Well at least the Cowboys did their job and made us feel a little better about this week.👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

1 hour ago, greend said:

I'm hard pressed to find the Eagles above .500 now. Hope I'm wrong but......

They are 4-2. You are wrong. That is above. 500

15 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Up in the booth playing madden, writing down plays to use next time he gets a chance.

Madden is too advanced. He’ll start with something

more on his level

3 minutes ago, pisceschica said:

this makes me fee better...it would be great if their next game was a tie.. but if I have to choose btwn dall/was..go was

Honestly... it would be better if Washington took the "L".

idk why on their last OFF possession cowboys went away from what was working ..but glad they lost

4 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

They are 4-2. You are wrong. That is above. 500

Big if true.

i wish browns would save us from our misery..this game is over 9-23 with 1:55 left just take knews

Hurts will look great when his first read is there. They marched up the field when he was able to just get it to Brown as quick as possible. But you see him stare him down every time. This happened on their scoring drives Thursday. They both looked great. Brown is just a physical freak and will make the play. But if Hurts can't make that first read, you see his brain go haywire. He panics and you can see it in his movements. His initial reaction to scramble and just have no idea what to do. We watch these plays where he has all the time in the world to get rid of the ball but can't make a decision. So many times these end up in sacks or a catch behind the line of scrimmage. Last year we had to here about the offense wasn't scheming to get open and it was Moores fault. Now it's KP's fault. Now we're watching him sail throws. That throw to Smith was just awful. No reason to over throw him when he's out there on an island. If anything KP needs to scheme up more of these Goedert score yardage plays and more slants. But when you can't get the run game going, everything struggles. Everyone on this offense just isn't executing. Oline is rough and Barkley is really struggling.

3 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

Honestly... it would be better if Washington took the "L".

true but I don't see the eagles turning things around

9 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

The 5-1 Colts led be Daniel Jones. Didn't see that ish coming.

They’ve done an impressive job. Could’ve won the rams game if their wide receiver didn’t just fumble the ball into the end zone with no one touching him.

Curious to see how they look down the stretch of the season. They have a tougher schedule: at Chargers (4-2), vs titans (1-4), at Pittsburgh (5-1), vs. Atlanta (2-2), at KC (2-3) vs. Houston (2-3), at jags (4-2), at Seattle (4-2), vs. sf (4-1), vs jags (4-2) and at Houston (2-3).

3 minutes ago, pisceschica said:

lol Caleb Williams

17 minutes ago, D-Shiznit said:

I've been one of the most vocal of Hurts' supporters, but his lack of progress has gotten to me. He has shown no improvement as a passer.

Im still not sure it’s all on him but whatever it is needs to change fast.

i hate bucs and niners..

8 minutes ago, coalesce said:

Last year we had to hear about the offense wasn't scheming to get open and it was Moores fault.

I don’t remember this. I remember the opposite. Most were happy to have a real OC and not some weird combo of Sirianni and some JAG.

The skill position players were also objectively open a lot more last year than this yr for whatever reason.

That doesn’t completely absolve Hurts. He has bone headed plays. The best of them miss open receivers though.

Going into the season I thought this Eagles team could be all-time great.

I did not see Dickerson and Jurgens being an injury/recovery mess.

I was hoping Patullo/Siri could just be average at play calls / scheme

I was expecting Campbell to be good and CB 2 to be the worst thing about a very good defense.

I was expecting AJ to run out his routes.

I wasn't expecting Hurts having his worst career game vs the Giants.

They won't be all-time great or even clearly the most talented this year but there are no special teams this year.

Be one of the 6 to 8 best teams. Get some home games. Get down in the mud and clobber 3 or 4 teams in the playoffs and win ugly.

Win the next 4 and they pretty much control the NFC. I'm not saying it will be easy but they can beat 4 flawed teams.

IF SF gets the 1 seed through some lucky bounces then be the first team to win the NFCCG and SB in the same stadium.

43 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Because you don’t fire first time guys 6 weeks into the job. You don’t want to look impatient and reckless. They will have to hire someone else to replace him and if they see that’s the leash given to the last guy, it could make them second guess if that’s the job they want to take.

Demote him, replace him, whatever. What is the point of firing him? You push him to the side to make your team better and then dismiss him during the offseason.

I see zero difference in shoving a guy aside and removing his responsibilities, and firing him. How would a prospective coach see that and not also think they have a short leash? It's semantics, "Hey you're not calling plays, or doing the gameplanning, or making personnel decisions but we won't fire you so it doesn't look as bad".

Also, this isn't a case of a guy on a short leash. It's a clearly unqualified guy running a horrific offense for a team with SB aspirations over the first quarter of the season in a sport that doesn't give any time to recover from a tailspin if it gets to that point like in 2023. They're basically giving up on the season allowing him to continue to run this offense any further, and especially if they still have him doing it after the bye.

Tl;dr he should be fired. But if they want to just "quasi fire" him to somehow save face that needed to be done after Sunday and definitely needs to be done before the bye.

Jordan Love gonna Jordan Love

I'm not going to the best organization in football because they noticed their OC was grade Z incompetent and they demoted him before giving him 10 games to ruin their season!

-- Said no one ever.

The hell was Vildor doing. Dude intercepted it, fell down without being touched, then tried to get up and run like 3 times but just fell every time 9 yards away from the endzone

1st play of the Flacco Era

Lets see how many Packers can hit Chase if he takes a handoff and runs sideways the entire length of the field...

I think it was 3 Packers.

1 hour ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

What about the previous 3 weeks heading into the giants game. defense played 66, 68 and 70 snaps. So on average 68 snaps. Doesn’t include Tampa where the conditions were ridiculous. Went a looked eagles numbers are skewed cause they’ve played an extra game but going to their numbers prior to the week, eagles had 176 attempts against them league avg was 161. So 15 more than league avg. rushing attempts against league avg was 129. Eagles were at 134 so 5. So in general they were 20 plays over the average. If someone has a link besides or football reference which won’t let me do weeks 3-5 alone, but curious to see the 3 weeks leading up to the giants the snap count compared to rest of the league

I would have to look again, it was not a deep dive i basically just looked at players who played 100% defensive snaps for a given team and used those numbers against players on other teams playing 100% of their snaps. I don't have any fancy subscriptions so I just used what was on here

https://www.footballguys.com/stats/snap-counts/teams

I looked because I was of the same belief that they had played significantly more snaps than other teams. I do agree though the situation of the snaps probably has taken more of a toll than other teams with the constant 3 and outs

5 minutes ago, devpool said:

I see zero difference in shoving a guy aside and removing his responsibilities, and firing him. How would a prospective coach see that and not also think they have a short leash? It's semantics, "Hey you're not calling plays, or doing the gameplanning, or making personnel decisions but we won't fire you so it doesn't look as bad".

Also, this isn't a case of a guy on a short leash. It's a clearly unqualified guy running a horrific offense for a team with SB aspirations over the first quarter of the season in a sport that doesn't give any time to recover from a tailspin if it gets to that point like in 2023. They're basically giving up on the season allowing him to continue to run this offense any further, and especially if they still have him doing it after the bye.

Tl;dr he should be fired. But if they want to just "quasi fire" him to somehow save face that needed to be done after Sunday and definitely needs to be done before the bye.

I’m just saying what they would do. He’s not the first incompetent assistant coach. Castillo, Groh, Taylor, Scangarello, Desai, Patricia, Johnson etc all didn’t get fired mid season, let alone after 6 games. Howie and Lurie act in hypersensitive ways to be the "gold standard” or whatever they want to be. The only guy at all I can even remember fired early in the last 20 years was Chip Kelly who only got fired because he was a d-head.

damn he aint no rodgers