Just now, NYEagle said:

And you are the type of person that got no attention from Mommy and Daddy, need to come on here, state 1,000's of non-factual statements......and then, on the off chance 1 of them turns out to be correct......you say "LOOK AT ME......I WAS RIGHT!!" forgetting to say I was only right 1 time out of 1,000's. You are like a broken clock on steroids.

And seeing as you want to be precise....provide evidence of the statements you made.

I already did cite specific examples of things from TO and Antonio Freeman choosing the eagles because of McNabb, and Torrey Smith and Mike Wallace saying Carson Wentz was "the majority" and "99%" of the reason they wanted to play here. Now you think its my responsibility to continue repeating myself for you because you cant pay attention?

So... not on ignore yet? Or.... you just plugging your ears and throwing tantrums now?

9 hours ago, LeanMeanGM said:

I’ll throw out something else to debate. Tomorrow we are playing against Jadeveon Clowney. He’s in his 12th year but never had a 10 sack season.

Factoring in where he was drafted, Is he a bust?

I believe he is going to be questionable to play today. I wouldn’t say a complete bust but yeh, more was expected , from me at least.

7 hours ago, devpool said:

Nah, he's played for 12 years. IMO a bust is someone who completely fails and never does a single thing. Why I don’t consider mamula a bust either. A bust isn’t simply just a disappointment, it's an absolute failure of a pick.

See DAL 1st rd picks from Michigan, that’s the definition of bust.

2 minutes ago, Joe Ball said:

I believe he is going to be questionable to play today. I wouldn’t say a complete bust but yeh, more was expected , from me at least.

Schefter said last night he’s expected to play

It depends on the blog definition of bust.

A long career may not be a bust. But not preforming up to draft position may be a bust. Gray area. Has the blog ever hashed this one out before?

Just now, LeanMeanGM said:

Schefter said last night he’s expected to play

He’s a decent depth and rotational piece, I don’t expect much from him honestly. I’m more curious to see how Perrion Winfrey looks in his first game.

31 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

You did not ask me to provide evidence of statements that I made. If you had, it would be different. I like how you guys have to really dumb yourselves down and try to believe the ridiculous stories you make up. The sooner all of you Hurts idiots have me on ignore, the better. Trust me, your impetulance has finally served me well.

Truly a gentleman and a scholar.

12 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Truly a gentleman and a scholar.

I’m fascinated by words like that. Words that don’t exist but people have been indoctrinated into believing it does. like Ruffiage; spent my whole life thinking that was a word

When you’re driving down the stream after a big storm, make sure to avoid all the ruffiage on the sides of the road

26 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

It depends on the blog definition of bust.

A long career may not be a bust. But not preforming up to draft position may be a bust. Gray area. Has the blog ever hashed this one out before?

I believe bust and not living up to draft status Are two different things. Bust goes beyond where you’re drafted

Nate Allen, the safety we took with the Dawkins pick, was not worth a 2nd round pick; but he had a decent career. He was not a bust

Time to make it 6-0. Let's Go.

41 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

I already did cite specific examples of things from TO and Antonio Freeman choosing the eagles because of McNabb, and Torrey Smith and Mike Wallace saying Carson Wentz was "the majority" and "99%" of the reason they wanted to play here. Now you think its my responsibility to continue repeating myself for you because you cant pay attention?

So... not on ignore yet? Or.... you just plugging your ears and throwing tantrums now?

And yet, you haven't provided ONE quote from ONE player saying they wouldn't play here because of Hurts? And again....Barkley came here, he had a choice, he knew who the QB was....all of our offensive players signed extensions knowing who the QB was. Yet you have all of these mythical NFL players staying away from this team, because of this QB? Did Hurts f your mom or something?

11 minutes ago, Aerolithe_Lion said:

I’m fascinated by words like that. Words that don’t exist but people have been indoctrinated into believing it does. like Ruffiage; spent my whole life thinking that was a word

When you’re driving down the stream after a big storm, make sure to avoid all the ruffiage on the sides of the road

It's ok, he makes up words like he makes up facts.....If it's Always Sunny in Philadelphia, It's Always Delusional In Hazelton.  

1 minute ago, NYEagle said:

And yet, you haven't provided ONE quote from ONE player saying they wouldn't play here because of Hurts? And again....Barkley came here, he had a choice, he knew who the QB was....all of our offensive players signed extensions knowing who the QB was. Yet you have all of these mythical NFL players staying away from this team, because of this QB? Did Hurts f your mom or something?

You think Hurts would look twice at whatever birthed HE?

1 minute ago, mikemack8 said:

You think Hurts would look twice at whatever birthed HE?

I mean Hurts is also probably a raging alcoholic and meth head according to HE....so I mean maybe it was on a bender?

I just can't help to think of this when it comes to HE......

For the conspiracy believers, look for the refs to put their thumb on the scale today. The Thursday game between the Chiefs and Cowboys will be more interesting if Dallas was still relevant.

3 minutes ago, Connecticut Eagle said:

For the conspiracy believers, look for the refs to put their thumb on the scale today. The Thursday game between the Chiefs and Cowboys will be more interesting if Dallas was still relevant.

Conspiracy theorists will have a reason for why it played out how it did regardless of the result

@mattwill

Tough not having Lane but Fred rises to the challenge.

Birds 41 Jerruh’s 28

Bonus: Carter with a revenge sack on Dak.

Bonus, Bonus: BigEFly laughs when the camera shows mad Jerruh in the fourth. Don’t let the cowpads score above mislead as it includes Dak garbage time score.

1 hour ago, NYEagle said:

You are a gossip monger whose estrogen might be spiking......you make statements, I asked you to provide facts to back up those statements and you say "I've had enough, I don't want to talk about it any more!" I've never used the "ignore" feature on here in over 20 years of posting on the MB....thanks for being my first.

Typical for HE. He does that all the time.

56 minutes ago, Joe Ball said:

See DAL 1st rd picks from Michigan, that’s the definition of bust.

You need to pick better Wolverines in the first round.

24 minutes ago, NYEagle said:

And yet, you haven't provided ONE quote from ONE player saying they wouldn't play here because of Hurts? And again....Barkley came here, he had a choice, he knew who the QB was....all of our offensive players signed extensions knowing who the QB was. Yet you have all of these mythical NFL players staying away from this team, because of this QB? Did Hurts f your mom or something?

That's silliness. Not an assertion I've ever made.

But maybe next year you can start your own list. AJ Brown may be your first name.

On the latest Philly Special episode Berman and Sheil had a little bit of a back and forth about why the offense is the way it is. Berman was pretty adamant that the offense is the way it is because that's the way Sirianni wants it. That he believes other teams find ways to lose and his philosophy is if the Eagles remove the aspect of losing themselves the games with turnovers then they're going to win most games in the long run. And Sheil countered with you can be risk averse without running all hitch routes on 3rd down and that doesn't mean you can't ever run a mesh play or some crossing routes. And Berman pushed back and said while that has some merit Sirianni has been with Hurts since he got here and he knows better than anyone what Jalen Hurts is comfortable with. And that Hurts is on board with it because SB57 changed his outlook and all he cares about is winning now, no matter how ugly.(He should have talked to me and he'd come to realize they actually did win the game). Seems Berman is of the belief that the offense the Eagles run is a Sirianni mandate to eliminate risk and he doesn't think it's going to change much. Though they can execute the things they are doing better.

26 minutes ago, NYEagle said:

It's ok, he makes up words like he makes up facts.....If it's Always Sunny in Philadelphia, It's Always Delusional In Hazelton.  

25 minutes ago, NYEagle said:

I mean Hurts is also probably a raging alcoholic and meth head according to HE....so I mean maybe it was on a bender?

Ironic...

10 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

Typical for HE. He does that all the time.

Actually has never happened...

2 hours ago, HazletonEagle said:

That's actually a strawman so you are incorrect. There is no burden of proof on me to prove something I never said happened. You guys are dumb and there's not anything I can do about it anyway.

Forgot to make a prediction last week.

@mattwill

Eagles- 38

Cowboys- 19

Jihaad Campbell- Pick 6

Jalen Hurts- 300 yards passing 1 rushing TD, 3 passing TD

Brandon Aubrey- 60+ yard FG