with the NFL and the Competition Committee on the practice standings.

Eagles will probably play the starters for a Q, only 3 games so this is the pre-season warm up.

Next week it's about cutdown day.

Hopefully they bring back Shane Steichen when he is fired from the Colts this year

3 hours ago, jamiller said:

Try and be more precise with your language. I definitely like to fantasize about one shlong in the cheerleaders.

This is a stupid take and you should never post again. Oh, and delete your account. And I am going to post your SSN on here too.

Lol that's funny. On*

I don’t know how kelce and stroud made it inside the top 40 based off last year. Were much better options like from their 40-70 range I’d say Dion Dawkins, Carter, Mike Evans, William Anderson, Mitchell, baker, mclaurin, Hamilton, Trey McBride, Bijan, Brian Thomas and some others all had better years

Travis Kelce was not a top 300 NFL player in 2024.

Stroud was not a top 20 QB.

Someone explain Budda Baker to me?

Besides the no picks, no fumble recoveries, no forced fumbles, and a couple sacks...on a never top 10 D, what does he do on the field?

Is he the best at the 8 yards downfield tackle to set up 2nd and 2?

He has 7 career picks and 7 career pro bowls.

32 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

I don’t know how kelce and stroud made it inside the top 40 based off last year. Were much better options like from their 40-70 range I’d say Dion Dawkins, Carter, Mike Evans, William Anderson, Mitchell, baker, mclaurin, Hamilton, Trey McBride, Bijan, Brian Thomas and some others all had better years

Brown, Lane, Hurts, Baun and Barkley still not named heading into top 30. Either it will be the most loaded top 30 a team has had some at least two are being left off it.

2 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

Brown, Lane, Hurts, Baun and Barkley still not named heading into top 30. Either it will be the most loaded top 30 a team has had some at least two are being left off it.

Was the voting done before the playoffs? Cause otherwise (even still) it’d be hard to Imagine any of those guys missing