3 minutes ago, DaEagles4Life said:

**** and smoke grass, sounds like a plan. Se ya'll in a few days.

You know that signal chat was gold after they found out it was a white male republican

It was a whole bunch of

3 minutes ago, DaEagles4Life said:

That's leadership.

47 minutes ago, Gannan said:

If you're upset you can just delete the thread like you did the last one.

If I could, I would. You people are insane.

Just now, DrPhilly said:

In all seriousness it really isn't funny. I mean, one can laugh for a moment but in the end this sheet is really really bad for the country.

HE is right that these things can't consume us. Do I like what he says all the time? No. I don't like them hurting people who posted about Kirk either even if I think they are POS

To me the left who wants to destroy our culture is a bigger threat and I won't apologize for thinking that.

39 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

so, to be clear, the shooter wasn't a trans male like the bootlickers were running with, right?

No, he was a perfectly normal, sane individual - like you.

1 minute ago, dawkins4prez said:

**** and smoke grass, sounds like a plan. Se ya'll in a few days.

TGIF, except every day is the weekend for me. I’m retired and hoping Pennsylvania will join our surrounding states and make recreational use legal.

1 minute ago, Diehardfan said:

HE is right that these things can't consume us. Do I like what he says all the time? No. I don't like them hurting people who posted about Kirk either even if I think

To me the left who wants to destroy our culture is a bigger threat and I won't apologize for thinking that.

I think it is too late. It has already consumed us. You can hold out individually but society has already moved too far.

What Trump should do right now is walk back his own words over the last 24hrs and push back on all the others on the right for their inflaming words as they jumped the gun. No doubt he will double down instead. He does not care about the country. He only cares about himself and his own narcissism. Perhaps you will come to understand that at some point in the future.

8 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

To me the left who wants to destroy our culture is a bigger threat and I won't apologize for thinking that.

What does this even mean?

10 minutes ago, Procus said:

If I could, I would.

Oh we know you big baby.

18 minutes ago, Procus said:

If I could, I would. You people are insane.

Censorship and obstruction of free speech? Charlie Kirk would be so disappointed, procus.

18 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

HE is right that these things can't consume us. Do I like what he says all the time? No. I don't like them hurting people who posted about Kirk either even if I think they are POS

To me the left who wants to destroy our culture is a bigger threat and I won't apologize for thinking that.

You know what I like the most about you, velcro? The logical consistency.

For what it’s worth, most folks, media, etc always use the terms "right” or "left” when discussing politics and/or ideologies within the US.

This is primarily due to the use of the "two party” system over the course of hundreds of years. It has its pros and cons. The pros to using (or primarily voting for one of only two parties) is that it reduces and combines hundreds of ideologies into two groups - reducing the likelihood of a fringe ideology from taking office.

For example, in many countries, there could be a dozen or more political parties that run for office and gain enough support to split the vote - so that a party with as little as 20-30% of the vote could win. Meaning that 70-80% of the country did not vote for that party. This usually leads to very little support of the party and little to nothing getting done politically while that party is in office.

A con of the "2 party system” is that everyone is considered either "right” or "left” and that’s simply not true.

The political compass is a cross - not a straight line from left to right and/or vice versa.

Many were quick to judge the shooter as a radical leftist. Now the other side is saying he’s a radical rightist.

Neither is correct.

From initial reports, he could be conservative/moderate socially but politically libertarian/anarchist.

And anyone who takes to assassinating a person for political reasons (he wrote anti fascist messages on his bullets and casings) is by definition a radical.

He may not simply be radical left or radical right - he’s likely closer to a radical libertarian/anarchist - with both anti-fascist and some conservative values. A likely driving force behind his ideology likely comes from a confused and deranged state of mind - stemming from the fact that his ideology does not fit within most political circles.

My 2 cents.

1 minute ago, Ace Nova said:

For what it’s worth, most folks, media, etc always use the terms "right” or "left” when discussing politics and/or ideologies within the US.

I also dislike the labels "left" and "right" or "liberals" and "conservatives". I much prefer to use "intelligent humans" and "trump voters".

Charlie Kirk shot by a white, Mormon, raised by Republicans.

Evergreen High School shooter radicalized by white supremacists.

Rough couple of hours for the "liberals are bad" crowd

27 minutes ago, Procus said:

If I could, I would. You people are insane.

We're not the ones who jumped to conclusions and declared war on half the population of America over the assassination of a polarizing political figure.

To be sure Kirk did not deserve to be shot and killed, and I have great sympathy for his family and loved ones.

But the right wing of this country from the president down - not just random morons on social media but elected officials and high profile political commentators on major news networks - reacted to this by driving the wedge deeper and vilifying their neighbors and countrymen.

Go buy a mirror.

17 hours ago, The_Omega said:

but the guy in the picture screams ex-military, maybe ex-special forces to me, and his seemingly impeccable planning does too. The reported messages on the evidence left behind, just like in Minnesota, seems convenient as well. Now, they could announce in the next hour that they just arrested an intellectually challenged trans-activist for the shooting, proving this post as ridiculous as I think it might be, but it just seems like a professional job.

Just wanted to remind you that you're professionally retarded.

17 hours ago, The_Omega said:

Alright, tinfoil hat time. The guy in the picture, the ease of escape, leaving the evidence behind, maybe I’ve watched too many spy shows but this sure seems like it could have been an organized hit to try to stir up the anger and resentment that we’re seeing right now. Yeah, I was pissed off too (still am honestly) but the guy in the picture screams ex-military, maybe ex-special forces to me, and his seemingly impeccable planning does too. The reported messages on the evidence left behind, just like in Minnesota, seems convenient as well. Now, they could announce in the next hour that they just arrested an intellectually challenged trans-activist for the shooting, proving this post as ridiculous as I think it might be, but it just seems like a professional job.

Yup, this guy ^^^^ is a f'ing idiot. Should have been obvious all along

This was funny

@Procus we ride at dawn

@Arthur Jackson maybe you too

3 hours ago, Mike030270 said:

Mail Online

Charlie Kirk 'killer' identified as Tyler Robinson

The suspect in Charlie Kirk's assassination has been identified as Tyler Robinson, a 22-year-old Utah resident.

Definitely trans with anti-fascist ideology right?

Didn’t one of the bullet casings say "hey fascists, catch”?