Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

The Eagles Message Board

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

2 hours ago, Gannan said:

Oh come on! Donald Trump could write an executive order stating that ICE can castrate any registered Democrat or independent. Until you have been castrated, you can't claim he broke the law. That's just common sense! Why can't you see that!

That’s not analogous at all to this situation. Nor did I ever say that states have to wait until the USPS starts ENFORCING new mail in ballot rules before states can sue. What I very clearly said is that there has to be a published provision for states to bring a suit against in order to claim harm. Otherwise the only evidence for their harm is what they THINK the final provision might say. You can’t say a regulation violates the constitution when there isn’t even the regulation hasn’t even been created yet.

My opinion is backed by plenty of precedence.

Can you provide an example of when a plaintiff successfully sued the government over the instruction to draft a proposed rule?

There is no law and only an EO. None the less SCITUS should have not expedited this first one. All of it is a red herring since the real case is coming shortly which will be on the merits.

1 hour ago, DrPhilly said:

There is no law and only an EO. None the less SCITUS should have not expedited this first one. All of it is a red herring since the real case is coming shortly which will be on the merits.

Correct the provision has been published and has been challenged. And additional challenges are coming as well. I expect an injunction will be issued the first or 2nd week of September. And I expect the government to then lose the case.

in honor of arthur.

Fart Wind GIF - Fart Wind Silencer - Discover & Share GIFs

  • Author

11 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:

@Procus Looks like ya'lls strong crop of '28 contenders just keeps getting stronger

  • Author
  • Author
4 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:

LOLOL. Yea, inflation is worse. GDP growth is worse. Job growth is SIGNIFICANTLY worse. The deficit is worse. Yes clearly what we need is more Trump bootlickers in congress. That will make things better.

6 hours ago, Phillyterp85 said:

LOLOL. Yea, inflation is worse. GDP growth is worse. Job growth is SIGNIFICANTLY worse. The deficit is worse. Yes clearly what we need is more Trump bootlickers in congress. That will make things better.

TDS

The upcoming SCOTUS ruling on the mail in ballot EO is the biggest test yet in terms of how far SCOTUS will allow Trump to go. Time for them to say "you’ve gone too far already” thus sending a message with regard to the other Trump election shenanigans that are sure to follow.

1 hour ago, DrPhilly said:

The upcoming SCOTUS ruling on the mail in ballot EO is the biggest test yet in terms of how far SCOTUS will allow Trump to go. Time for them to say "you’ve gone too far already” thus sending a message with regard to the other Trump election shenanigans that are sure to follow.

Yup. Should be DOA. Though wouldn't surprise me if 1 or even 2 of the justices voted in favor of the government's side. I thought the birthright citizenship case would be 8-1 at worst and that didn't happen.

24 minutes ago, Phillyterp85 said:

Yup. Should be DOA. Though wouldn't surprise me if 1 or even 2 of the justices voted in favor of the government's side. I thought the birthright citizenship case would be 8-1 at worst and that didn't happen.

Don’t think you can count on anything for sure at this point.

1 hour ago, Phillyterp85 said:

Yup. Should be DOA. Though wouldn't surprise me if 1 or even 2 of the justices voted in favor of the government's side. I thought the birthright citizenship case would be 8-1 at worst and that didn't happen.

Thomas and Alito basically never vote against Trump. So expect those 2 to uphold the law, while the 3 liberals vote against Trump.

Roberts, Comey Barrett, Kavanaugh and Gorsuch - those are the 4 conservatives that could reject Trump. The order listed is my guess on the likelihood they rule against the President.

I'll say 6-3, EO is defeated.

I've lost all faith in Gorsuch. We've also seen Kavanaugh make some questionable judgements too, so a 5-4 split would not shock me in the least.

  • Author
  • Author
  • Author
  • Author
  • Author

Cult

  • Author
7 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:

damn @Procus, your crush is really dropping some dimes here.

  • Author

  • Author

Create an account or sign in to comment

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.